SPIRITUS MUNDISupportESEN

WORK

Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival: The Man behind the Mystery of the Cathedrals

Fulcanelli dévoilé · Fulcanelli and the alchemical revival : the man behind the Mystery of the cathedrals · Fulcanelli y el renacimiento alquímico

francés; esta edición es la traducción inglesa de Jack Cain, con títulos, cartas, documentos de archivo y notas citados en francés sin traducir dentro del cuerpo, más latín en el epígrafe del prólogo y griego transliterado en los pasajes de cábala herméticala página de derechos imprime «Copyright © 1996 by Éditions Dervy» para el original francés y «Translation © 2006 by Inner Traditions International» para esta versión, con «First U.S. edition published in 2006 by Destiny Books» (p. 125); el índice del digest del EPUB rotula la casa como «Simon & Schuster, [N_p_], 2005», dato que no aparece en el troceo y que no se heredaAlquimiaHermetismo

Source entries are currently shown in Spanish; English-first entries arrive with the next cataloguing pass.

Una investigación sobre la identidad del alquimista que firmó *Le Mystère des Cathédrales*. La portada declara de una vez la obra, la autora y su traductor: «FULCANELLI AND THE ALCHEMICAL REVIVAL The Man behind the Mystery of the Cathedrals Geneviève Dubois Translated by Jack Cain» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 2». La página de derechos encadena las dos ediciones y da el título francés del que deriva: «Originally published in French under the title Fulcanelli dévoilé by Éditions» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 125», con «Copyright © 1996 by Éditions Dervy Translation © 2006 by Inner Traditions International» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 125».

El asunto lo enuncia el prólogo de Roger Gallois, que lo pone a la altura de Luis XVII y del Hombre de la Máscara de Hierro: «it is without a doubt the one occupying first place in the realm of hermetic science—that is, the haunting Fulcanelli affair.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6». Ese mismo prólogo presenta a la autora como la investigadora del caso: «Fascinated by this famous enigma, Geneviève Dubois, for it is indeed she we are speaking of, firmly rose to the challenge by adopting the unshakable resolution to try and tear away the veil.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7».

Lo que el libro se propone lo dice la apertura de su capítulo tercero, y el método se ve ahí entero: no discutir la doctrina de los dos libros firmados «Fulcanelli», sino reconstruir el medio de personas que los hizo posibles. «Let us now investigate in more detail this fascinating business and see how a few individuals, all connected by their membership in groups concerned with magic or spiritualism or in the Freemasonry movement, were able, owing to the publication of two books, to assist the resurgence of alchemy.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23». Los dos libros que investiga son los que fija esa misma plana: «Nevertheless, it was not until 1926 that there appeared, to general indifference, a book with the title Le Mystère des Cathédrales. Signed “Fulcanelli,” and with a press run of three hundred copies, it was published by Schémit at 45 rue Laffite in Paris. Le Mystère des Cathédrales was followed in 1930 by Les Demeures Philosophales, in one volume, similarly signed, and also published by Schémit.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23».

Las tres personas alrededor de las cuales gira la investigación son el librero y helenista Pierre Dujols, que firmaba Magophon —«Note that the pseudonym of Dujols is Magophon (Voice of the Mage) and that Georges Ranque does not include Fulcanelli as a possible adept.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»—, el dibujante Jean-Julien Champagne y el egiptólogo René Schwaller de Lubicz, cuyo manuscrito sobre las catedrales góticas pasó por manos de Champagne: «Schwaller, being trusting, willingly loaned his manuscript to Champagne, and Jean-Julien promised to return it quickly. He kept it, though, for several days, at the end of which time he returned it to Schwaller and advised him that the study revealed too many secrets and therefore could not be made available to just anyone.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51». La adjudicación que el volumen propone es su tesis y aquí se consigna como tal, con su locator y sin arbitrar.

El volumen cierra con una serie de apéndices que son documento transcrito —cronologías, cartas de Levet a Papus y de Canseliet a Schwaller, el obituario de Dujols, las cartas natales de Dujols y de Champagne, la bibliografía de Schwaller y una lista parcial de la literatura sobre Fulcanelli— y con una solapa que sitúa a la autora: «Geneviève Dubois, author of several books in French on alchemical and Hermetic studies, is a member of the ARK’ALL Foundation devoted to the study of operative alchemy. She lives in France.» «Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 122».

714 claims · 2 sources · 1 attribution

Attribution

recorded, never asserted
DECLARED
la portada imprime «FULCANELLI AND THE ALCHEMICAL REVIVAL The Man behind the Mystery of the Cathedrals Geneviève Dubois Translated by Jack Cain Destiny Books Rochester, Vermont» (p. 2); la ficha de la Library of Congress registra «Dubois, Geneviève. [Fulcanelli dévoilé. English]» (p. 125); el prólogo de Roger Gallois la nombra como la investigadora del caso (p. 7) y la nota final del volumen la presenta como miembro de la ARK’ALL Foundation (p. 122)
per Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)
«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 2»

The chain of the work

the processed witness, in emerald
EDITION
Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006), ed. francés 1996
francés · 1996 · París — la página de derechos declara «Originally published in French under the title Fulcanelli dévoilé by Éditions Dervy, 34, boulevard Edgar Quinet 75014, Paris» (p. 125)
TRANSLATION · PROCESSED
Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)
inglés · 2006 · Rochester, Vermont — Destiny Books, división de Inner Traditions International, One Park Street; la página de derechos imprime «print ISBN 978-1-59477-082-1 (pbk.)», «ebook ISBN 978-1-62055-335-0 (ebk.)» y el número de catalogación «QD24.A2D8313 2006» (p. 125) · derives from Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006), ed. francés 1996 · Jack Cain (tradujo) · Destiny Books (imprimio) · Roger Gallois (comento)

Claims

714 entries — the work's own voice, with its passage

«Toward the middle of the nineteenth century, groups of occultists appeared that were characterized by their attempts, using metaphysical speculation and experiments that today would be termed paranormal, to validate the idea of survival after death and to give a meaning to life.»Dubois abre el libro fechando a mediados del siglo XIX la aparición de grupos ocultistas y describiendo su empresa como doble: especulación metafísica y experimentos que hoy se llamarían paranormales, puestos al servicio de validar la supervivencia tras la muerte y de dar sentido a la vida.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«Europe was following the path of symbolism and meditation. In this, people were reacting to the positivism of Auguste Comte. This philosophy, developed between 1830 and 1842, countering romantic lyricism and influenced by the progress of the biological sciences, held that it was necessary to limit knowledge to truths based on observation and experiment and to abandon the attempt to know the essence of things.»Dubois lee ese giro como reacción al positivismo de Auguste Comte, cuya filosofía data entre 1830 y 1842 y cuya exigencia resume así: limitar el conocimiento a lo observable y experimentable y renunciar a la esencia de las cosas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«It was then that there arose movements such as the spiritualism of Allan Kardec; Theosophy, which drew its inspiration from the Far East; and the Anthroposophism of Rudolf Steiner, which are among the best known.»Dubois nombra tres corrientes nacidas en esa coyuntura —el espiritismo de Allan Kardec, la teosofía de inspiración oriental y la antroposofía de Rudolf Steiner— y las presenta solo como las más conocidas, no como la lista entera.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«It should be noted that at the end of the eighteenth century and at the beginning of the nineteenth, the Encyclopedists tried to pull back from religious dogma, and the most eminent thinkers put forth the idea of conducting research separate from faith.»Dubois retrocede al cambio del siglo XVIII al XIX y señala en los enciclopedistas el intento de apartarse del dogma religioso y de investigar al margen de la fe.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«For example, one of these, Swedenborg, maintained that he had attained mystical experience as a result of science.»Dubois pone a Swedenborg de ejemplo de esa investigación al margen de la fe, por sostener que había alcanzado la experiencia mística por vía de la ciencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«Alchemy in this period appeared to have become obsolete. Its doctrine—as was the case, moreover, with the so-called occult sciences—had been dismissed since the second half of the seventeenth century with Descartes.»Dubois enuncia con reserva expresa —*appeared to*— la obsolescencia de la alquimia en ese periodo, y data en Descartes y en la segunda mitad del siglo XVII el descarte de su doctrina junto con el de las llamadas ciencias ocultas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«It seemed to have completely disappeared with the triumph of the chemistry of Lavoisier, for he proclaimed that a simple substance is indecomposable, a theory incompatible with the alchemical credo, which holds the opposite to be the case.»Dubois localiza el golpe decisivo en la química de Lavoisier y en su tesis de la sustancia simple indescomponible, incompatible con el credo alquímico, que sostiene lo contrario; conserva la reserva —*seemed to*— porque el capítulo entero va a argumentar que la desaparición no fue tal.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«The famous chemist meant to put an end to beliefs about the possibilities of transmutation. Science thus entertained the hope of penetrating the mysteries of nature.»Dubois atribuye a Lavoisier el propósito de acabar con la creencia en la transmutación, y describe lo que la ciencia esperaba de esa clausura.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«The century was not, however, so dismal as we might be led to believe. Some scholars appeared on the scene—Dom Pernety¹ and his Fables Égyptiennes et Grecques; Joseph Balsamo, known as Cagliostro; Count St. Germaina; Abbé Nicolas Lenglet-Dufresnoy;² and the famous Alliette,³ under his pseudonym Etteila (nearly an anagram of his name) —who left us three interesting treatises together with a Tarot.»Dubois objeta el cuadro de un siglo yermo y enumera a los eruditos que su relato le opone —Dom Pernety con sus *Fables Égyptiennes et Grecques*, Joseph Balsamo llamado Cagliostro, el conde de Saint-Germain, el abate Nicolas Lenglet-Dufresnoy y Alliette bajo el seudónimo Etteila—; la *a* pegada a *Germain* y los volados son las llamadas a nota que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«Isolated and in secret, some alchemists continued to search for the philosopher’s stone. One name that stands out clearly in the second half of the eighteenth century is James Price, the English doctor and chemist and member of the Royal Society. He made chemical discoveries and worked as an alchemist in his private laboratory, obtaining a powder that transmuted mercury and silver into gold.»Dubois sostiene una continuidad clandestina de la busca de la piedra y destaca a James Price, médico y químico inglés y miembro de la Royal Society, con laboratorio propio y un polvo que transmutaba mercurio y plata en oro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«Beginning in 1782, according to Sadoul, he performed public transmutations in the village of Gilford, where he had bought a manor. His end was tragic: Convinced that he would be taken for an impostor, he committed suicide.»Dubois data en 1782 las transmutaciones públicas de Price en Gilford y atribuye el dato a Sadoul; el suicidio lo explica por el temor de Price a pasar por impostor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 10»

«Curiosity was sustained and awakened by authors such as Goethe, born in 1749, who took a genuine interest in Hermeticism, the transmission of which he ensured. His Faust is an icon of esotericism.»Dubois cuenta entre quienes mantuvieron viva la curiosidad a Goethe, nacido en 1749, a quien atribuye interés genuino por el hermetismo y su transmisión, y llama a su *Faust* icono del esoterismo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«Nineteenth-century romantic literature seized upon the image of the alchemist, perverting it by promoting the antiquated image of a solitary and cursed magician.»Dubois objeta la imagen que el romanticismo hizo del alquimista: dice que se apropió de la figura y la pervirtió en mago solitario y maldito.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«A year later, in 1832, a little anonymous tract⁴ appeared under the title Hermès Dévoilé, dédié à la Postérité,⁵ published by Félix Locquin in Paris»Dubois data en 1832 el opúsculo anónimo *Hermès Dévoilé, dédié à la Postérité* publicado por Félix Locquin en París; el tramo se corta antes de la dirección porque el guion de fin de renglón de *Notre-Dame-des-Victoires* quedaría cosido dentro de las comillas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«The author signed his work “Ci . . .” at the end. He stated that he had obtained what he had been seeking after numerous false starts and after so many years: the elucidation of the alchemical Great Work.»Dubois consigna que el autor de ese opúsculo firmó con una abreviatura trunca y que declaraba haber obtenido, tras años y fracasos, la elucidación de la Gran Obra. La firma incompleta es el dato que después permitirá la conjetura sobre Cyliani.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«This book was considered, first by Fulcanelli and then by Eugène Canseliet, as the story of an adept whose word could be trusted.»Dubois señala que el libro fue tenido por relato de un adepto fiable primero por Fulcanelli y luego por Canseliet, en ese orden.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«It is true that this text, so touching in its enumeration of the misfortunes that befell this hermeticist, reveals a real mastery of the wet way and an acquaintance with exterior influences. Canseliet and Fulcanelli refer to it frequently.»Dubois suscribe en parte ese juicio: reconoce al texto dominio real de la vía húmeda y trato con las influencias exteriores, y anota que Canseliet y Fulcanelli lo citan a menudo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«In July of 1843, another Frenchman made known his deep interest in the science of Hermes: Louis-Paul-François Cambriel⁶ was seventy-nine years old at the time of the appearance of his nineteen-lesson course on the practice of the Great Work.»Dubois data en julio de 1843 el curso de diecinueve lecciones sobre la práctica de la Gran Obra de Louis-Paul-François Cambriel, que tenía entonces setenta y nueve años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«The chemist Chevreul criticized him very bluntly in a series of four articles that appeared in Le Journal des Savants beginning in May 1851.»Dubois registra la respuesta del químico Chevreul a Cambriel en cuatro artículos de *Le Journal des Savants* desde mayo de 1851.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«Chevreul had assembled one of the most extensive libraries of old alchemical manuscripts, which he left to the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris (Chevreul Collection).»Dubois añade el otro lado de ese mismo Chevreul: reunió una de las mayores bibliotecas de manuscritos alquímicos antiguos y la legó al Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de París.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«Then, in 1844, a small book by Alexandre Dumas, Un Alchimiste au XIXe siècle, was printed in Paris. This book dealt with a friend of the author’s, Viscount Henri de Ruolz, who was of German origin but whose family had lived in France for three centuries.»Dubois data en 1844 el *Un Alchimiste au XIXe siècle* de Alexandre Dumas y lo lee como relato sobre un amigo suyo, el vizconde Henri de Ruolz.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«A doctor of law and of medicine, Ruolz’s sole passions were music and chemistry. Though he opted for medicine, he actually began conducting alchemical experiments.»Dubois retrata a Ruolz como doctor en derecho y en medicina que acabó haciendo experimentos alquímicos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«Henri de Ruolz and Mont-Richer tried to make diamonds rather than gold, and they succeeded. The great-nephew of Franqueville, Dubreton (École Polytechnique 1901), affirms that Alexandre Dumas’s story is reliable.»Dubois consigna que Ruolz y Mont-Richer buscaban diamantes y no oro, y apoya la fiabilidad del relato de Dumas en el testimonio de Dubreton, sobrino nieto de Franqueville. La cadena de crédito es de tercera mano y la ficha la conserva como tal.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«During the same period, in 1850, there was published in England a curious book written by Mary Anne Atwood (maiden name: South) and entitled A Suggestive Inquiry into the Hermetic Mystery.»Dubois data en 1850 el *A Suggestive Inquiry into the Hermetic Mystery* de Mary Anne Atwood, de soltera South, publicado en Inglaterra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«First, she published an anonymous essay that caused quite a stir in esoteric circles: “Early Magnetism in Its Higher Relations to Humanity as Veiled in the Poets and the Prophets.”»Dubois antepone al libro un ensayo anónimo de Atwood sobre el magnetismo temprano, que dice haber causado revuelo en los círculos esotéricos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«At the age of thirty-seven, her book on alchemy was presented to the public. More than one hundred copies had been sold when, with the assistance of her father, she set up a bonfire on the lawn of their house in Gosport in order to burn the remaining books as well as those already sold that she was able to retrieve.»Dubois cuenta la retractación de Atwood: vendidos más de cien ejemplares, quemó con ayuda de su padre los restantes y los que pudo recuperar en el jardín de su casa de Gosport.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 11»

«however, must have escaped, for in 1918, an edition from W. Tait appeared with a preface by W. L. Wilmshurst. This edition was reprinted in 1960 in New York by the Julian Press.»Dubois deduce con reserva —*must have*— que algunos ejemplares se salvaron de la hoguera, y lo apoya en la edición de W. Tait de 1918 con prefacio de W. L. Wilmshurst y en su reimpresión neoyorquina de 1960. El tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana: empieza en la 11 con *A few copies*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 12»

«Mary Anne Atwood died in 1910 at the age of ninety-seven, having never spoken of this affair.»Dubois cierra el caso Atwood con la fecha de su muerte, en 1910 a los noventa y siete años, y con su silencio de toda la vida sobre el episodio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 12»

«We shall now enter the era into which the works of Fulcanelli thrust their roots: the domain of occultists and Freemasonry at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century.»Dubois delimita el terreno del capítulo —el ocultismo y la masonería francesas de fines del XIX y principios del XX— y lo declara el suelo del que salen los libros de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«Names introduced in italics are those of individuals who have a link to the Fulcanelli mystery.»Dubois declara una convención tipográfica que es su método en miniatura: la cursiva marca a quien tiene vínculo con el misterio, de modo que el lector va viendo formarse la red antes de que se argumente. La capa de texto no conserva la cursiva y la marca se pierde en el troceo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«The creation of numerous groups studying the esoteric sciences, along with their meeting places, meetings, and press publications, fostered the blossoming of an abundant literature. Individuals from all social classes who shared a similar enthusiasm were able to work side by side. There was an amazing burgeoning of ideas in which alchemy played a leading part.»Dubois caracteriza el medio por sus tres soportes —grupos, locales de reunión y prensa propia—, subraya la mezcla de clases sociales y da a la alquimia el papel principal en esa efervescencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«Strange characters appeared, studying in secret the art of Hermes. One among them, a shoemaker by trade, Rémi Pierret,b who occupied the concierge’s quarters at 12 passage Ménilmontant, Paris, had assembled one of the most important alchemical libraries of the nineteenth century.»Dubois pone por caso al zapatero Rémi Pierret, portero en el pasaje Ménilmontant, dueño de una de las grandes bibliotecas alquímicas del siglo; el ejemplo sostiene su tesis de que la alquimia sobrevivió fuera de las instituciones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«The likes of Papus,c Stanislas de Guaita, Albert Poisson, Victor-Émile Michelet, and Marc Havend very often paid him visits in order to discuss with him the passionate interest they shared.»Dubois nombra a los visitantes de esa portería —Papus, Guaita, Albert Poisson, Victor-Émile Michelet, Marc Haven—; las letras sueltas pegadas a los nombres son las llamadas a nota al pie que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«But the indisputable master of this era was the gentleman from Lorraine, Stanislas de Guaita, who died in 1897 at age thirty-eight.»Dubois da a Stanislas de Guaita por figura rectora de la época y consigna su muerte en 1897 a los treinta y ocho años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«A copy of his work La Clef de la Magie Noire (The Key to Black Magic) that had belonged to Jules Boucher was annotated by Fulcanelli on the pages dealing with alchemy.»Dubois consigna un ejemplar de *La Clef de la Magie Noire* de Guaita que perteneció a Jules Boucher y que lleva anotaciones de Fulcanelli en las páginas de alquimia: un objeto físico, y de los pocos que el caso ofrece.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«This information is given by Robert Amadou in his last article on the topic, entitled “L’Affaire Fulcanelli,” that appeared in the journal L’Autre Monde (Another World). In fact, the annotations in question are reproduced in this article.»Dubois atribuye ese dato a Robert Amadou y a su último artículo sobre el asunto en la revista *L’Autre Monde*, que reproduce las anotaciones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«In 1888, Stanislas de Guaita, with the help of Papus and Joséphin Péladan, decided to establish a new, so-called kabbalistic, Rosicrucian order of which the Supreme Council was to include six known members and six hidden members.»Dubois data en 1888 la fundación de la orden rosacruz llamada cabalística por Guaita con Papus y Péladan, y anota su consejo supremo mitad visible y mitad oculto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«After two years, Joséphin Péladan separated from Papus and Guaita to form the Esthetic and Catholic Rosicrucian Order, a sort of intellectual Tiers-Ordre.»Dubois data a dos años la escisión de Péladan y su Orden Rosacruz Estética y Católica, que describe como una suerte de tercera orden intelectual.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«Albert Poissone was an intimate friend of Stanislas de Guaita and had frequent exchanges with him. A bibliophile and a scholar, he became interested in alchemy at the age of twelve and browsed assiduously in used bookstores in order to uncover old treatises. He studied relentlessly during the morning in his apartment-laboratory on the rue Saint-Denis and in the afternoon earned his living at the laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine. Unfortunately, he was to die prematurely at the age of twenty-five, a victim of tuberculosis contracted in the army.»Dubois retrata a Albert Poisson, amigo íntimo de Guaita, aficionado a la alquimia desde los doce años, con jornada partida entre su piso-laboratorio de la rue Saint-Denis y el laboratorio de la Facultad de Medicina, muerto a los veinticinco de tuberculosis contraída en el ejército.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«The grand master was Guaita; Barletf and Papus subsequently replaced him. Oswald Wirth,² Lucien Lejay, and Paul Adam also belonged to the group, and later, Marc Haven, Augustin Chaboseau, and Sédirg (who resigned in 1909) were associated with it.»Dubois enumera la sucesión de la gran maestría rosacruz —Guaita, luego Barlet y Papus— y los nombres que orbitaron la orden, con la fecha de renuncia de Sédir en 1909.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«This movement was to attract a whole group of painters, writers, and musicians; among those who joined were Erik Satie; Alfred Jarry, who, influenced by hermetic symbolism»Dubois señala que la orden de Péladan atrajo a pintores, escritores y músicos, y nombra a Erik Satie y a Alfred Jarry, a quien atribuye influencia del simbolismo hermético; el tramo se corta ahí porque el cambio de plana parte la frase.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 13»

«Beginning in 1923, Joséphin Péladan further organized six Rosicrucian salons attended by Gauguin, Zola, and Verlaine. His initiative proved fortunate, for it helped to make known these artists and writers who subsequently became famous.»Dubois data en 1923 los seis salones rosacruces de Péladan, con Gauguin, Zola y Verlaine entre los asistentes, y les reconoce el efecto de dar a conocer a esos artistas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«As for Papus, it is clear that he was very active in esoteric circles during these years. He was familiar with the artistic high society of Paris and was a regular at the Chat Noir cabaret, which had been established and run by Rodolphe Salis and about whose sign Fulcanelli made an interesting comment in The Dwellings of the Philosophers.»Dubois sitúa a Papus en el Chat Noir de Rodolphe Salis y aprovecha para enlazar el cabaret con la obra que investiga: Fulcanelli comenta el letrero del local en *Les Demeures Philosophales*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«There Papus was to meet Ferdinand de Lesseps, Augusta Holmes, and the singer Emma Calvé, whose name is forever linked to the disturbing story of Rennes-le-Château.»Dubois hace del Chat Noir el lugar de encuentro de Papus con Ferdinand de Lesseps, Augusta Holmes y la cantante Emma Calvé, cuyo nombre asocia al asunto de Rennes-le-Château.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«We will see later how the name Emma Calvé can be shown to be connected to that of Fulcanelli.»Dubois anuncia que el nombre de Emma Calvé volverá enlazado al de Fulcanelli, y deja el enlace en promesa sin argumentarlo aquí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«For his part, France, in putting together his novel La Rôtisserie de la Reine Pédauque, borrowed complete pages from Montfaucon de Villars’s work Le Comte de Gabalis.»Dubois atribuye a Anatole France haber tomado páginas enteras del *Comte de Gabalis* de Montfaucon de Villars al componer *La Rôtisserie de la Reine Pédauque*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«Every Wednesday in Paris, society figures gathered at the home of the countess Gaston d’Adhémar. Among them could be found Papus,i Joséphin Péladan, the bookstore proprietor Edmond Bailly, Gary de Lacroze, and many others.»Dubois reconstruye el calendario del medio: los miércoles en casa de la condesa Gaston d’Adhémar, con Papus, Péladan y el librero Edmond Bailly entre los asiduos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«Starting in 1889, all these figures of the artistic high society of Paris went to dine every Thursday at the home of Georges Poirel, developer of a phototype process, on the rue de la Tour-d’Auvergne. Besides Papus, de Guaita, and Péladan, other invitees were Oswald Wirth, Émile Goudeau,j and Édouard Schuré.»Dubois pone los jueves desde 1889 en casa de Georges Poirel, inventor de un procedimiento fototípico, con Papus, Guaita, Péladan, Oswald Wirth y Édouard Schuré entre los invitados.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«Ideas were exchanged and someone spoke of the latest publications on alchemy—for example, Origines de l’Alchimie by Berthelot, or possibly the work of Louis Figuier, the famous historian of this discipline.»Dubois consigna qué se leía en esas cenas: los *Origines de l’Alchimie* de Berthelot y la obra de Louis Figuier, a quien llama el historiador famoso de la disciplina.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«Tiffereau also attracted attention; he was actually the leading figure in the field of alchemy.»Dubois da a Tiffereau por la figura principal del campo alquímico en esa coyuntura.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«Because they wanted to pursue these fruitful exchanges, the participants decided to form a group under the name Groupe Indépendant d’Études Ésotériques (Independent Group for Esoteric Studies). It began its functions on December 7, 1889, and continued until 1894, when it changed its name to the École Hermétique (Hermetic School).»Dubois data el Groupe Indépendant d’Études Ésotériques el 7 de diciembre de 1889 y su cambio de nombre a École Hermétique en 1894: de la tertulia sale una institución.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«At the urging of Papus and Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, Chamuel opened a shop as well as a library at the sign of the Librairie du Merveilleux (Bookstore of the Marvelous), 29 rue de Trévise, and, in the same street a little farther along, a room where lectures were held every week.»Dubois data la apertura de la Librairie du Merveilleux por Chamuel en el 29 de la rue de Trévise, a instancias de Papus y de Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, con una sala de conferencias semanales; esa librería es la que reaparecerá en el capítulo 4 en manos de Pierre Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«In 1888 Papus started the journal L’Initiation.l He was twenty-three years old. All the leading figures of the era wrote for it. This journal continued until 1912 and in 1891 was placed on the index [of forbidden books] by the Catholic Church.»Dubois data en 1888 la fundación de *L’Initiation* por un Papus de veintitrés años, su cierre en 1912 y su paso al índice de libros prohibidos en 1891; el corchete explicativo es del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«In 1890, Papus also began the Voile d’Isis, the mouthpiece of the Groupe Indépendant d’Études Ésotériques. Grillot de Givry⁶ was one of his collaborators.»Dubois data en 1890 el *Voile d’Isis* como órgano del Groupe Indépendant y cuenta a Grillot de Givry entre sus colaboradores.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 14»

«The Voile d’Isis was later named Les Études Traditionnelles.»Dubois consigna el cambio de nombre de esa revista a *Les Études Traditionnelles*, que es la que después dirigirá el círculo de Guénon.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Concurrently, Papus laid the foundations of the Martinist movement, which enjoyed prodigious growth from 1890 to 1914 in most European countries.»Dubois sitúa la fundación del martinismo por Papus en paralelo a lo anterior y le data un crecimiento europeo entre 1890 y 1914.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Papus was the president,⁷ receiving an initiation from Henri Delage. The lineage was as follows: Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin, Antoine Chaptal, Henri Delage,m Papus.»Dubois transcribe la cadena de transmisión con que el martinismo se legitima —Saint-Martin, Chaptal, Delage, Papus— y consigna que Papus recibió su iniciación de Delage.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«This lineage, which was subsequently contested, is given by Jean-Marie Parent and Roger Facon in Sectes et Sociétés Secrètes aujourd’hui»Dubois anota que ese linaje fue impugnado después y remite por él a Jean-Marie Parent y Roger Facon, con lo que da la cadena por dato controvertido y no por hecho.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«The members of the Martinist association met at the bookstore of the occultist Edmond Bailly, whose shop on the rue de la Chausséed’Antin, marked by the sign l’Art Indépendant, was frequented by both those from the Symbolist Movement and those fascinated by esotericism»Dubois pone la sede de hecho del martinismo en la librería l’Art Indépendant del ocultista Edmond Bailly, donde confluían simbolistas y esoteristas; *Chausséed’Antin* (sic) es la grafía sin guion que imprime la capa de texto aquí, mientras que en la plana 40 la misma calle sale con guion.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Edmond Bailly published the journals La Haute Science (The High Science) and L’Étoile (The Star); Jules Bois, the editor of these journals, was the lover of the singer Emma Calvé.»Dubois enlaza las revistas de Bailly con Jules Bois, su director, y a este con Emma Calvé: los vínculos personales son el hilo con que teje la red.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Into this cozy retreat thronged writers such as Huysmans, Mallarmé, Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, Félicien Rops, the painter Odilon Redon, Henri de Reigner, Pierre Louys, and the musicians Debussy, Erik Satie, and many others.»Dubois enumera la clientela literaria y musical de esa librería —Huysmans, Mallarmé, Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, Rops, Odilon Redon, Pierre Louÿs, Debussy, Satie— para medir hasta dónde llegaba el medio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«The accredited students of the École Hermétique (formerly the Groupe Indépendant d’Études Ésotériques) entered Martinist lodges called le Sphynx, la Sphynge, Hermanubus, and Véléda.»Dubois describe el paso reglado de la École Hermétique a las logias martinistas y nombra las cuatro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Martinism was supposed to have been the antechamber of a much older order, the H.B. of Luxor (Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor). In fact, this turned out not to be the case, and the Kabbalistic Rosicrucian Order became the inner circle.»Dubois recoge la creencia de que el martinismo era antecámara de la Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor y la niega, poniendo en ese lugar a la orden rosacruz cabalística.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«The route then became: École Hermétique to Martinism to the Kabbalistic Rosicrucian Order.»Dubois resume el itinerario iniciático corregido en tres escalones sucesivos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«After the death of its founder, Stanislas de Guaita, it was F. Ch. Barlet who became the grand master. When he resigned, Papus claimed to be the successor to Barlet and therefore grand master of the order, whereas Barlet had passed on the title and the archives to René Guénon.»Dubois consigna una disputa de sucesión sin arbitrarla: Papus se declaró sucesor de Barlet en la gran maestría cuando Barlet ya había pasado el título y los archivos a Guénon.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«F. Ch. Barlet (1838–1921) was the official representative in France of the H.B. of L. It was an extremely secretive fraternity revived around 1870.»Dubois da a Barlet por representante oficial en Francia de la H.B. of L. y data hacia 1870 la reactivación de esa fraternidad, que llama extremadamente secreta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Peter Davidson was one of the leaders and Max Théon, a strange individual, was the adept.»Dubois distingue dos papeles dentro de la H.B. of L.: Peter Davidson entre los dirigentes y Max Théon como el adepto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«The H.B. of Luxor was the outer shell of a very old center of initiation. Close to thirty thousand intellectuals were affiliated with the brotherhood, one of whom was Abraham Lincoln. Members could be found in Scotland, Egypt, and America.»Dubois presenta la H.B. of Luxor como envoltura exterior de un centro de iniciación muy antiguo, le atribuye cerca de treinta mil afiliados intelectuales repartidos entre Escocia, Egipto y América, y cuenta a Abraham Lincoln entre ellos, sin dar fuente para esa afiliación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«The teaching related to a practice intended to develop spiritual faculties and was based on the theories and practices of P. B. Randolph, author of the well-known Magia Sexualis.»Dubois describe la enseñanza de la H.B. of L. como práctica para desarrollar facultades espirituales y la deriva de las teorías de P. B. Randolph, autor de *Magia Sexualis*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«Serge Hutin assures us in his book Paul Sédir, Histoire des Rose-Croix (Paul Sédir: History of the Rosicrucians) that Randolph was a member of this fraternity, and Pierre Mariel, in his Dictionnaire des Sociétés Secrètes (Dictionary of Secret Societies), notes that Papus, Chaboseau, and Marc Haven were as well.»Dubois adjudica cada afiliación a quien la afirma: la de Randolph a Serge Hutin en su historia de los rosacruces, y las de Papus, Chaboseau y Marc Haven a Pierre Mariel en su diccionario de sociedades secretas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 15»

«But let us return to the École Hermétique (formerly Groupe Indépendant d’Études Ésotériques), which ran courses four times a week at 13 rue Séguier.»Dubois vuelve a la École Hermétique y la describe en su funcionamiento material: cursos cuatro veces por semana en el 13 de la rue Séguier.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«The proceedings were conducted by F. Ch. Barlet, Papus, Sédir, Phaneg, and so forth, and among the students was Jollivet-Castelot, who met most of the occultists of his time this way. He joined the Martinist Society.»Dubois nombra a los docentes de la escuela y destaca entre los alumnos a Jollivet-Castelot, para quien esos cursos fueron la puerta de entrada al medio ocultista y al martinismo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«In his largely autobiographical book, Le Destin (Destiny), he competently describes the most famous figures of the 1890s.»Dubois presenta *Le Destin* de Jollivet-Castelot como libro en buena medida autobiográfico y como su fuente para los retratos que siguen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«Papus is described as “jovial, cordial, with a somewhat common exterior and an untidy appearance . . . occupying lodgings at Auteuil, Villa Montmorency.”»Dubois transcribe el retrato que Jollivet-Castelot hace de Papus, con domicilio incluido; los puntos suspensivos son de la cita.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«Sédir was seen as “an often arcane lecturer, looking down on his listeners, living in a garret on the avenue de l’Opéra.”»Dubois transcribe el retrato de Sédir que da Jollivet-Castelot: conferenciante oscuro y altivo, alojado en una buhardilla de la avenue de l’Opéra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«Guaita is described as being “thickset, authoritarian, disdainful of the commonplace.”»Dubois transcribe el retrato de Guaita que da Jollivet-Castelot, en tres adjetivos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«Also, we learn that Saint-Yves d’Alveydre lived “in a sumptuous residence in Versailles, peaceful and furnished luxuriously. He received visitors in a little salon adjacent to his study; he spoke quietly and well and dressed in purple velvet.”»Dubois transcribe el retrato de Saint-Yves d’Alveydre que da Jollivet-Castelot, con su residencia de Versalles y su terciopelo morado: el detalle sirve para medir la distancia social dentro del mismo medio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«In 1896, Jollivet-Castelot formed the Société Alchimique de France and launched the journal L’Hyperchimie—a monthly journal of alchemy, hermetic science, and spagyric medicine.»Dubois data en 1896 la Société Alchimique de France y su revista *L’Hyperchimie*, mensual de alquimia, ciencia hermética y medicina espagírica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«It appeared regularly for about ten years. Sédir was the editor in chief and Jollivet-Castelot the director. In 1904 it was revamped and took the name Nouveaux Horizons de la Science et de la Pensée (New Horizons in Science and Thought); it continued to be published until 1914. After 1920, it became La Rose-Croix (The Rosy Cross).»Dubois sigue la revista de Jollivet-Castelot por sus tres nombres sucesivos, con Sédir de redactor jefe y él de director, hasta su conversión en *La Rose-Croix* después de 1920.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«In 1939, Jollivet-Castelot died at Douai after having generated a great deal of press due to his experiments with transmutation and the making of gold. The recipe was generously revealed in his journal, and an engineer from Lyons successfully repeated his experiments.»Dubois data en 1939 la muerte de Jollivet-Castelot en Douai y consigna, sin tomar postura sobre el resultado, que publicó su receta de transmutación en su propia revista y que un ingeniero de Lyon repitió los experimentos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«Jollivet-Castelot, the “hyperchemist,” left us several publications, including Comment On devient alchimiste (How One Becomes an Alchemist) in 1897»Dubois llama hiperquímico a Jollivet-Castelot y data en 1897 su *Comment On devient alchimiste*; el tramo se corta ahí porque el límite de chunk parte la frase, y el segundo título —*La Science alchimiste*, de 1901— queda del otro lado del corte.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«During the same period, in 1898, a Spaniard, Antonio de Paula Novellas y Roig, published the text of a lecture, “L’Alchimie et les Alchimistes” (Alchemy and the Alchemists), that he had delivered to the Groupe Scolaire Raymond Lulle¹² in Barcelona.»Dubois data en 1898 la conferencia sobre la alquimia que Antonio de Paula Novellas y Roig dio en el Groupe Scolaire Raymond Lulle de Barcelona, con lo que extiende el mapa del renacimiento alquímico fuera de Francia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«He professed to be passionate about spagyric methods, notably a preparation called La Thériaquen He was an astonishing man who frequented the scientific circles of his time and professed theories derived from the ancient hermetic tradition.»Dubois atribuye a Novellas y Roig la afición a los métodos espagíricos, en particular a una preparación llamada La Thériaque, y el trato con los círculos científicos de su tiempo; la *n* pegada al nombre de la preparación es la llamada a nota que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«We will now sketch the connections that René Guénon maintained with these esoteric circles and show the close ties that linked him to the small group in which the works signed “Fulcanelli” were developed.»Dubois enuncia aquí lo que persigue el resto del capítulo: los lazos de René Guénon con el pequeño grupo donde, sostiene, se elaboraron las obras firmadas con el seudónimo. Es la primera formulación de su tesis y llega antes de la prueba.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«At the beginning of 1908, René Guénon, who was taking courses at the École Hermétique that were given by Papus and his friends, joined the Martinist Order.»Dubois data a principios de 1908 el ingreso de Guénon en la Orden Martinista, saliendo de los cursos de la École Hermétique de Papus.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«Some younger members met at a hotel at 17 rue des Canettes in Paris. They practiced automatic writing, and a certain Jean Desjobert acted as a medium.»Dubois localiza en un hotel del 17 de la rue des Canettes al grupo de martinistas jóvenes que practicaba escritura automática con Jean Desjobert de médium.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«This little group was noteworthy by the presence at its core of Lucien Faugeron, disciple in hermetic science of Pierre Dujols; and Alexandre Thomas, the associate of the same Pierre Dujols at the Librairie du Merveilleux.»Dubois señala por qué ese grupo importa a su investigación: en su núcleo estaban Lucien Faugeron, discípulo de Dujols en ciencia hermética, y Alexandre Thomas, socio de Dujols en la Librairie du Merveilleux.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«During a séance, the pseudo-entity who spoke through the medium Desjobert gave the order to bring René Guénon to the next séance. He came and was exhorted to create an Ordre du Temple Rénové (Order of the Temple Renewed) of which he was to be the head.»Dubois cuenta que la orden de fundar el Ordre du Temple Rénové con Guénon a la cabeza salió de una sesión mediúmnica; llama pseudoentidad a lo que hablaba por el médium, con lo que consigna la escena sin conceder la comunicación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 16»

«On February 23, 1908, the ritual of this new Ordre du Temple was laid down with seven grades and twelve members.»Dubois data el 23 de febrero de 1908 la fijación del ritual de la orden nueva, con siete grados y doce miembros.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«The founding of this movement finalized the break between Guénon and Papus, who excluded Guénon from his groups.»Dubois hace de esa fundación la ruptura definitiva entre Guénon y Papus, que lo excluyó de sus grupos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«But in 1911, the “masters” who controlled the medium ordered René Guénon to dissolve the order. This was done.»Dubois data en 1911 la disolución de la orden por mandato de los maestros que gobernaban al médium, y pone la palabra entre comillas del original.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«According to André Gilis,¹³ this ephemeral revival of the Ordre du Temple was the privileged ground from which the work of Guénon sprang forth.»Dubois atribuye a André Gilis la lectura de ese episodio efímero como terreno del que brota la obra de Guénon, y la da como suya de él.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«A related influence was the mediumistic séances of the Mouvement Cosmique, founded in 1900 by Max Théon after the disbanding of the H.B. of L (1887–88).»Dubois data en 1900 el Mouvement Cosmique de Max Théon y lo hace suceder a la disolución de la H.B. of L. en 1887-88.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«F. Ch. Barlet supported the diffusion of the ideas coming from this movement by means of meetings and a journal called La Revue Cosmique.»Dubois atribuye a Barlet la difusión de las ideas del Mouvement Cosmique por reuniones y por *La Revue Cosmique*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«Among them were Anna de Noailles, Édouard Schuré, the Hellenist Mario Meunier, and Dr. Serge Voronoff, who was connected to Jean-Julien Champagne by an incident recounted by Robert Ambelain, which we will speak about again later.»Dubois nombra a los apoyos del movimiento y anuncia por primera vez a Jean-Julien Champagne, enlazado al doctor Serge Voronoff por un incidente que atribuye al relato de Robert Ambelain.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«Max Théon, founder of the Mouvement Cosmique and an adept of the defunct H.B. of Luxor, traveled to France in 1888 and to Paris in 1920. He claimed to be an initiate who had achieved earthly immortality, and he seemed to possess numerous powers.»Dubois traza el itinerario de Max Théon y conserva la distancia en las dos cláusulas: él se declaraba iniciado con inmortalidad terrestre, y sus poderes los da solo por aparentes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«From a state of contemplation, his wife, an Irish poetess, wrote the texts of the Cosmic Philosophy. She died in 1908 during a trip to Jersey.»Dubois atribuye los textos de la Filosofía Cósmica a la mujer de Théon, poetisa irlandesa, escritos en estado de contemplación, y data su muerte en 1908.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«According to Pierre Geyraud, “the guardian of Cosmic Philosophy originated in Tunisia; his name, Aia Aziz, was often replaced in the Revue Cosmique by his emblem, a lotus.”»Dubois cita a Pierre Geyraud sobre el origen tunecino del guardián de la Filosofía Cósmica y sobre el nombre Aia Aziz, sustituido a menudo en la revista por un loto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«In 1911, René Guénon entered the Thébah Lodge of the Grand Lodge of France, conforming to the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. He had been refused by the lodge called Travail et Vrais Amis Fidèles (Work and True Faithful Friends). In 1917 at the latest, he ended his Masonic activities.»Dubois data el paso masónico de Guénon: entrada en la logia Thébah en 1911 tras el rechazo de otra logia, y cese de la actividad en 1917 a más tardar.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«At the same time, he applied for admission to the Église Gnostique (gnostic church), excommunicated by Rome, which was formed at the end of the nineteenth century by Jules Doinel, then directed by Fabre des Essarts (Synésius).»Dubois sitúa en paralelo el ingreso de Guénon en la Iglesia Gnóstica fundada por Jules Doinel y dirigida entonces por Fabre des Essarts, y anota su excomunión por Roma.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«The young Guénon, under the initiatory name Palingénius (with a homophonic wink to his given name: rené = renaît = reborn),p became its bishop in 1909.»Dubois data en 1909 el obispado gnóstico de Guénon y descifra su nombre iniciático como guiño homófono a su nombre de pila; el paréntesis con la ecuación y la *p* de llamada a nota son del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«In November 1909, Guénon, still using the pseudonym Palingénius and in collaboration with others from the Ordre du Temple Rénové, notably A. Thomas (initiatory name: Marnès), created the journal La Gnose (Gnosis, 1909–12), published by the Librairie du Merveilleux, which was run by Pierre Dujols and Thomas.»Dubois data en noviembre de 1909 la revista *La Gnose*, hecha con gente del Ordre du Temple Rénové y publicada por la Librairie du Merveilleux de Dujols y Thomas: el enlace editorial entre Guénon y la librería de Dujols es el eslabón que le interesa.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«At the great Spiritualist and Masonic Conference of 1908, René Guénon was the office secretary and wore the silk cordon of Kadosh of the Swedenborgian Rite.»Dubois sitúa a Guénon de secretario de oficina en el congreso espiritualista y masónico de 1908, con el cordón de Kadosh del rito swedenborgiano.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«Now we shall outline here the connections among the alchemists and thinkers of different countries.»Dubois anuncia el tramo internacional del capítulo, que saca la red de París y la lleva a Italia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 17»

«devoted to the exposition of initiatory doctrine. Arturo Reghinir directed them and contributed as well to the Voile d’Isis.»Dubois presenta las dos revistas italianas de doctrina iniciática dirigidas por Arturo Reghini, colaborador también del *Voile d’Isis*; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana y empieza en la 17 con la datación de *Athanor* e *Ignis* en 1924 y 1927.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«It was he who introduced René Guénon to Julius Evola,s who was at the time head of the group called Ur, which published monographs in which the articles were signed with pseudonyms: EA was the pseudonym of Evola; Pietro Negri was that of Arturo Reghini; Luce was the pen name of G. Parise; Leo was used by the anthroposophist Colazza; and the appellation Abraxas was taken by the hermeticist Ercole Quadrelli.»Dubois hace de Reghini el eslabón entre Guénon y Julius Evola, entonces al frente del grupo Ur, y descifra los seudónimos con que firmaban sus monografías.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«The Ur group published ten issues in 1927, two of which were double, and eight issues in 1928, two of which were double and one of which was triple. It was in October 1928 that the two directors of the journal, Reghini and Parise, departed.»Dubois cuenta los números del grupo Ur año por año y data en octubre de 1928 la salida de Reghini y Parise.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«Evola claimed that these two directors wanted to snatch away from him the publication of monographs by Ur so that they would be controlled by individuals who were keeping Freemasonry alive at a time when it was illegal in Italy.»Dubois da la versión de Evola sobre esa ruptura como reclamación suya —*claimed*— y no como hecho: los dos directores habrían querido arrebatarle las monografías para ponerlas en manos de quienes mantenían viva una masonería entonces ilegal en Italia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«After this break, Evola alone remained responsible for the journal, which took the name Krur. Its last issue appeared in 1929.»Dubois cierra el episodio italiano con el cambio de nombre de la revista a *Krur* bajo Evola solo y su último número en 1929.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«In 1928 the Chacornac brothers offered to René Guénon the directorship of the journal Le Voile d’Isis, for which Grillot de Givry¹⁵ was writing from time to time, though Guénon wanted to be just the editor.»Dubois data en 1928 el ofrecimiento de los hermanos Chacornac a Guénon de dirigir *Le Voile d’Isis*, y anota que él prefirió quedarse en redactor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«Under the evocative pseudonym Mercuranus, he also wrote for La Gnose, published by the Librairie du Merveilleux, which was owned by Dujols and Thomas.»Dubois consigna que Patrice Gentil firmaba Mercuranus en *La Gnose*, publicada por la librería de Dujols y Thomas, y vuelve así por tercera vez al mismo local.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«He worked for the gas company as a meter reader, which allowed him to meet others who might have been, like himself, interested in Tradition.»Dubois anota el oficio de Gentil —lector de contadores de la compañía del gas— como recurso para conocer a otros interesados en la Tradición.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«There were also ties between René Guénon and Madame Dina. Heiress to one of America’s largest fortunes, Madame Dina was the wife of an alchemist whose work was just beginning to become known.»Dubois abre el episodio Dina presentando a la heredera de una de las mayores fortunas americanas casada con un alquimista poco conocido entonces.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«Assan Farid Dina, of East Indian origin, was an electrical engineer, philosopher, and specialist in the religions and philosophies of India who gave lectures in Paris in 1911–12.»Dubois identifica a Assan Farid Dina como ingeniero eléctrico, filósofo y especialista en religiones de la India, con conferencias en París en 1911-12.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«Assan Farid Dina transformed, modernized, and decorated the Château des Avenières at Cruseilles near Annecy»Dubois atribuye a Assan Farid Dina la transformación y decoración del Château des Avenières en Cruseilles, cerca de Annecy.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«In the chapel of this residence, gold-leaf mosaics representing the major arcana of the Tarot (see fig. 2.2) were discovered in 1967 by Bertrand Jacquet in the presence of several witnesses.»Dubois data en 1967 el hallazgo por Bertrand Jacquet, ante varios testigos, de los mosaicos de pan de oro con los arcanos mayores del Tarot en la capilla de esa casa.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«It was the first time in the history of hermetic art that a chapel dedicated to the Tarot had been created using astonishing images from the cards.»Dubois da esa capilla por la primera de la historia del arte hermético dedicada al Tarot con las imágenes de las cartas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«In 1978, in another chateau belonging to Dina, at Bar-sur-Seine, near Troyes, a temple to the Tarot (incorporating bas-reliefs representing the minor arcana) was discovered, as was his first alchemical book, La Science Philosophique (Philosophic Science), published in 1917 under the pseudonym A. M. A., and his second book, La Destinée: La Mort et Ses Hypothèses (Destiny, Death, and Their Hypotheses), published in 1927 under his real name just shortly before his passing.»Dubois data en 1978 el hallazgo, en el otro castillo de Dina en Bar-sur-Seine, de un templo del Tarot con bajorrelieves de los arcanos menores y de sus dos libros: *La Science Philosophique* de 1917 firmada A. M. A. y *La Destinée* de 1927 con su nombre real.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 18»

«Dina is said to be buried in Egypt, but in fact the mystery of his death and the location of his tomb has never been solved.»Dubois marca como rumor —*is said to*— el entierro de Dina en Egipto y declara sin resolver el misterio de su muerte y de su tumba.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«After the death of her husband, Madame Dina founded the Véga Bookstore at 43 rue Madame, and took on René Guénon as director of her series “L’Anneau d’Or” (The Golden Ring), which she had created for him.»Dubois consigna que Madame Dina fundó la librería Véga en el 43 de la rue Madame y puso a Guénon al frente de una colección creada para él.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«She came close to embarking on a second marriage with him and lived with him for several months at Avenières.»Dubois consigna la relación personal de Madame Dina con Guénon, a punto de segundo matrimonio y con varios meses de convivencia en Avenières.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«René Guénon, accompanied by Madame Dina, left for Egypt on March 5, 1930, in an effort to find Sufi texts for the series. Because the sojourn there took longer than expected, however, Madame Dina had to return to Paris alone.»Dubois data el 5 de marzo de 1930 el viaje de Guénon a Egipto en busca de textos sufíes para la colección, y explica por su duración el regreso solo de Madame Dina.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«Upon her return, she met Ernest Britt at the home of Dr. Rouhier, the commercial director of Véga, and the two were married.»Dubois sitúa el encuentro de Madame Dina con Ernest Britt en casa del doctor Rouhier, director comercial de Véga, y su boda.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«Her new husband hated René Guénon and was the cause of the break between him and Madame Dina. She stopped sending Guénon money and turned over to Dr. Rouhier the management of the bookstore and its publishing house, Éditions Véga.»Dubois hace de la animadversión de Britt la causa de la ruptura con Guénon, del corte del dinero y del traspaso de la librería y de Éditions Véga a Rouhier.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«This turn of events placed René Guénon in a difficult financial situation.»Dubois consigna la consecuencia económica de ese giro para Guénon, que es lo que precipita su instalación definitiva en Egipto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«Ernest Britt, firm friend of Oswald Wirth, belonged to a group of occultists that also included Piobb (Pierre Vincenti).»Dubois devuelve a Britt a la misma red: amigo de Oswald Wirth y miembro de un grupo ocultista con Piobb.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«As for Alexandre Rouhier,u he too belonged to a secret society, called Le Grand Lunaire (The Great Lunary), which based its work on books by René Schwaller de Lubicz, Crowley, and Fulcanelli.»Dubois adscribe a Rouhier a la sociedad secreta Le Grand Lunaire, cuyo trabajo dice basado en libros de Schwaller de Lubicz, de Crowley y de Fulcanelli: los tres nombres juntos son ya la constelación que el libro persigue.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 19»

«Robert Ambelain informs us about the participants in this strange assembly and mentions Jules Boucher and Jean-Julien Champagne (fig. 2.3), as well as Gaston Sauvage, who directed the Grand Lunaire’s section on black and satanic magic. The baphomet served as their emblem.»Dubois atribuye a Robert Ambelain la nómina del Grand Lunaire —Jules Boucher, Jean-Julien Champagne y Gaston Sauvage, este al frente de la sección de magia negra y satánica— y anota el bafometo por emblema.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 20»

«It is said that when Jules Boucher left the Grand Lunaire—with difficulty, it should be noted—he had to have himself exorcised at Lyons by the gnostic bishop Monseigneur Jean Bricaud. He was terrorized by the members of this society, especially by Gaston Sauvage.»Dubois marca como rumor —*it is said*— el exorcismo de Jules Boucher en Lyon a manos del obispo gnóstico Jean Bricaud tras su salida difícil del Grand Lunaire, y su terror ante los miembros de la sociedad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 20»

«It should be mentioned that he had been subjected to the Ceremony of the Curse.»Dubois añade que Boucher había pasado por la Ceremonia de la Maldición, sin describirla ni dar fuente.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 20»

«On the back of the painting is the date May 6, 1902, the number 136, and a red seal with the inscription “Julien Champagne, artist-painter, Paris”.»[pie de lámina] la fig. 2.3 reproduce un autorretrato de Champagne a los veinticinco años, y el pie describe lo que lleva el reverso del cuadro: fecha, número y sello rojo con su firma de pintor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 21»

«In Robert Amadou’s Feu du Soleil (The Fire of the Sun), Eugène Canseliet gives Rouhier, Boucher, and Champagne as members of the Grand Lunaire.»Dubois hace confluir dos testimonios sobre la misma nómina: la de Canseliet en el *Feu du Soleil* de Robert Amadou coincide con la de Ambelain en Rouhier, Boucher y Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 21»

«He claims that Champagne allowed himself to be dragged into a deplorable collaboration, and that Rouhier and Boucher “often went at night to the dolmen of Meudon, armed with their portable occultum from the Grand Lunaire.”»Dubois transcribe la versión de Canseliet, que descarga a Champagne llamando deplorable la colaboración a la que se dejó arrastrar y carga sobre Rouhier y Boucher las salidas nocturnas al dolmen de Meudon. La reserva —*He claims*— es de Dubois y la ficha la conserva.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 21»

«We have just viewed a picture of the occultist ferment at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth. In this we have been able to identify most of the players who participated in the creation of the most fabulous legend there has ever been: the myth of the adept Fulcanelli.»Dubois cierra el cuadro del medio ocultista declarando identificados a casi todos los actores y llamando mito al adepto Fulcanelli, con lo que fija desde el principio en qué registro va a tratarlo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«It is appropriate first to point out that for a long time—since the sixteenth century, in fact—Gothic architecture had been considered barbaric.»Dubois data desde el siglo XVI la consideración de la arquitectura gótica como bárbara, para medir después el cambio de valoración.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«This was true to such an extent that during the French Revolution, a decree was issued ordering the destruction of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris.»Dubois pone por medida de ese desprecio el decreto revolucionario que ordenaba destruir Notre-Dame.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«We owe the preservation of this marvelous edifice to the intelligence of one man: Charles-François Dupuy pointed out that the cathedral’s sculptures contained teachings on science, art, and philosophy, and, in doing so, saved it from destruction.»Dubois atribuye la salvación del edificio al argumento de Charles-François Dupuy, que alegó que las esculturas contenían enseñanzas de ciencia, arte y filosofía: la lectura simbólica de la catedral nace, en su relato, como recurso para salvarla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«In 1831, Victor Hugo published his novel Notre-Dame-de-Paris. In its composition he had drawn from material in alchemical works—but he allowed an odor of sulfur to emanate from his philosopher of hermetic science.»Dubois data en 1831 la novela de Hugo, le reconoce material alquímico y le objeta a la vez el olor a azufre con que envuelve a su filósofo hermético.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«It was thanks to this book, however, that public opinion was sensitized and that the architect Viollet-le-Duc was able to undertake restoration work on the building starting in 1845.»Dubois atribuye a esa misma novela la sensibilización del público y, con ella, la restauración que Viollet-le-Duc emprendió desde 1845.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«In his Cours de Philosophie Hermétique (Course in Hermetic Philosophy), François Cambriel presented this monument as an edifice with an alchemical character.»Dubois cuenta el *Cours de Philosophie Hermétique* de François Cambriel entre los antecedentes de la lectura alquímica de Notre-Dame.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«Before him, Esprit Gobineau de Montluisant² had already addressed this question in his book in which he reveals the hermetic aspects of Notre Dame.»Dubois antepone a Cambriel el libro de Esprit Gobineau de Montluisant sobre los aspectos herméticos de Notre-Dame, con lo que hace de la lectura hermética de la catedral una tradición anterior a Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 23»

«On January 23, 1877, at 10:10 in the morning, when Jean-Julien Champagne was born at Levallois-Perret in the département of the Seine, his parents, both twenty-three years old, had no idea that their child would lead a life that was out of the ordinary, and that he would leave a mark on history.»Dubois abre el capítulo con el nacimiento de Jean-Julien Champagne en Levallois-Perret el 23 de enero de 1877 a las 10:10, con hora exacta porque el apéndice I levantará su carta natal sobre ese dato.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 24»

«In fact, he was to be the actor in a prodigious adventure connected with humanity’s most fabulous myth: that of the philosopher’s stone.»Dubois anticipa el papel que dará a Champagne y llama mito, no ciencia, a la piedra filosofal en la que va a intervenir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 24»

«Fifteen years earlier, at Saint-Illide in the Cantal region, on March 22, 1862, at 7:00 a.m., Pierre Dujolsa was born. He belonged to one of the most illustrious families in France: the Valois.»Dubois data el nacimiento de Pierre Dujols en Saint-Illide el 22 de marzo de 1862 a las siete y adscribe a la casa de Valois: la pretensión dinástica queda enunciada aquí y se documentará por el opúsculo de su hermano Antoine en la plana 29.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 24»

«At that time his father was engaged in the trade of shoemaker, and his mother, Toinette Lapeyre, was not engaged in a profession. Pierre was the youngest of three children; in 1862 his father was forty and his mother forty-four.»Dubois pone al lado de esa pretensión la condición real de la familia, con el padre zapatero y la madre sin profesión, sin comentar el contraste.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 24»

«These two individuals—Champagne and Dujols—whose paths ought not to have crossed, sought out each other’s company and formed a remarkable and complementary tandem.»Dubois enuncia el par que estructura todo el libro y lo llama complementario: dos hombres cuyos caminos no debían cruzarse y que se buscaron.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 24»

«With his mother’s help, Jean-Julien Champagne, scarcely sixteen years of age and fascinated by the study of ancient alchemical texts, installed a laboratory in the family»Dubois data a los dieciséis años el laboratorio que Champagne montó con ayuda de su madre en la casa familiar, ya con los textos alquímicos antiguos por afición; el tramo se corta porque el cambio de plana parte la frase, que sigue con *home at Villiers-le-Bel*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 24»

«There he devoted himself to his favorite pastime and acquired skills that would later be very useful for his experiments and would allow him to become a functioning alchemist of prime quality.»Dubois atribuye a esa práctica temprana la destreza de laboratorio de Champagne y lo llama alquimista operante de primer orden: la competencia técnica que le reconoce es una pieza de su tesis.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 25»

«He continued to study passionately in Parisian libraries, where precious manuscripts are ferreted away. At the same time, he registered at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris.»Dubois hace correr en paralelo las dos formaciones de Champagne, la de los manuscritos de las bibliotecas parisinas y la de la École des Beaux-Arts.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 25»

«His registration card, number 5996, informs us of his progress as a student of the painter Léon Gérôme.»Dubois apoya en un documento de archivo —la ficha de matrícula número 5996— la formación de Champagne con el pintor Léon Gérôme.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 25»

«In 1900 he graduated from the École Nationale et Spéciale des Beaux-Arts. He was twenty-three years old, an attractive man of medium build, 5 feet 7 inches tall, with a mustache. He had great success with the ladies, which continued all his life.»Dubois data en 1900 la titulación de Champagne y da su retrato físico con precisión de expediente.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 25»

«From this period, an excellent painting has survived depicting the bishop of Bordeaux.»Dubois inventaría lo que queda de la obra pictórica de Champagne de esos años y cita el retrato del obispo de Burdeos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 25»

«There are also three of his watercolors from 1895 (see fig. 4.3) and a photograph of a very beautiful miniature pendulum clock that he carved to represent a Gothic church, thereby demonstrating his early interest in the Middle Ages»Dubois suma tres acuarelas de 1895 y un reloj de sobremesa tallado en forma de iglesia gótica, y lee en esa pieza el interés temprano de Champagne por la Edad Media, que es la materia de *Le Mystère des Cathédrales*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 25»

«The era was rife with possibilities. Numerous personalities gathered in specialized shops, attracted by the mutual desire of meeting and studying together.»Dubois hace de la librería especializada la institución característica del medio: el lugar donde la gente coincidía y estudiaba junta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 27»

«One such place, the Librairie du Merveilleux (Bookstore of the Marvelous), founded by Chamuel, was located at 76 rue de Rennes in the 6th arrondissement of Paris.»Dubois sitúa la Librairie du Merveilleux fundada por Chamuel en el 76 de la rue de Rennes; en la plana 14 la había dado en la rue de Trévise, y aquí registra el traslado sin armonizar las dos direcciones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 27»

«It was taken over by Pierre Dujols and Alexandre Thomas and moved to this location, becoming, during the years 1910–11, the gathering place of Hellenistic scholars and well-known Kabbalists.»Dubois data en 1910-11 el paso de la librería a manos de Dujols y Thomas y su conversión en punto de reunión de helenistas y cabalistas: ese local es el centro de gravedad de toda su reconstrucción.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 27»

«René Guénon), Paul Chacornac describes this place for us. On entering, the visitor passed a wrought-iron portico and then crossed a flagstone courtyard in front of the building; the bookstore occupied the second floor, within the staff quarters of the former Chemilly Hotel.»Dubois toma de *La Vie Simple de René Guénon* de Paul Chacornac la descripción física de la librería, en el segundo piso del antiguo hotel de Chemilly; el tramo arranca con el cierre del paréntesis del título porque el cambio de plana parte la frase.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«In this setting ideas circulated concerning a famous language of signs, forgotten but not lost, called la langue verte, “the green tongue,” or the language of the birds.»Dubois señala qué se discutía en ese local: la lengua verde o lengua de los pájaros, que llama olvidada pero no perdida. Es la clave de lectura que los libros de Fulcanelli emplearán.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«The master of these quarters, Pierre Dujols, was a scholar of Greek literature and a staunch defender of the Hellenic language, which he insisted was the origin of the French language, and which allowed him, through the etymology of alchemical terms that it provided, to apply a particular calculation called the hermetic cabala to words and expressions and, by means of this device, to find a precise meaning that was helpful to laboratory work.»Dubois describe el procedimiento de Dujols: helenista convencido de que el griego es origen del francés, aplicaba por la etimología de los términos alquímicos un cálculo llamado cábala hermética para sacar de las palabras un sentido útil al trabajo de laboratorio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«He maintained a one-of-a-kind archive on occult sciences that his friend Jean-Julien Champagne later used.»Dubois consigna el archivo único de ciencias ocultas de Dujols y su uso posterior por Champagne, dato que sostiene la parte documental de su tesis.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«For the time being, his disciple in hermetic science, Faugeronb (at the time a traveling salesman living at 6 rue des Sabots), was responsible for updating this resource.»Dubois pone al día de ese archivo a Faugeron, discípulo de Dujols en ciencia hermética y entonces viajante de comercio, con su domicilio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«This same Faugeron, along with Alexandre Thomas, belonged to René Guénon’s Ordre du Temple Rénové. Thomas and Guénon, as well as Desjobert, the medium, were “excommunicated” from Martinism in 1909 by Papus and Téder. All three were also Freemasons.»Dubois cierra el circuito entre la librería y el Ordre du Temple Rénové por Faugeron y Thomas, y data en 1909 la excomunión martinista de Thomas, Guénon y el médium Desjobert por Papus y Téder; entrecomilla la excomunión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«Pierre Dujols was passionate about alchemy and was very discreet. He left behind few traces to prove it, but it is said that he was keenly interested in this field.»Dubois declara aquí el límite de su propia documentación: la afición alquímica de Dujols deja pocas huellas y descansa en lo que se dice, no en pruebas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«In his book La Pierre Philosophale (The Philosopher’s Stone), in the chapter entitled “Quelques réflexions” (Some Thoughts), the engineer Georges Ranque provides information on Pierre Dujols and his connection with alchemy.»Dubois presenta al ingeniero Georges Ranque y su *La Pierre Philosophale* como fuente sobre el vínculo de Dujols con la alquimia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«Based on their writings, we would think that Magophon and Auriger were familiar with the practice of the work. For me, who knew them well, I can state that they were acquainted with the theory, but the mystery of Mercury and bringing it to life remained for them unsolved all their lives. One of the last authors who would have succeeded is Cyliani, whose treatise appeared in 1832.»Dubois transcribe el testimonio de Ranque, que niega a Magophon —seudónimo de Dujols— y a Auriger la práctica del arte y solo les concede la teoría, y que da a Cyliani por uno de los últimos que lo habrían logrado; Ranque apoya su juicio en el trato personal con ambos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«An article in Charivari entitled “l’Ère du Verseau” (The Age of Aquarius) provides an echo of this for us:c Not only do the adherents of Hiéron promote themselves as Templars and Knights of the Grail, but furthermore do they proclaim themselves as “Apostles of the Final Times,” those who were called for by the Virgin of la Salette.»Dubois transcribe un artículo de *Charivari* sobre la Era de Acuario que ataca a los adeptos del Hiéron por proclamarse templarios, caballeros del Grial y apóstoles de los últimos tiempos; la *c* volada es la llamada a nota del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«These lines were written in 1925 by a Parisian bookstore owner named Pierre Dujols—strange man, very scholarly, and according to some, passionate about esotericism and alchemy.»Dubois cierra la cita anterior con su atribución impresa —un librero parisino llamado Pierre Dujols, apasionado por el esoterismo y la alquimia *según algunos*—, y ese testimonio ajeno de 1925 es lo poco que documenta su afición.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«Concerning the name Cyliani, Eugène Canseliet agrees with attributing its authorship to Pierre Dujols. In Feu du Soleil (Fire of the Sun), he declares to Robert Amadou: “I add then Cyliani. What a pseudonym! It’s Pierre Dujols who gave him this name.”»Dubois recoge la coincidencia de Canseliet con Ranque en adjudicar a Dujols la paternidad del seudónimo Cyliani, y transcribe la declaración de Canseliet a Robert Amadou en *Feu du Soleil*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 28»

«The perceptive reader will note a contradiction: Hermès Dévoilé (Hermes Unveiled), the publication attributed to Cyliani, appeared in 1832. Upon republication of the book by Chacornac in 1915, Pierre Dujols, who was born in 1862, could well have filled out the Ci . . . that stood for the author’s name.»Dubois objeta esa adjudicación por la cronología: *Hermès Dévoilé* salió en 1832 y Dujols nació en 1862, de modo que solo en la reedición de Chacornac de 1915 pudo haber completado la firma trunca.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«Yet in 1834, two years after the appearance of Hermès Dévoilé, we find published in Paris the Nouveau Recueil d’Ouvrages Anonymes et Pseudonymes (New Collection of Anonymous and Pseudonymous Works) by a Mr. de Manne. On page 157, under work numbered 727, the pseudonym Cyliani appears for the first time.»Dubois aporta el documento que cierra la objeción: el *Nouveau Recueil d’Ouvrages Anonymes et Pseudonymes* de M. de Manne, París 1834, registra el seudónimo Cyliani en su página 157, entrada 727.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«Pierre Dujols, then, could have reused this name but he could not have originated it, for in 1834 he had not yet been born.»Dubois enuncia la conclusión con su límite dentro: Dujols pudo reutilizar el nombre, no inventarlo. Es el modelo de sus adjudicaciones —lo posible se separa de lo imposible y no se pasa de ahí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«Fortunately, he did leave us a single book written under the pseudonym Magophon, entitled Mutus Liber (The Mute Book),⁷ preceded by an hypotypose.»Dubois consigna el único libro que Dujols firmó como Magophon, el *Mutus Liber*, precedido de una hipotiposis.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«In it he develops very interesting ideas, which we shall find later in works attributed to Fulcanelli and which concern Kermes, celestial agriculture, the composition of an egg, the oak barrel, photography and salts, nostoc,e the reference to Thomas Corneille, and so on.»Dubois enumera los motivos de ese libro de Dujols que dice reencontrar en las obras atribuidas a Fulcanelli —el kermes, la agricultura celeste, la composición del huevo, la cuba de roble, la fotografía y las sales, el nostoc, la referencia a Thomas Corneille—: la coincidencia temática es su argumento de autoría, y lo presenta como tal.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«In his youth, Pierre Dujols accompanied his parents when they left the Cantal region and moved to Marseilles. This was how he came to be an attentive student of the Jesuits of Aix-en-Provence, where he received a classical education.»Dubois explica por dónde le vino a Dujols la formación clásica que sostiene su helenismo: el traslado familiar del Cantal a Marsella y los jesuitas de Aix-en-Provence.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«Having worked as a journalist in Marseilles and in Toulouse, he finally decided to live in Paris, at 47 rue Denfert-Rochereau (nowadays, rue Henri Barbusse).»Dubois traza el itinerario profesional de Dujols del periodismo en Marsella y Toulouse a París, con domicilio y con el nombre actual de la calle.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«In Paris he organized a salon and hosted dinner parties. His soirées were highly regarded»Dubois consigna el salón y las cenas de Dujols en París; el tramo se corta ahí porque la frase sigue con un compuesto partido por el salto de renglón —*far-reaching*— que quedaría cosido dentro de las comillas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«His brother Antoine, seventeen years his senior, had written a small pamphlet⁸ of fifty-eight pages that appeared in Marseilles in 1879 and gave rise to controversy in the local press»Dubois data en Marsella en 1879 el opúsculo de cincuenta y ocho páginas del hermano mayor, Antoine, y anota la polémica que levantó en la prensa local.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«In this work studded with Latin quotations, Antoine Dujols demonstrates the dynastic legitimacy of his family.»Dubois resume el objeto de ese opúsculo, la legitimidad dinástica de la familia, y describe su factura, cuajada de citas latinas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«He presents evidence to prove that the last member of the Valois line, the fourth son of Catherine de Medici and Henri II, did not die without leaving an heir.»Dubois expone el argumento de Antoine Dujols, que niega que el último Valois, cuarto hijo de Catalina de Médicis y Enrique II, muriera sin descendencia, y lo da como alegato de él, no como hecho.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«François de Valois, duke of Anjou and Alençon, married Jeanne Adélaïde, duchess of Médine Coeli, on April 12, 1575.»Dubois transcribe la pieza en que descansa ese alegato: el matrimonio de François de Valois con Jeanne Adélaïde, duquesa de Medinaceli, el 12 de abril de 1575.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«From this marriage there arose a long line of male children, the last representative of which is Antoine Dujols de Valois, brother of Pierre, postman at Saint-Chamas»Dubois cierra la genealogía en el propio Antoine Dujols de Valois, cartero de Saint-Chamas y hermano de Pierre: el contraste entre la pretensión dinástica y el oficio queda a la vista sin comentario.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 29»

«His death was recorded among the obituaries in the July 17, 1892, issue of the paper L’Avant-Garde de Provence, an establishment-oriented, Catholic literary weekly. It reads as follows:»Dubois localiza la esquela de Antoine Dujols en *L’Avant-Garde de Provence* del 17 de julio de 1892 y caracteriza al semanario como literario, católico y de orden.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 30»

«Mr. de Valois, whom we knew and respected, has just died, imbued with feelings of the most profound faith, in the town of Salon, after a long and painful illness. The tuberculosis patients to whom he had devoted a part of his life completely selflessly will have lost in him not only a friend but a healer. Having witnessed several recoveries, which we believed to be resurrections, our conscience impels us to state this fact publicly. We extend to his brother and his mother our most sincere condolences.»[esquela de *L’Avant-Garde de Provence*, 1892, transcrita por Dubois] el diario despide a Antoine de Valois como amigo y sanador de tuberculosos y declara haber presenciado curaciones que sus redactores tuvieron por resurrecciones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 30»

«So he was a thaumaturgist.»Dubois saca de esa esquela su propia conclusión en una línea, y la deja sin desarrollar: es de las pocas veces en que pasa del documento al juicio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 30»

«In addition to his book Valois contre Bourbons (The Conflict between the Valois and the Bourbons), he wrote a curious little pamphlet of twenty-six pages on the regeneration of grapevines. He published it himself under the name A. de Valois, and affixed his signature to the last page.»Dubois completa la bibliografía de Antoine Dujols con un opúsculo de veintiséis páginas sobre la regeneración de la vid, autoeditado y firmado A. de Valois.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«The family of Pierre Dujols tells anecdotally that his brother, Antoine, called on the Orléans family in Paris in order to show them important proofs in his possession concerning his genealogy, and that the family consented to see him.»Dubois marca como tradición familiar —*tells anecdotally*— la visita de Antoine a los Orléans en París para enseñarles las pruebas de su genealogía.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Later, in the town of Salon, where Antoine lived, burglars broke into the quarters he shared with his mother on the rue d’Avignon, attacked them both, and stole these documents as well as the ring that he owned.»Dubois cuenta el robo con agresión en la casa de Salon que se llevó esos documentos y un anillo, con lo que la prueba dinástica queda, en su relato, desaparecida.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«The Valois family line continued no further, for Antoine had no offspring and his brother, Pierre, had no sons and two daughters—Yvonne, born in 1888, and Marguerite, born in 1900.»Dubois cierra la línea en la generación siguiente: Antoine sin descendencia y Pierre con dos hijas, Yvonne e Marguerite.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Pierre’s wife, whose maiden name was Charton, was a woman of rare beauty who, despite her youth, had very long white hair. A native of Hennebont, in Brittany, she married Pierre Dujols in 1887 when she was only nineteen and he was twenty-five.»Dubois describe a la mujer de Pierre Dujols, de soltera Charton, nacida en Hennebont y casada con él en 1887.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Madame Dujols was gifted with a remarkable clairvoyance; she performed card readings and palmistry and very often had premonitory dreams.»Dubois atribuye a Madame Dujols una clarividencia notable con lectura de cartas, quiromancia y sueños premonitorios, y lo enuncia como cualidad, no como testimonio ajeno.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Regarding Hennebont, we should recall the story of the ring that Fulcanelli owned and which, according to Mr. Canseliet, originated with the abbé of a Cistercian monastery that in the twelfth century was a commandery of the Knights Templar of Hennebont.»Dubois enlaza el lugar de nacimiento de la mujer de Dujols con el anillo que Canseliet atribuye a Fulcanelli, procedente según él del abad de un monasterio cisterciense que fue encomienda templaria de Hennebont; la coincidencia de topónimo es el tipo de indicio con que arma su caso.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«The salon of the Dujols, in the 5th arrondissement of Paris, was frequented by those involved in the world of esotericism. Among them was the well-known Kabbalist, and old friend of Pierre Dujols, Paul Vulliaud, who had a considerable interest in the hermetic cabala.»Dubois pone en el salón de los Dujols al cabalista Paul Vulliaud, viejo amigo de la casa e interesado en la cábala hermética, que es justo el procedimiento de Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Oswald Wirth as well as René Guénon also attended regularly and participated in the exchange of ideas.»Dubois añade a Oswald Wirth y a Guénon entre los asiduos del mismo salón.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«We should recall that in 1905, René Guénon, along with a few young people from Martinism (Thomas and Faugeron among them), created the famous Ordre du Temple Rénové.»Dubois data aquí en 1905 la creación del Ordre du Temple Rénové por Guénon con Thomas y Faugeron; en la plana 16 había situado el mandato mediúmnico en 1908 y en la 17 el ritual el 23 de febrero de ese año. Las dos fechas quedan como las imprime el libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«The woman who was the concierge at 47 rue Denfert-Rochereau reported later that Pierre Dujols himself directed the rituals of the order.»Dubois apoya en el testimonio de la portera del edificio la dirección de los rituales de la orden por el propio Dujols: es la pieza que pondría a Dujols en el centro del grupo de Guénon.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«The husband of the concierge also participated in the séances. He was a close friend of Dujols and, oddly, passed away one day after he did.»Dubois añade que el marido de la portera asistía a las sesiones y murió un día después que Dujols, y llama rara la coincidencia sin sacarle consecuencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«The Ordre du Temple Rénové was disbanded in 1911. This was also the year that Pierre Dujols fell seriously ill with the osteoarthritis from which he died on April 19, 1926, at the age of sixty-four.»Dubois hace coincidir la disolución de la orden en 1911 con el comienzo de la artrosis de Dujols, y data su muerte el 19 de abril de 1926 a los sesenta y cuatro años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«It was difficult for him to move around, and in 1921, five years before his death, he became bedridden.»Dubois data en 1921 la postración de Dujols, cinco años antes de su muerte: el dato es importante para su tesis, porque acota lo que Dujols pudo hacer en los años de gestación de los dos libros.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Eugène Canseliet saw him in this state, “lying on his sickbed with his folded knees serving as his desk.”»Dubois cita a Canseliet como testigo directo de esa postración, con la imagen de las rodillas dobladas por escritorio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«He nevertheless continued to study alchemy, and in 1914 he published Mutus Liber with an hypotypose.»Dubois data en 1914 la publicación del *Mutus Liber* con hipotiposis, pese a la enfermedad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«This same year his associate Thomas was killed in the war. This was also a loss for Jean-Julien Champagne, who was Thomas’s faithful friend.»Dubois data en 1914 la muerte en la guerra de Alexandre Thomas, socio de Dujols, y la registra también como pérdida para Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Pierre Dujols was very connected to esoteric circles. A letter that he wrote to Papus, addressed “Dear Master,” conveys the esteem with which he regarded Dr. Encausse»Dubois apoya en una carta de Dujols a Papus, encabezada *Dear Master*, la estima con que trataba a Gérard Encausse; el tramo se corta antes de la llamada a la figura.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«This missive is undated but must nevertheless have been written between 1912, the date of the closing of the Librairie du Merveilleux, and 1915–16, for Papus died in 1916.»Dubois data esa carta sin fecha por horquilla, entre el cierre de la librería en 1912 y la muerte de Papus en 1916, y muestra el procedimiento con que fecha los documentos del caso.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 32»

«Although Dujols’s associates included many who were involved in Freemasonry, nowhere have we found evidence of his belonging to this movement, nor, furthermore, to Martinism.»Dubois consigna una negativa como hallazgo: pese al entorno masónico de Dujols, no encontró prueba de que perteneciera ni a la masonería ni al martinismo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 33»

«But the striking involvement in his life of personalities from these two movements no doubt allowed him to have heard of, or even to have known, the scholarly philologist and archaeologist Grasset d’Orcet.»Dubois deriva de ese mismo entorno la posibilidad —con su límite: *no doubt allowed him to have heard of, or even to have known*— de que Dujols conociera al filólogo y arqueólogo Grasset d’Orcet.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 33»

«Dujols, who died in 1926, and d’Orcet, who died in 1900, could have visited each other or even written to each other, maintaining a correspondence much like that of Engineering Commander Levet⁹ and Grasset d’Orcet.»Dubois enuncia en potencial —*could have*— el trato entre Dujols y d’Orcet y lo modela sobre la correspondencia documentada entre el comandante Levet y d’Orcet.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 33»

«Both Levet and d’Orcet were fascinated by cryptography and exchanged more than three hundred letters.»Dubois cifra en más de trescientas las cartas cruzadas entre Levet y d’Orcet, unidos por la criptografía, que es la disciplina vecina de la cábala fonética de los libros firmados.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 33»

«Papus, an acquaintance of Pierre Dujols’s, received a letter from Commander Levet, a Freemason of the Grand Orient Lodge, that seems to prove the connection among these different individuals»Dubois presenta una carta del comandante Levet a Papus, masón del Gran Oriente, y mide su alcance con reserva: *seems to prove* la conexión entre estas personas, no la prueba.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 33»

«Furthermore, in 1911 a translation of the English The Mystical Traditions by the theosophist Isabel Cooper-Oakley, which quotes Grasset d’Orcet, appeared in Paris under the title Traditions mystiques.»Dubois data en 1911 la traducción parisina de *The Mystical Traditions* de la teósofa Isabel Cooper-Oakley y anota que cita a Grasset d’Orcet, con lo que sitúa a d’Orcet en circulación dentro del medio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 33»

«Grasset d’Orcet was born at Aurillac in the Cantal region not far from Saint-Illide, home territory of the Dujols de Valois family and birthplace of Pierre Dujols.»Dubois hace valer la vecindad geográfica: d’Orcet nació en Aurillac, cerca de Saint-Illide, cuna de Dujols. El indicio es de proximidad, no de trato, y así queda enunciado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«Along with others, he believed in strange reading techniques, which he had discovered in two stages. Applicable to texts as important as those of Rabelais, these techniques allowed readers to discover that underlying an apparently commonplace text is a second layer of meaning transmitting a teaching or providing political revelations.»Dubois describe el método de lectura de d’Orcet, aplicable a Rabelais, que busca bajo el texto llano una segunda capa de sentido con enseñanza o revelación política; escribe *believed in*, con lo que consigna la creencia sin suscribirla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«His work appeared in the Revue Britannique, a journal published between 1825 and 1901 and founded by Louis-Sébastien Saulnier with the aim of promulgating literary and scientific news from England.»Dubois sitúa la obra de d’Orcet en la *Revue Britannique*, con sus fechas y su fundador.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«Fulcanelli quotes Grasset d’Orcet in Le Mystère des Cathédrales, in the chapter on the Cyclic Cross of Hendaye concerning Grasset d’Orcet’s analysis of the Songe de Poliphile,¹⁰ which first appeared in an article in the Revue.»Dubois localiza una cita de d’Orcet dentro de *Le Mystère des Cathédrales*, en el capítulo de la cruz cíclica de Hendaya, sobre el *Songe de Poliphile*: la dependencia textual es su argumento.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«Applying cryptographic keys to this work, Grasset d’Orcet claims that “[t]he Dream of Poliphilus is none other than a Masonic grimoire—that is, an encoded text applied to architecture, no different from more modern treatises of this kind except for the incomparable richness and nobility of its structures.”»Dubois transcribe la tesis de d’Orcet sobre el *Sueño de Polifilo* como grimorio masónico aplicado a la arquitectura, y la da como reclamación suya —*claims*—; el corchete de la minúscula inicial es del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«Grasset d’Orcet demonstrated an amazing erudition and a nearly exclusive interest in the Greek language.»Dubois señala en d’Orcet el mismo helenismo casi exclusivo que atribuye a Dujols, con lo que los aproxima por el método además de por la geografía.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«Another personality aroused the curiosity of the little group forming around the Dujols family. Fulcanelli speaks of this in his book Les Demeures Philosophales, at the beginning of the chapter on the hermetic cabala.»Dubois abre el caso Allévy señalando que quien habla de él es el propio Fulcanelli, al principio del capítulo de la cábala hermética de *Les Demeures Philosophales*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«In the year 1843, those conscripts assigned to the 46th Infantry Regiment garrisoned at Parisk could meet each week with a very uncommon professor by proceeding across the courtyard of the Louis-Philippe barracks. . . . In the evening he taught the history of France to the soldiers who wanted to attend, requiring a modest fee and using a method that he claimed had been known in the most remote antiquity.»[Fulcanelli, *Les Demeures Philosophales*, transcrito por Dubois] el pasaje sitúa en 1843 al profesor que enseñaba historia de Francia a los soldados del cuartel Louis-Philippe por un método que decía antiquísimo; la *k* pegada a *Paris* es la llamada a nota del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 35»

«was so attractive for those who attended was based on traditional phonetic cabala.»[Fulcanelli, *Les Demeures Philosophales*, transcrito por Dubois] el pasaje identifica el fundamento del curso de aquel profesor con la cábala fonética tradicional; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana y empieza en la 35 con *In reality, this course that*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«This unique professor described by Fulcanelli—Allévy, the only teacher of this method —is the author of a little pamphlet, L’Histoire de France, Allévysée.»Dubois pone nombre y libro al profesor anónimo del pasaje de Fulcanelli: Allévy y su opúsculo autoeditado. Identificar la fuente impresa de un pasaje es su procedimiento típico de argumentación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«The examples chosen by the alchemist can be found in this book, with minor variations.»Dubois señala que los ejemplos que da Fulcanelli están en el opúsculo de Allévy con variantes menores, lo que sitúa al autor de *Les Demeures* leyendo ese folleto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«The mnemonic technique employed by this method and elaborated on by the congenial Allévy is based on rebus and wordplay»Dubois describe el método de Allévy como mnemotecnia de jeroglífico y juego de palabras, con lo que rebaja la cábala fonética a procedimiento nemotécnico de aula.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«According to letters of recommendation and the congratulations that were addressed to him by the colonels (see fig. 4.15), it seems clear that his method was appreciated and that it gave excellent results.»Dubois apoya en cartas de recomendación de los coroneles la eficacia del método, y conserva el grado: *it seems clear*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«Fulcanelli has Clovis ascending the throne in 466; Allévy, who is right, in 481.»Dubois enmienda a Fulcanelli en la fecha de acceso de Clodoveo al trono y da la razón a Allévy: el error de copia es, en su argumento, la huella de la dependencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«Allévy was also the inventor of a perpetual dial mechanism (bought by King Léopold) showing days of the week and working for all calendar years between 1600 and 3099, as well as an “Allévy conjugator,” which reduced all French verbs to a single conjugation.»Dubois completa el retrato de Allévy con sus dos inventos, el mecanismo perpetuo de fechas comprado por el rey Leopoldo y el conjugador que reducía los verbos franceses a una sola conjugación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 36»

«Pierre Dujols was a lover of music, which he had studied with the Jesuits at Aix-en-Provence. He was a chorister and had even written a book on music.»Dubois añade al retrato de Dujols la música aprendida con los jesuitas de Aix, su condición de corista y un libro suyo sobre la materia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 37»

«The famous singer Emma Calvé was very much in evidence at the salon and in the home of Mr. and Mrs. Dujols. She had a strong interest in esoteric science and was a regular at the bookstore of Edmond Bailly, L’Art Indépendant, where she met Debussy, Satie, and many others.»Dubois sitúa a Emma Calvé en el salón de los Dujols y en la librería de Bailly, y cumple así la promesa de la plana 14 de enlazar su nombre con el caso.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 37»

«Born on August 15, 1858, at Decazeville, she was taken on by the Théâtre de la Monnaie, in Brussels, which proved to be the beginning of a splendid career.»Dubois data el nacimiento de Emma Calvé el 15 de agosto de 1858 en Decazeville y sitúa el arranque de su carrera en el Théâtre de la Monnaie de Bruselas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 37»

«Her real name was Calvet, but her teacher Puget advised her to remove the t from her name for»Dubois explica el nombre artístico por consejo de su maestro Puget, que le hizo quitar la t de Calvet; el tramo se corta porque el cambio de plana parte la frase, que sigue con *her life in the theater*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 37»

«her life in the theater. Contrary to what many authors have claimed, the lyric singer was not related to the clairvoyant from la Salette, Mélanie Calvat, whose name was really Calvat dit Mathieu.»Dubois niega el parentesco entre la cantante y la vidente de la Salette Mélanie Calvat, que muchos autores dan por hecho, y lo funda en el apellido real de esta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«Her lover was the famous Jules Bois, who was very involved in magic, and their relationship was well known.»Dubois consigna la relación notoria de Emma Calvé con Jules Bois, muy metido en la magia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«Bois, who was a handsome man from Marseilles, had been initiated into Lodge Number 7, AHATOR, of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.»Dubois adscribe a Jules Bois a la logia número 7, AHATOR, de la Golden Dawn.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«He wrote Petites Religions de Paris (Small Religions of Paris) in 1894, Satanisme et la Magie (Satanism and Magic) in 1895, and Le Monde invisible (The Invisible World) in 1902.»Dubois data los tres libros de Jules Bois entre 1894 y 1902.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«He was also editor of the journal Étoile, produced by the bookstore L’Art Indépendant, where he no doubt met Emma Calvé.»Dubois hace de la revista *Étoile* y de la librería L’Art Indépendant el lugar probable del encuentro de Bois con Emma Calvé, y conserva la reserva —*no doubt*— en vez de afirmarlo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«For her part, she bought a building called Cabrières, a small fortress that could have housed the mysterious kabbalistic work owned by Nicolas Flamel¹¹—the book of Abraham known by the name Aschmezareph.»Dubois enuncia en potencial —*could have housed*— que la fortaleza de Cabrières comprada por Emma Calvé albergara el libro de Abraham de Nicolas Flamel, llamado Aschmezareph.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«This title was part of a larger work, the second segment of which was entitled La Sagesse Divine (Divine Wisdom). It was owned, it seems, by Stanislas de Guaita.»Dubois describe ese título como parte de una obra mayor cuya segunda sección sería *La Sagesse Divine*, y atribuye su posesión a Guaita con reserva expresa: *it seems*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«The name Emma Calvé is also known to us through her connection with Abbé Saunière, whose fame relates to the strange affair of Rennes-le-Château.»Dubois enlaza a Emma Calvé con el abate Saunière y con el asunto de Rennes-le-Château.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«This abbé, who was at least a little peculiar, had apparently discovered documents in the crypt of his church and had come to Paris in the hope of finding a knowledgable person who could help decipher them—whom he did meet at the church of Saint-Sulpice.»Dubois resume el relato de Saunière conservando el grado —*apparently*— sobre los documentos hallados en la cripta, y afirma sin reserva el encuentro en Saint-Sulpice.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«Upon his return, in his own parish, he discovered (completely unexpectedly) a treasure trove as well as documents that proved the survival of a Merovingian family line.»Dubois consigna el segundo hallazgo del relato de Rennes-le-Château, el tesoro y los papeles sobre la supervivencia de una línea merovingia, en indirecto libre y sin apoyarlo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«There exists extensive literature as well as a television film on this topic.»Dubois se abstiene de entrar en el asunto de Rennes-le-Château y lo despacha remitiendo a su literatura y a una película de televisión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«Abbé Saunière’s associate Abbé Boudet, curé at Rennes-les-Bains, a village near his own, was an even more enigmatic figure.»Dubois pasa al abate Boudet, cura de Rennes-les-Bains, a quien tiene por figura aún más enigmática que Saunière.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«Abbé Boudet produced a work entitled La Véritable Langue Celtique (The Real Celtic Language)l—very scholarly and full of strange things—that would have been not at all uninteresting to our friends at the Librairie du Merveilleux.»Dubois enlaza *La Véritable Langue Celtique* de Boudet con la gente de la Librairie du Merveilleux por el interés compartido, y no por trato documentado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«In it he shows by means of the phonetic cabala that the single language that was spoken before Babel was modern English preserved by the Tectosages.m Thus he gave a very instructive explanation of Genesis.»Dubois expone la tesis de Boudet: que la lengua única anterior a Babel era el inglés moderno conservado por los tectosagos, argumentada por cábala fonética. La ironía de *very instructive* es de ella; la *m* volada es la llamada a nota.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«Moses worked in the fields and had been adopted by Pharaoh’s daughter and thus delivered from his labors. This contradicts the official version, which holds that Moses was found in a basket floating on the water.»Dubois cierra el ejemplo de Boudet, que descompone el nombre de Moisés en dos verbos ingleses, y anota que el resultado objeta el relato oficial de la cesta en el agua: sirve para mostrar hasta dónde llegaba el método que compartían Boudet, Allévy, d’Orcet, Dujols y los libros firmados Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 38»

«In 1910, the young René Schwaller, then twenty-three, arrived in Paris. In the years prior to the war, he studied painting with Matisse and, very attracted to metaphysics, made contact with the Theosophical Society, which was then at its height. This association brought him into contact with numerous occultists and ardent spiritualists.»Dubois data en 1910 la llegada de René Schwaller a París a los veintitrés años, con la pintura aprendida de Matisse y el contacto con la Sociedad Teosófica como puerta al medio ocultista.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«He was also a regular at the Librairie du Merveilleux, where he was immediately fascinated by this group’s interest in the phonetic cabala.»Dubois pone a Schwaller de asiduo en la librería de Dujols y atribuye a ese grupo el interés por la cábala fonética que lo cautivó: el eslabón que enlaza a Schwaller con Dujols es el local.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«As an artist, he also frequented the home of Edmond Bailly, owner of L’Art Indépendant bookstore on the rue de la Chaussée-d’Antin, where a theatrical and artistic crowd regularly gathered.»Dubois añade la librería de Bailly entre los sitios de Schwaller; aquí la calle sale con guion —*Chaussée-d’Antin*—, frente a la grafía sin guion de la plana 15.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«It is this bookstore owned by Bailly that also published his first book, a study of numbers, a subject that fascinated him.»Dubois atribuye a la casa de Bailly el primer libro de Schwaller, un estudio sobre los números.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«One day in 1913, a meeting took place there that would be significant for the circle of Jean-Julien Champagne and for the reemergence of alchemy as we now know it.»Dubois anuncia el encuentro de 1913 en la Closerie-des-Lilas como el momento decisivo de todo su relato, antes de contarlo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«From 1907 on, he was connected to the de Lesseps family, who lived in a superb mansion on the avenue Montaigne in Paris. He gained entry to this wealthy milieu through the family chauffeur.»Dubois data en 1907 la entrada de Champagne en la casa de Lesseps y anota por dónde: el chofer de la familia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«The sons of Ferdinand-Marie de Lesseps,a especially Bertrand and Ferdinand-Jules, were interested in, and in fact fascinated by, the science of Hermes.»Dubois atribuye a los hijos de Ferdinand de Lesseps, Bertrand y Ferdinand-Jules, la afición hermética que sostuvo económicamente a Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«They suggested that Jean-Julien Champagne take up residence in the laboratory that Ferdinand owned on the rue Vernier, in the 17th arrondissement. It consisted of a two-room suite with a view of Mont Valérien.»Dubois localiza el laboratorio de la rue Vernier que los Lesseps pusieron a disposición de Champagne, con su descripción material.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«Champagne moved in and was therefore able to work on the development of the Great Work. He had as a disciple a man named Max Roset, and his material existence was ensured by the de Lesseps family, who employed him as an industrial designer.»Dubois consigna el mecenazgo que permitió a Champagne trabajar en la Gran Obra, empleado como dibujante industrial, y le da un discípulo, Max Roset.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«It is in these quarters that Champagne engaged in the design of a propeller that later became the propulsion device on a polar sled he invented»Dubois atribuye a Champagne el diseño de una hélice que acabó siendo el propulsor de un trineo polar de su invención.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«He proceeded to carry out trials of the device with Raymond Roussel, his novelist friend.»Dubois pone al novelista Raymond Roussel en las pruebas del propulsor de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«In his book Deux Logis Alchimiques (Two Alchemical Abodes),² Champagne’s disciple Eugène Canseliet published a photograph of this fabulous propeller sled that was so ahead of its time.»Dubois apoya el episodio del trineo en una fotografía que Canseliet publicó en *Deux Logis Alchimiques*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«It was also on this street, the rue Vernier, at number 5, that the famous abbé Julio established his chapel. Robert Ambelain records this fact in his book L’Abbé Julio.»Dubois añade que el abate Julio tenía su capilla en la misma calle y atribuye el dato al libro de Robert Ambelain: otra vecindad puesta a valer como indicio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«In 1911, Bernard de Lesseps ultimately proposed that Jean-Julien Champagne come to live in a spare corner of the de Lesseps mansion on the avenue Montaigne and committed to a monthly stipend of five hundred francs for Champagne’s work on the polar sled.»Dubois data en 1911 el traslado de Champagne a la casa de los Lesseps de la avenue Montaigne, con estipendio mensual de quinientos francos por el trineo polar.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 40»

«With the death of Félix Gaboriaub in that same year, Champagne lost the man who initiated him into alchemy.»Dubois nombra a Félix Gaboriau iniciador de Champagne en la alquimia y data su muerte en ese mismo año; la *b* pegada al apellido es la llamada a nota.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 41»

«Our painter Champagne frequented two worlds that existed side by side and intermingled.»Dubois describe la doble pertenencia de Champagne, al mundo literario y al alquímico, como dos mundos contiguos y entreverados.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 41»

«In the world of literature, for example, Anatole France, who was often invited to the de Lesseps home, was also interested in occultism and, particularly, in spiritualism. He even participated in a few séances, which left him with some rather unpleasant memories.»Dubois pone a Anatole France de ejemplo de esa mezcla, invitado de los Lesseps e interesado en el espiritismo, con recuerdos desagradables de las sesiones a que asistió.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 41»

«All these people were involved in alchemy—a fashionable pursuit of those times. Courses in hermetic science were offered by a wide range of groups.»Dubois califica la alquimia de afición de moda en esa sociedad y anota la oferta amplia de cursos de ciencia hermética.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 41»

«The brothers Chacornac, friends of Dujols, also employed Champagne in their bookstore on the riverbank in Paris. His work involved receiving books coming in from private libraries, generally from the provinces, evaluating them, and shelving them.»Dubois documenta el otro empleo de Champagne, en la librería de los hermanos Chacornac, recibiendo y tasando bibliotecas privadas de provincias: ese oficio es el que pondrá en sus manos el manuscrito de la plana 43.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 41»

«This was hardly an unpleasant task, for he was always on the lookout for old books dealing with alchemy.»Dubois anota que el trabajo convenía a Champagne porque le dejaba buscar libros viejos de alquimia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 41»

«Now it happened that one day, when he was busy classifying books, a rare copy of one of Newton’s writings fell into his hands.⁴ Upon opening it, he discovered a six-page manuscript from 1830 that consisted of notes taken by a researcher in the course of his experiments and articulating his success.»Dubois cuenta el hallazgo que pone en marcha el episodio: dentro de un ejemplar raro de Newton, un manuscrito de seis páginas de 1830 con notas de experimentos y su resultado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«Champagne stole these precious leaves and took them home to study them further.»Dubois consigna sin atenuantes que Champagne robó esas hojas, y ese es el primer eslabón de la serie de apropiaciones que le atribuirá el capítulo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«Already exulting in the idea of being able to obtain a similar result for himself, he discovered to his great joy that the document spoke of alchemical manipulations leading to the famous blue and red colors that were used in the stained-glass windows of Chartres Cathedral.»Dubois identifica el contenido del manuscrito con las manipulaciones que dan los azules y rojos de las vidrieras de Chartres: ese es el problema técnico que va a ocupar a Champagne y a Schwaller durante años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«From then on he delved into the manuscript and tried to decipher it, spending many hours in the laboratory, but with no success.»Dubois consigna el fracaso de Champagne al intentar descifrarlo solo, que es lo que explica el paso siguiente.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«Then one day in 1913, while he was at the Closerie-des-Lilas, as was his custom, he noticed René Schwaller, who, he knew, had a great interest in alchemy and a strong knowledge of chemistry. Champagne approached him and proposed a reading of the manuscript he had discovered, with a view to possible collaboration.»Dubois narra el encuentro de 1913 anunciado en la plana 40: Champagne aborda a Schwaller por su química y le propone leer juntos el manuscrito.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«Self-interest guided him—if he had been able to resolve the problem himself, he undoubtedly never would have shown these pages to the future Egyptologist.»Dubois adjudica un móvil interesado a esa propuesta y lo dice con su límite: de haber podido resolverlo solo, *undoubtedly* no habría enseñado las hojas a nadie.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«Schwaller was immediately interested. Besides alchemy, René Schwaller displayed a great curiosity for theories on the composition of matter.»Dubois amplía el interés de Schwaller de la alquimia a las teorías sobre la composición de la materia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«In fact, he disapproved totally of the work on the atom, which, he was to say later, presented great dangers for humanity. This was a position he maintained all his life, and the facts have not proved him wrong.»Dubois consigna el rechazo de Schwaller a la investigación atómica por peligrosa para la humanidad y le da la razón por su cuenta, en una de las pocas tomas de partido explícitas del libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 43»

«cathedrals in particular. During his stay in Paris, he often went to Notre Dame Cathedral in order to observe its architecture and sculptures. In this way, he studied the symbolism of the cathedrals and their relationship to the art of alchemy.»Dubois documenta el interés previo de Schwaller por las catedrales y su simbolismo alquímico, con sus visitas a Notre-Dame; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana y empieza en la 43 con *Schwaller’s work with numbers led him to study architectural forms and the*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«In fact, he had drafted a manuscript on this topic. That is why the few pages that Champagne showed him stirred him so strongly.»Dubois consigna que Schwaller ya tenía redactado un manuscrito sobre esa materia, lo que explica su reacción ante las hojas de Champagne: ese manuscrito es la pieza sobre la que descansará después toda la disputa de autoría.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«The two men negotiated a contract: Schwaller would contribute a monthly payment to the painter that would allow him to support himself and, in return, Champagne was to work on the operational aspects—Schwaller would clarify the theory and Champagne, an excellent technician in the laboratory, would carry out the experiments.»Dubois describe el reparto de trabajo pactado entre ambos —Schwaller pone la teoría y el dinero, Champagne la mano de laboratorio—, que es el núcleo de su hipótesis sobre cómo se hicieron los libros firmados.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«Fig. 5.4. The dedication from Pierre Dujols to Fulcanelli. Translation: “To my old and faithful friend, the Philosopher-Adept: Open to the ingenious, / And closed to fools, / I offer you this reading /. For our elucidation. Magophon—Pierre Dujols, March 18, 1920”»[pie de lámina] la fig. 5.4 reproduce una dedicatoria firmada Magophon el 18 de marzo de 1920 y dirigida a un *Philosopher-Adept*; el pie la rotula como dedicatoria de Dujols a Fulcanelli, con lo que el propio documento se presenta como pieza de la adjudicación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«In the contract, one condition was stipulated: Whatever happened, whether they succeeded or failed, neither was to reveal the existence of this contract, and upon its expiration, the two would go their separate ways without ever mentioning the subject again.»Dubois destaca la cláusula de silencio del contrato, que obligaba a callar su existencia pasara lo que pasara y a separarse sin volver sobre el asunto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«The nonobservance of this pact was to have fatal consequences for Champagne. At least, that is how Schwaller later explained the ultimate decline of his partner.»Dubois adjudica al incumplimiento de ese pacto la ruina de Champagne y acto seguido devuelve la explicación a quien la dio: *that is how Schwaller later explained*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«Jean-Julien Champagne thus carried out his experiments while the upheaval of war battered France. Schwaller was mobilized to work in a military laboratory carrying out nutrition analyses; nevertheless, he continued to pursue his experiments with the alchemist.»Dubois sitúa el trabajo de ambos durante la guerra, con Schwaller movilizado a un laboratorio militar de análisis de alimentos y sin dejar los experimentos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«He recognized Champagne as a master, both for his erudition in alchemical symbolism and for his extraordinary mastery of the operational aspects of the science.»Dubois consigna que Schwaller tenía a Champagne por maestro tanto en el simbolismo alquímico como en la práctica: el reconocimiento viene del socio, no de ella.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«At the same time, Champagne continued to work at the home of the de Lesseps family, and in July 1914 the first trials of his propeller were successfully conducted.»Dubois data en julio de 1914 las primeras pruebas logradas del propulsor de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«It was quite a happy crowd that then gathered at the avenue Montaigne. Among them were certain symbolist poets such as André Breton, who was later connected with Eugène Canseliet.»Dubois pone a poetas simbolistas en la casa de los Lesseps y nombra a André Breton, después relacionado con Canseliet.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 44»

«Schwaller later told André VandenBroeck about the obsession that emanated from this group: to try and explain everything using the Greek language.»Dubois transmite por André VandenBroeck el juicio de Schwaller sobre el grupo de la librería: la obsesión de explicarlo todo por el griego.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Schwaller found this approach obsolete and not corresponding to our times. For him, the only cabala that was possible and contemporary was that based on Egyptian hieroglyphics.»Dubois consigna la objeción de Schwaller a la cábala helenizante de Dujols y su propuesta alternativa, la cábala por jeroglíficos egipcios: el desacuerdo queda como dato y no se arbitra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«In 1915, Eugène Canseliet was introduced to Champagne. He was sixteen years old; the painter was thirty-eight. Dujols was fifty-three and Schwaller twenty-eight.»Dubois data en 1915 el encuentro de Canseliet con Champagne y alinea las cuatro edades del grupo en ese momento, con Canseliet de dieciséis años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Eugène Canseliet did not hesitate to become the attentive student of this master whom he admired so much and whom he served all his life. In the first years, he acted as an assistant for Champagne’s courses.»Dubois describe la relación de Canseliet con Champagne como discipulado admirativo de por vida, con ayudantía en sus cursos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Canseliet actually became the pivot in manipulations of which he remained quite unaware—a kind of hoax that would take a turn its perpetrators did not perhaps foresee.»Dubois adjudica a Canseliet el papel de eje involuntario de un engaño cuyos autores, dice, tal vez no previeron el giro que tomaría: exculpa al discípulo y carga el dolo sobre los otros, con la reserva *perhaps*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«In fact, thanks to Champagne, Eugène Canseliet entered the worldly and occultist high society of Paris. He was often at the de Lesseps home, at the symbolist group with André Breton, and among the little circle of Pierre Dujols, which he came to know only slightly.»Dubois anota que Canseliet entró en el medio parisino de la mano de Champagne y precisa el límite de su trato con el círculo de Dujols: solo de refilón.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«He did, however, forge a strong friendship with Paul Le Cour, founder of the Atlantis movement, and he refined his alchemical education, both operational and symbolic, at the feet of his master, Champagne.»Dubois enlaza a Canseliet con Paul Le Cour, fundador del movimiento Atlantis —el mismo que el prólogo de Gallois cita en la plana 7— y sitúa toda su formación alquímica en Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«If Canseliet was of prime importance in the distribution of the work of Fulcanelli, he was similarly key to the tenacious spreading of the legend.»Dubois distingue dos papeles de Canseliet y los pone al mismo nivel: la difusión de la obra y la propagación tenaz de la leyenda.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«He was often seen in libraries, where, using his beautiful handwriting, he honed his skills in reproducing the calligraphy of ancient manuscripts.»Dubois consigna la destreza de Canseliet imitando la caligrafía de manuscritos antiguos, dato que su relato dejará sin desarrollar aquí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Canseliet also often accompanied Champagne to the home of his mother at Arnouville-les-Gonesses, the avenue Viollet-le-Duc, where she was living at the time. There they painted a number of canvases, including a portrait of Champagne on August 12, 1921, by Canseliet, who reproduced it in his book L’Alchimie expliquée sur ses textes classiques (Alchemy as Explained by Its Classic Texts).»Dubois data el 12 de agosto de 1921 un retrato de Champagne pintado por Canseliet en casa de la madre de este, y anota que el propio Canseliet lo reprodujo en su *Alchimie expliquée sur ses textes classiques*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Irène Hillel-Erlanger, a young woman who was a friend of Louis Aragon and the daughter of a rich banker, was known to have an evening drink with the Surrealists at the café on the place Blanche in Paris.»Dubois presenta a Irène Hillel-Erlanger, hija de banquero y amiga de Aragon, entre los surrealistas de la place Blanche.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«She also often went to the home of the de Lessepses on the avenue Montaigne. She was born June 30, 1878, and died in Paris on March 21, 1920.»Dubois la sitúa también en casa de los Lesseps y da sus fechas, con la muerte en París el 21 de marzo de 1920.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«One of her ancestors, Abraham de Camondo, who died in 1873, had been the banker for the sultan of Constantinople.»Dubois anota entre sus antepasados a Abraham de Camondo, banquero del sultán de Constantinopla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«An occasional poet writing under the pseudonym Claude Lorrey, she left her mark for posterity with a book: In 1919, in Paris, Georges Crès published her Voyages en Kaléidoscope, a little pamphlet whose significance depended neither on its style nor on its storyline—which was rather ordinary—but rather on the alchemical underpinnings that shone through its text.»Dubois data en 1919 los *Voyages en Kaléidoscope* que Hillel-Erlanger firmó Claude Lorrey, y sitúa su interés no en el estilo ni en la trama sino en el fondo alquímico que transparenta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Jean-Julien Champagne ascribed a great deal of importance to this document, in which, it seems, the Great Work is revealed.»Dubois consigna el valor que Champagne daba a ese libro y conserva la reserva sobre su contenido: *it seems* que revela la Gran Obra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Doubtless he was no stranger to Irène. His influence with the de Lessepses in questions of alchemy was significant, and Irène was a familiar figure there.»Dubois enuncia con reserva —*Doubtless*— el trato entre Champagne e Hillel-Erlanger, y lo funda solo en la casa que ambos frecuentaban.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«She was also a friend of Louise Barbe, to whom she dedicated her little book: “To the great soul of L. B., piously I offer these pages. I. H. E.”»Dubois transcribe la dedicatoria del libro de Hillel-Erlanger a Louise Barbe, con sus iniciales.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«Louise was the first wife of Dr. Voronoff, who, according to Robert Ambelain, Champagne masterfully hoodwinked, for our painter was a prankster and a bon vivant.»Dubois enlaza a Louise Barbe con el doctor Voronoff y atribuye a Robert Ambelain el relato del engaño de Champagne, a quien retrata de bromista.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 45»

«He convinced Serge Voronofff that he possessed the Chrysopoeia, and to support his claim he showed Voronoff his identity card indicating that he was of a venerable age in relation to his astonishingly young physical appearance.»Dubois describe la treta de Champagne con Voronoff: hacerse pasar por poseedor de la Crisopeya exhibiendo una cédula de identidad que le daba una edad muy superior a su aspecto. Es el mecanismo mismo de la leyenda del adepto rejuvenecido, aquí en su versión doméstica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«In fact, it was his father’s card, which he had pinched, for he was extremely crafty.»Dubois deshace la treta: la cédula era la del padre de Champagne, sustraída por él.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«In 1921, Jean-Julien Champagne was invited to work on the drawings for a refrigeration plan at the Château de Léré, in the Berry region.»Dubois data en 1921 el encargo de dibujos para una instalación frigorífica en el castillo de Léré, de Pierre de Lesseps.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«Champagne also taught drawing and, at his convenience, continued to use the laboratory that was made available to him in order to go on with his alchemical experiments.»Dubois consigna que Champagne daba clases de dibujo y tenía laboratorio a su disposición para seguir con sus experimentos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«But he stayed just a short time in the Berry region, and in 1922 he returned to Paris, where he met Jules Boucher (J. B.), who became another of his disciples.»Dubois data en 1922 el regreso de Champagne a París y su encuentro con Jules Boucher, que se le agrega como discípulo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«It was in this same year, 1922, during the month of September, that Eugène Canseliet, twenty-five years old, was present at the famous transmutation.»Dubois data en septiembre de 1922 la transmutación célebre en que estuvo Canseliet, entonces de veinticinco años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«He carried out the projectionh himself, under Fulcanelli’s direction.»Dubois consigna que la proyección la hizo Canseliet por su mano y bajo dirección de Fulcanelli; la *h* volada es la llamada a nota.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«The scene took place in the small apartment that he occupied in the gas factory at Sarcelles in the presence of Jean-Julien Champagne and the chemist Gaston Sauvage.»Dubois localiza la escena en la fábrica de gas de Sarcelles, con Champagne y el químico Gaston Sauvage presentes: los mismos nombres del Grand Lunaire de la plana 20.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«This transmutation was not the result of the success of the Great Work, but rather a single specific instance. Eugène Canseliet admitted it himself to the dearly departed Savoret.»Dubois acota el alcance de esa transmutación —caso aislado y no culminación de la Gran Obra— y funda la acotación en lo que el propio Canseliet le admitió a Savoret.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 46»

«Champagne’s own bookplate showed a green circle with a retort. It is possible that the curious dedication addressed to Aor (René Schwaller de Lubicz) by a soldier who had taken the initiatory name Parsifal (see fig. 5.6) refers to this experiment, although the dates differ: September 1922 for Eugène Canseliet and the nights of May 9 and 10 for Parsifal.»Dubois enuncia como posible que una dedicatoria dirigida a Aor por un soldado llamado Parsifal remita a esa transmutación, y consigna a la vez la discrepancia de fechas que lo estorba: septiembre de 1922 contra las noches del 9 y 10 de mayo. El desacuerdo queda a la vista sin resolverse.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«The name ELIE, which is not unknown to alchemists, appears in the dedication itself.»Dubois anota el nombre ELIE dentro de esa dedicatoria y su resonancia entre alquimistas, sin explicarla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«Also in 1922, René Schwaller left Paris, severing all contacts with esoteric groups, notably with the group of alchemists who had gathered around Pierre Dujols and Julien Champagne.»Dubois data en 1922 la salida de Schwaller de París y su ruptura con los grupos esotéricos, el de Dujols y Champagne incluido.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«But he continued to send Champagne the monthly allowance according to their agreement.»Dubois anota que el pago mensual a Champagne siguió pese a esa ruptura, conforme al contrato.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«In the book Feu du Soleil, by Robert Amadou, Eugène Canseliet reports that Fulcanelli left in 1922 and that he did not see him again until 1952 (the date when Schwaller returned to Europe to settle in the south of France at Plan-de-Grasse, after a stay of fifteen years in Egypt. He had left France in 1938).»Dubois pone en paralelo dos series de fechas sin declarar la conclusión: Canseliet data en 1922 la marcha de Fulcanelli y en 1952 el reencuentro, y esos son los años en que Schwaller sale de París y vuelve a Europa. El paréntesis con la cronología de Schwaller es de ella.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«In 1975, in the course of a conversation in Salt Lake City, Eugène Canseliet confided to Frater Albertus that Fulcanelli had made a second transmutation in the fall of 1937.»Dubois data en 1975 y en Salt Lake City la confidencia de Canseliet a Frater Albertus sobre una segunda transmutación de Fulcanelli en el otoño de 1937.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«In his book The Alchemist of the Rocky Mountains, Frater Albertus Spagyricus (alias Albert Riedel) relates the details of the experiment that proceeded at the Château de Léré, which belonged to Pierre de Lesseps.»Dubois identifica la fuente de ese relato, *The Alchemist of the Rocky Mountains* de Frater Albertus Spagyricus, alias Albert Riedel, y sitúa la escena en el castillo de Léré.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«According to him, Fulcanelli transmuted 225 grams of lead into gold and 100 grams of silver into uranium in the presence of two physicists, a chemist, and a geologist.»Dubois transcribe las cifras de Frater Albertus —plomo en oro y plata en uranio, ante dos físicos, un químico y un geólogo— y las adjudica a él con *according to him*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«He would have mentioned that the catalytic “powder of projection” [one form of the philosopher’s stone] was derived from iron pyrites (FeS).»Dubois consigna en condicional el origen que Frater Albertus daba al polvo de proyección, la pirita de hierro; el corchete que glosa el polvo como forma de la piedra filosofal es del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«After this operation, Fulcanelli disappeared permanently.»Dubois cierra el relato de la segunda transmutación con la desaparición definitiva de Fulcanelli, que es el punto de partida de toda la leyenda posterior.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 47»

«Frater Albertus asking for the source of his information. The response he received was that it came from an interview that Frater Albertus had with Eugène Canseliet in 1975.»Dubois cierra la cadena de transmisión de esa historia: Rayner Johnson preguntó a Frater Albertus por su fuente y la respuesta remitió a la entrevista con Canseliet de 1975, de modo que todo el relato descansa en un solo testigo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«René Schwaller had become Schwaller de Lubicz by right of the honor to use the appellation “de Lubicz,” which was bestowed on him on January 10, 1919, by the Lithuanian poet Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz»Dubois data el 10 de enero de 1919 la concesión del apellido *de Lubicz* a Schwaller por el poeta lituano Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«The two men met in Paris in the Theosophical Society, which René Schwaller frequented from 1913 to 1916.»Dubois sitúa el encuentro entre ambos en la Sociedad Teosófica, que Schwaller frecuentó entre 1913 y 1916.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«They were both interested in heraldry and particularly in the possible relation between the coat of arms and reincarnation. When in each other’s company, they called each other “brothers in arms.”»Dubois consigna el interés común de los dos por la heráldica y por su posible relación con la reencarnación, y el tratamiento que se daban.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«It was René Schwaller who revealed to Milosz the meaning of the alchemical path.»Dubois invierte la dirección esperable de la influencia: fue Schwaller quien reveló a Milosz el sentido de la vía alquímica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«In a letter dated August 10, 1936, and addressed to Dom Bernard Geradon, Milosz alludes to a certain matter known to alchemists:»Dubois data el 10 de agosto de 1936 la carta de Milosz a Dom Bernard Geradon que va a transcribir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«Today, following the fifth cryptographic exploration of the Two Testaments, I find myself constrained to remain silent on certain points that I have not yet communicated to the Vicar of Our Lord: the first concerns a physical substance that, so to say, has been put into my hands and that explains the longevity of personages included in the genealogy from Adam to Seth up to Noah and an unpublished fragment of “Deux Messianismes politiques” [Two Political Messianic Movements].»[Milosz, carta de 1936, transcrita por Dubois] el poeta declara callar sobre una sustancia física puesta en sus manos que explicaría la longevidad de los patriarcas de Adán a Noé; el corchete que traduce el título es del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 48»

«In the most natural way, these truths derive from the immediate knowledge of a certain substance that has been described in almost identical terms by all the ancient chemists, a substance, moreover, whose common and sacred names each of us utters every day, especially between the fall and spring equinoxes. . . . Let us add, however, before leaving this subject that the material in question resembles only very distantly the mysterious “nostoc.”»[Milosz, misma carta] la sustancia se describe por lo que no se nombra: la conocen todos los químicos antiguos en términos casi iguales, su nombre común y sagrado se pronuncia a diario sobre todo entre los equinoccios, y solo de lejos se parece al nostoc. El tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana; empieza en la 48 con el pasaje sobre los peregrinos a Compostela.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«In 1917, Schwaller organized meetings for the exchange of opinions on different topics, which quickly evolved into purely metaphysical debates.»Dubois data en 1917 las reuniones de Schwaller que derivaron en debates metafísicos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«After the end of the war (in 1919), this movement took the name Les Veilleurs (the Watchers) and was supported by Gaston Revel’s journal, which changed its name from Le Théosophe to Le Veilleur.»Dubois data en 1919 el nombre de Les Veilleurs para ese movimiento y el cambio de cabecera de la revista de Gaston Revel.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«This name was inspired by the unpublished novel of Nicolas Beaudoin entitled Les Veilleurs de la Nuit (The Watchers of the Night).»Dubois atribuye el nombre del grupo a una novela inédita de Nicolas Beaudoin.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«The editorial columns of the journal addressed various political and social issues, and articles were signed “Aor,”k the mystical name of René Schwaller, which he had received, according to some, by revelation, and according to others, during his time spent at the Theosophical Society.»Dubois consigna el seudónimo Aor con que firmaba Schwaller y da dos versiones de su origen —revelación o Sociedad Teosófica— sin decidir entre ellas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«Whatever the case may be, the name means “light,” and Schwaller honored it all his life.»Dubois traduce el nombre Aor por luz y renuncia expresamente a arbitrar entre las dos versiones de su origen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«This “fraternity of watchers” was based on an association called Le Centre Apostolique, which had as a motto “Hierarchy-Fraternity-Liberty.”»Dubois sitúa Les Veilleurs sobre una asociación llamada Le Centre Apostolique y transcribe su divisa, que sustituye la igualdad republicana por la jerarquía.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«According to Pierre Mariel, it was really a kind of occultist synarchy (i.e., based on joint rule) supporting a political-social messianism⁹ that was inspired in part by the ideas of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, notably of the corporate movement.»Dubois adjudica a Pierre Mariel la lectura política del grupo como sinarquía ocultista con mesianismo político-social de raíz saintyvesiana, y la da como suya de él.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«This association was directed by a closed group otherwise called Frères de l’Ordre Mystique de la Résurrection (Brothers of the Mystical Order of the Resurrection).»Dubois consigna el grupo cerrado que dirigía la asociación y su nombre interno.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«A journal called l’Affranchi published the thought of the Centre Apostolique and dealt with social questions.»Dubois nombra la revista que difundía al Centre Apostolique y su materia social.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«Jeanne Germain, wife of Georges Lamy, the shipping magnate from Caen. She was better known by the nomen mysticum of Isha, and in 1927, after being widowed, she became the wife of René Schwaller.»Dubois identifica a Isha como Jeanne Germain, viuda del naviero Georges Lamy y casada con Schwaller en 1927.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«Louis Allainguillaume (born in Caen, France, in 1878; died in Cardiff, Wales, in 1946), father of Isha’s two sons. He was a wealthy coal merchant.»Dubois da las fechas y el oficio de Louis Allainguillaume, comerciante de carbón y padre de los dos hijos de Isha.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«René Schwaller was employed in his business and organized the finances so that its fortunes, already flourishing, soared even further.»Dubois consigna el empleo de Schwaller en ese negocio y el efecto de su gestión financiera.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«Louis Allainguillaume therefore accorded Schwaller significant dividends, which allowed the scholar to pursue his own research in complete tranquillity and to hand over to Jean-Julien Champagne a healthy sum each month.»Dubois identifica el origen del dinero con que Schwaller pagaba a Champagne: los dividendos que le daba Allainguillaume. La cadena económica que sostiene su hipótesis queda así documentada hasta el final.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 49»

«Carlos Larronde, journalist and poet. He was a great friend of Milosz and the founder of the Théâtre Idéaliste, which, for lack of financing, had a short history (1914– 17).»Dubois incluye entre los Veilleurs al periodista y poeta Carlos Larronde, amigo de Milosz y fundador del Théâtre Idéaliste.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«The chemist and astrologer Henri Coton-Alvart, who had as a disciple Dr. Emerit.»Dubois incluye al químico y astrólogo Henri Coton-Alvart, con el doctor Emerit por discípulo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«He quickly departed from this movement in order to seclude himself in a beneficial solitude that allowed him to achieve success in his alchemical endeavors.»Dubois consigna la salida temprana de Coton-Alvart del grupo y su retiro, al que atribuye el éxito de sus trabajos alquímicos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«According to a witness who had known him for a period of fifteen years, he obtained the philosopher’s stone.»Dubois adjudica a un testigo anónimo de quince años de trato la afirmación de que Coton-Alvart obtuvo la piedra filosofal, y no la suscribe por su cuenta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«This initiatory order met in the house that belonged to Balzac on the rue Raynouard.»Dubois localiza las reuniones de los Veilleurs en la casa de Balzac de la rue Raynouard.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«The outer circle of the Fraternité des Veilleurs included numerous sympathizers. Among them were Henri de Regnier, Paul Fort, Fernand Léger, Georges Polti, Pierre Benoit, and Camille Flammarion.»Dubois distingue un círculo exterior de simpatizantes del grupo y nombra a Fernand Léger, Paul Fort, Pierre Benoit y Camille Flammarion entre ellos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«In 1921, Aor decided to suspend the existence of this movement as well as the journal Le Veilleur.»Dubois data en 1921 la suspensión del movimiento y de su revista por decisión de Aor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«According to Jacques Buge, in his interesting book on Milosz, this action was the result of the departure of Milosz, Beaudoin, Bruyez, and Larronde, who were opposed to the spiritualistic practices that had overtaken the metaphysical discussions.»Dubois atribuye a Jacques Buge la explicación de esa disolución: la salida de Milosz, Beaudoin, Bruyez y Larronde, opuestos a las prácticas espiritistas que habían invadido los debates.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«During the war years, which he spent in Paris, Schwaller had drafted a manuscript on the subject of the Gothic cathedrals, dear to his heart, and on alchemical symbolism.»Dubois vuelve al manuscrito de Schwaller sobre las catedrales góticas y el simbolismo alquímico, redactado en París durante la guerra: es la pieza central de su hipótesis de autoría.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«He showed it to Champagne, who seemed interested and suggested he submit his work to a publisher. Because he was well connected to the publishing world, Champagne took on the task of finding one.»Dubois narra el ofrecimiento de Champagne de buscarle editor, valiéndose de sus contactos en el mundo editorial.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«At the time, Schwaller was preparing to leave for Engadine, Switzerland (the region around Saint-Moritz), where, accompanied by Isha and a few faithful friends, he was going to build a scientific installation called Suhalia.»Dubois sitúa la marcha de Schwaller a la Engadina suiza para levantar Suhalia, con Isha y unos pocos fieles.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«It was to be a kind of initiatory monastery equipped with an observatory, run by the astronomer Juvisy, and a highly advanced chemical laboratory. In addition, it would house a foundry, a print shop, and a weaving workshop supporting the development of crafts. Last, there was to be an installation to support research in physics, spectroscopy, micrography, and electricity.»Dubois describe Suhalia como monasterio iniciático con observatorio, laboratorio químico, fundición, imprenta, taller de tejido e instalaciones de física, espectroscopía, micrografía y electricidad: la escala del proyecto mide los recursos de Schwaller.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«Work on plants helped the group at Suhalia to develop a homeopathic pharmacopoeia with very effective tinctures.»Dubois consigna el trabajo con plantas de Suhalia y la farmacopea homeopática que produjo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«For seven years, until 1927, Aor-Schwaller taught his philosophical doctrine to members of this community. An internal document he created for the group helped him in this teaching.»Dubois data hasta 1927 los siete años de enseñanza de Schwaller a la comunidad, con un documento interno de apoyo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 51»

«In March 1925 Champagne moved to 59A rue Rochechouart, where he occupied a very modestly furnished garret on the sixth floor. His immediate neighbor was his disciple Eugène Canseliet; the men were separated only by the washroom on their floor.»Dubois data en marzo de 1925 el traslado de Champagne a una buhardilla de la rue Rochechouart, pared con pared con Canseliet: la vecindad importa porque es el año siguiente al de la aparición de *Le Mystère*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 52»

«Champagne was scrupulously careful to hide his relations with Schwaller from his disciples, notably from Dujols. He had, in fact, asked Schwaller not to meet him when any of his entourage was present.»Dubois consigna que Champagne ocultaba a sus discípulos, y a Dujols en particular, su trato con Schwaller, y que pedía a este no coincidir con ellos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 52»

«In order to conform to this strategy, all the correspondence that they exchanged—even the monthly allowance sent to Champagne— was sent through Champagne’s brother-in-law, Gaston Devaux, who lived in the Somme département and acted as a forwarding address for Champagne.»Dubois documenta el dispositivo de ese ocultamiento: correspondencia y mensualidad desviadas por el cuñado de Champagne, Gaston Devaux, que hacía de domicilio pantalla. El detalle es el que sostiene su tesis de un pacto deliberadamente escondido.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 52»

«In Robert Amadou’s Feu du Soleil, Eugène Canseliet presents Gaston Devaux as “Fulcanelli’s secretary.”»Dubois señala que el mismo Gaston Devaux que servía de domicilio pantalla aparece en el *Feu du Soleil* presentado por Canseliet como secretario de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Devaux owned a ring identical to Canseliet’s ring with a baphomet. Long after the death of the painter Champagne, Canseliet continued to travel to the Devaux home in the Somme.»Dubois anota el anillo con bafometo que Devaux tenía igual al de Canseliet y las visitas de este a la casa del Somme mucho después de muerto Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Gaston Devaux, who died in 1969, stated in 1952 that the Fulcanelli affair was completely fabricated; a hoax. Contrary to the opinion of his descendants, Devaux was keenly interested in alchemy.»Dubois transcribe la declaración de Devaux de 1952, que llama al asunto Fulcanelli fabricación entera y engaño, y objeta a los descendientes de él en un punto: Devaux sí se interesaba por la alquimia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Jean-Julien Champagne had his peculiarities: He detested electricity, for example, and preferred to use oil lamps. He dressed in an outmoded fashion, sported a handlebar mustache, and wore his hair long.»Dubois retrata las rarezas de Champagne —aversión a la electricidad, lámparas de aceite, atuendo anticuado— como parte del personaje que iba componiendo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«He gave the impression of not belonging to his own century, always buried as he was in reading ancient authors and having a fondness for the Middle Ages, which he did not consider a dark period at all.»Dubois anota que Champagne daba impresión de no pertenecer a su siglo y que no tenía la Edad Media por época oscura.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«He also had the custom of compartmentalizing his different relationships: He would meet with people belonging to different groups who never had any contact with each other.»Dubois destaca la costumbre de Champagne de mantener incomunicados sus distintos círculos: es la práctica que, en su relato, hace posible el engaño.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«He pretended to be horrified by occultism, but attended meetings such as those of the Grand Lunaire and even those of the Veilleurs.»Dubois consigna la contradicción entre el horror declarado de Champagne por el ocultismo y su asistencia a las reuniones del Grand Lunaire y de los Veilleurs.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«All his life he wove the veil that was intended to establish the Fulcanelli myth.»Dubois enuncia su adjudicación en una línea: la construcción del mito de Fulcanelli fue obra de Champagne y le llevó toda la vida.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«The comical aspect of this business was that at the dawn of the twentieth century, a time so full of reason, no one doubted any of this.»Dubois señala como cómico que nadie dudara del asunto en un siglo que se tenía por racional.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Everyone simply latched on to these books that were full of the promise of longevity and omniscience and so on.»Dubois explica esa credulidad por lo que los libros prometían: longevidad y omnisciencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Champagne devoted years to maintaining the fiction of Fulcanelli’s vocation as an adept. He had launched this fiction, and it was maintained by the whole group around him, all of whom must have promoted the myth: Gaston Sauvage, the Chacornacs, Pierre Dujols, Canseliet, Jules Boucher.»Dubois reparte la responsabilidad: Champagne lanzó la ficción y todo el grupo la sostuvo —Sauvage, los Chacornac, Dujols, Canseliet, Boucher—, aunque el sostén lo enuncia en probabilidad, *must have promoted*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«They formed the mysterious Fraternité d’Héliopolis (F.C.H.), whose double name had perhaps been borrowed from the Belgian lodge of the Memphis-Misraïm Rite, which, in 1839, called itself Les Sages d’Héliopolis.»Dubois deriva el nombre de la Fraternité d’Héliopolis de una logia belga del rito de Memphis-Misraim de 1839, y conserva la reserva: *perhaps*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Eugène Canseliet placed the birth of Fulcanelli in 1839, the year of the establishment of this lodge.»Dubois hace coincidir el año de nacimiento que Canseliet daba a Fulcanelli con el de fundación de esa logia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«This was a gesture, a reference, a broad wink in the direction of the eminently Freemasonic circle around Pierre Dujols and Champagne.»Dubois lee esa coincidencia como guiño deliberado al medio masónico de Dujols y Champagne, y no como azar.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Thomas,l an associate of the bookstore owner and of the painter, had this affiliation, as did Oswald Wirth, Guénon, Chacornac, Marc Haven, Boucher, and Ferdinand de Lesseps, in whose honor the Masonic feast was given in 1876.»Dubois enumera a los masones del círculo —Thomas, Wirth, Guénon, Chacornac, Marc Haven, Boucher— y añade a Ferdinand de Lesseps, homenajeado en una fiesta masónica de 1876.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«It is probable that the de Lesseps children also belonged to the Freemasonry movement.»Dubois enuncia como probable, y no como sabida, la pertenencia masónica de los hijos de Lesseps.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«In 1880, Pierre Dujols had been bedridden with rheumatoid arthritis for four years already. Because of a tenuous financial situation, his wife found herself obliged to work in order to subsidize the needs of the family. No one came forward to help them.»Dubois describe la penuria de la casa Dujols, con la mujer obligada a trabajar y sin ayuda de nadie; el año que imprime el volumen —1880— no cuadra con la postración que en la plana 32 data en 1921, y aquí queda tal cual.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Champagne brought them some money from time to time, but he often spent it drinking on the way there.»Dubois anota que el dinero que Champagne llevaba a los Dujols menguaba por el camino en bebida.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«The Librairie du Merveilleux was sold. Dujols was succeeded by a Father Lequesne, a bookstore dealer, initiate, radiologist, and healer who used spiritual magnetism.»Dubois consigna la venta de la librería y a su sucesor, un padre Lequesne, librero, iniciado, radiólogo y sanador por magnetismo espiritual.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«During his long years in bed, Pierre Dujols devoted his time to writing copious notes on alchemical symbolism. He shared with Champagne a veneration of Basile Valentin and Flamel. They worked on the traditional path and were preoccupied with the notion of SEL.»Dubois sitúa en los años de cama la redacción por Dujols de sus copiosas notas sobre simbolismo alquímico —el material que su tesis pondrá dentro de *Les Demeures*— y anota lo que compartía con Champagne: la veneración de Basilio Valentín y de Flamel y la noción de SEL, en versalitas del original.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 55»

«Champagne traveled and, in the course of his moving around, undertook to reproduce sculptures that seemed to him to have arisen from an alchemical intent.»Dubois consigna el trabajo de Champagne reproduciendo esculturas que él tenía por alquímicas: esos dibujos son los que ilustran los libros firmados.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«This is how he came to design the caissons of the Lallemant Hotel while he was staying near Bourges and living at the chateau of the de Lesseps family at Léré.»Dubois adjudica a Champagne los artesonados del hotel Lallemant, dibujados durante su estancia en el castillo de los Lesseps en Léré.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«In the département of the Somme, he investigated the cathedral at Amiens and fairly regularly stayed with his sister, who lived in the département along with her husband, Gaston Devaux.»Dubois enlaza el estudio de la catedral de Amiens con las estancias de Champagne en casa de su hermana y su cuñado Devaux; Amiens es uno de los capítulos de *Le Mystère*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«He also traveled to Limoux, where, accompanied by his faithful disciple Eugène Canseliet, he visited the cathedral of Notre Dame in Marceille.»Dubois anota el viaje de Champagne y Canseliet a Limoux y a Notre-Dame de Marceille.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«Dujols and Champagne set to work on Schwaller’s notes on the cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris and in particular on its relation to hermetic science.»Dubois enuncia la operación central de su hipótesis: Dujols y Champagne trabajando sobre las notas de Schwaller acerca de Notre-Dame de París y su relación con la ciencia hermética.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«Dujols brought to this endeavor his remarkable learning and Champagne contributed his talent as a designer and engineer.»Dubois reparte los aportes de cada uno a ese trabajo: la erudición de Dujols y el dibujo y la ingeniería de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«They restructured the work, enlarged it, layering it with their prodigious knowledge in the field, and Champagne confided the whole content to Eugène Canseliet in order to support the purported existence of the mysterious adept.»Dubois describe el resultado como reestructuración y ampliación de la obra ajena, y añade el paso decisivo: Champagne entregó el conjunto a Canseliet para apuntalar la existencia supuesta del adepto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«This is how it came about that, on June 15, 1926, Le Mystère des Cathédrales was published, by Jean Schémit in Paris, under the pseudonym Fulcanelli, and to the considerable amazement of Schwaller, who was at the time at Suhalia in Switzerland.»Dubois data el 15 de junio de 1926 la publicación de *Le Mystère des Cathédrales* por Jean Schémit bajo el seudónimo, y sitúa a Schwaller en Suiza y atónito.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«He recognized his work—the work that he had loaned to Champagne in the years 1920–22.»Dubois afirma que Schwaller reconoció en el libro su propio trabajo, el prestado a Champagne entre 1920 y 1922; en la plana 51 el préstamo se sitúa en los años de guerra, y las dos dataciones quedan como las imprime el volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«Later he said to André VandenBroeck, “I’ve been taken by Fulcanelli, my ideas have been taken; well, at least now it’s written down.”»Dubois transcribe por VandenBroeck la reacción de Schwaller, que da sus ideas por tomadas y se consuela con que al menos quedaran escritas: es el testimonio más fuerte que aporta a favor de su tesis, y es de segunda mano.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«He always called Champagne Fulcanelli.»Dubois consigna en una línea la identificación que Schwaller hacía, y que es la de su propia tesis: para él, Fulcanelli era el nombre de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«As for Pierre Dujols, it is not clear that he was ever informed of the provenance of the notes that Champagne presented to him. He was a very pious man and apparently a man of great integrity.»Dubois exculpa a Dujols con reserva doble: no está claro que supiera de dónde salían las notas, y su integridad la enuncia como aparente.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«The spiritual quest that Schwaller was pursuing was such that he did not take Champagne to task for his thieving, and he even continued to send him the agreed-upon allowance while Jean-Julien Champagne, in his laboratory, concentrated on the resolution of the problem of colors in the stained-glass windows at Chartres.»Dubois explica por la búsqueda espiritual de Schwaller que no reclamara a Champagne el robo y siguiera pagándole mientras este trabajaba en los colores de las vidrieras de Chartres.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«But he was completely unsuccessful.»Dubois consigna el fracaso de Champagne en el problema de los colores, que es lo que devuelve el asunto a Schwaller en 1929.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«On April 19 of the same year, 1926, Pierre Dujols died in Paris (see fig. 5.15). His wife withdrew to live with her children, separating herself completely from Jean-Julien Champagne, to whom, however, she was still very connected.»Dubois hace coincidir en 1926 la aparición del libro y la muerte de Dujols el 19 de abril, y consigna la retirada de la viuda y su ruptura con Champagne, pese al vínculo que conservaba.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«Henceforth, she received visits only from Faugeron, the disciple of her husband in alchemy.»Dubois reduce el trato posterior de la viuda de Dujols a un solo visitante, Faugeron.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 56»

«Earlier, she had given him all Dujols’s alchemical files and the notes about monuments having a hermetic character.»Dubois consigna que la viuda entregó a Faugeron todos los archivos alquímicos de Dujols y las notas sobre monumentos herméticos, que son el material del segundo libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«Pierre Dujols had composed many long pages on this topic, and Eugène Canseliet assembled them and submitted them to Champagne, who, in the end, presented the whole document to the publisher Schémit.»Dubois traza la cadena que lleva las páginas de Dujols hasta la imprenta: Canseliet las reunió, Champagne las llevó a Schémit.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«Thus, in 1930, the first edition of Les Demeures Philosophales was offered to the public.»Dubois data en 1930 la primera edición de *Les Demeures Philosophales*, y con ese *Thus* la presenta como resultado de la cadena que acaba de describir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«The family members of Pierre Dujols de Valois were astonished by the complete break of their forebear from this milieu and, above all, from Champagne.»Dubois recoge el asombro de la familia Dujols ante la ruptura de su antepasado con ese medio y con Champagne, y lo usa como indicio de que algo se supo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«We might assume that the alchemist had perhaps revealed the true origin of Le Mystère des Cathédrales, a manuscript stolen from Schwaller and augmented by Pierre Dujols.»Dubois enuncia con doble reserva —*we might assume that … perhaps*— que Champagne revelara a Dujols el origen del libro, y de paso resume su tesis en una fórmula: manuscrito robado a Schwaller y aumentado por Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«As it turned out, this book was considered by Champagne to be imperfect.»Dubois anota que el propio Champagne tenía el libro por imperfecto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«In 1929, Champagne traveled to the south of France, having been invited there by Schwaller, who was living at Lou-Mas-de-Coucagno in Plan-de-Grasse.»Dubois data en 1929 el viaje de Champagne al mediodía francés, invitado por Schwaller a Lou-Mas-de-Coucagno.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«Schwaller’s invitation was addressed to a certain Mr. Hubert. It was in regard to this name that a debate arose between Eugène Canseliet and Robert Ambelain, with Ambelain claiming that Champagne had called himself Hubert and that Hubert was the first name of Champagne’s father and Canseliet disagreeing.»Dubois expone la disputa entre Ambelain y Canseliet sobre el nombre Hubert, sobrescrito de la invitación, y da la posición de cada uno sin fundirlas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«This bitter exchange was related to the interpretation by Robert Ambelain of the closing chord of Le Mystère des Cathédrales, for we find on the last page of that book the inscription UBER CAMPA AGNA, or, phonetically, Hubert Champagne, which reveals that Robert Ambelain was right: Champagne did indeed have the first name Hubert, which his death certificate in fact records»Dubois toma partido por Ambelain apoyándose en dos piezas: la inscripción de la última página de *Le Mystère*, que leída fonéticamente da el nombre del pintor, y el acta de defunción de Champagne, que registra ese nombre de pila.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 57»

«also Hubert, taking it as his own in order to pass for an age that his appearance belied.»Dubois cierra el argumento del nombre remitiendo a la cédula del padre sustraída en la plana 46, que llevaba el mismo nombre de pila; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana y empieza en la 57 con *If we remember, he had pinched the identity card of his father, whose first name was*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«In this way Robert Ambelain demonstrated that Fulcanelli was Champagne and that Champagne had signed his book in a cabalistic manner.»Dubois enuncia la conclusión de Ambelain como suya de él —la identidad de Fulcanelli con Champagne y la firma cabalística del libro— y la suscribe sin matizarla, que es de las pocas veces en que no reserva.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«During his stay at the home of the Schwaller de Lubicz family in Plan-de-Grasse (fig. 5.17), Champagne exchanged ideas with Aor while strolling on the broad avenue that led to the house.»Dubois sitúa las conversaciones de Champagne con Aor en el paseo de la casa de Plan-de-Grasse.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«In memory of this time, it came to be called the Allée des philosophes, “Philosophers’ Walk”»Dubois anota el nombre que quedó a ese paseo en recuerdo de aquellas conversaciones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«The men conversed about the theory and practice of the alchemical Great Work and Champagne carried out experiments in the highly advanced laboratory that René Schwaller had installed in his house.»Dubois reparte otra vez los papeles en esa estancia: conversación sobre teoría y práctica de la Gran Obra, y experimentos de Champagne en el laboratorio de Schwaller.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«Steadily, Schwaller established the doctrine that was drawn from the study of the manuscript on colors. The two were close to success.»Dubois atribuye a Schwaller la doctrina extraída del manuscrito de los colores y da a los dos por cerca del resultado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«Lucie Lamy, the daughter-in-law of René Schwaller, did not think much of the alchemist. Later she said as much, explaining that he behaved in an obnoxious manner and that he was very taken by drink. In fact, he did not correspond at all to her idea of a philosopher.»Dubois recoge el juicio adverso de Lucie Lamy sobre Champagne —modales desagradables y bebida— y lo consigna junto al reconocimiento que Schwaller le hacía en la plana 44, sin armonizar los dos retratos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 58»

«It is during this period that René Schwaller drew a portrait of his collaborator: a drawing in red ink in which Champagne appears with long hair, as he liked to wear it. The work is dated 1930 and carries on the back the annotation “Fulcanelli”»Dubois presenta como pieza mayor un retrato de Champagne dibujado por Schwaller, fechado en 1930 y anotado al dorso con el seudónimo: el propio Schwaller rotulando Fulcanelli la cara de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 59»

«During the meals, in the dining room where there hung a chandelier constructed with the glass of Chartres (blues and reds), Aor loved to teach.»[el arquitecto de la casa, transcrito por Dubois] recuerda las comidas bajo una lámpara hecha con vidrio de Chartres, azul y rojo, con Aor enseñando: el resultado del experimento colgaba del techo del comedor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 59»

«His daughter-in-law, Lucie, did not have the right to interrupt, nor, by the way, the right to leave the house. She lived as a recluse.»[el arquitecto] describe la reclusión de Lucie Lamy en esa casa, sin derecho a interrumpir ni a salir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 59»

«Isha was just the opposite. She was very distinguished, a great lady, always well dressed. Aor regarded her highly, calling her “my great friend.”»[el arquitecto] contrapone a esa reclusión la posición de Isha en la casa y el trato que Aor le daba.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 59»

«Aor was an extremely gifted and intelligent being. He believed in everything mysterious. His work in Egypt had made him known throughout the world.»[el arquitecto] retrata a Schwaller como hombre dotadísimo que creía en todo lo misterioso, conocido en el mundo por su trabajo en Egipto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«The architect recalls: . . . [I]n Pennsylvania, when Aor was at the university, the community of official Egyptologists made fun of him because his method was linked to the pseudoscience of the Egyptians.»[el arquitecto] recuerda la burla de los egiptólogos oficiales en Pensilvania por el método de Schwaller; el corchete de la mayúscula y los puntos de omisión son del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«His son-in-law, Jean Lamy, was a medical doctor who was a sensitive diagnostician. He prescribed homeopathic medicines using tinctures that had been developed at Suhalia and used an apparatus invented by René Schwaller: the phonophoresis.»[el arquitecto] describe a Jean Lamy recetando tinturas homeopáticas de Suhalia y usando la fonoforesis, aparato inventado por Schwaller.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«It was he who in the latter years supported the whole household. As a result, he was saddened by the fact that he had been unable to assemble the few million centimes required to publish the books of his father-in-law.»[el arquitecto] consigna que Jean Lamy mantuvo la casa en los últimos años y no reunió lo necesario para publicar los libros de su suegro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«A disciple of Isha who lived for a few years near this exceptional family also offers insights into Schwaller:»Dubois introduce un segundo testigo del hogar, una discípula de Isha, sin nombrarla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«According to her, Aor was a man of advanced spiritual quality who showed great kindness to everyone and whose telepathic abilities could not be doubted.»[la discípula de Isha, según Dubois] atribuye a Aor calidad espiritual y facultades telepáticas; la atribución es de la testigo y Dubois la marca con *according to her*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«Although he attached no importance to it, for he was very humble, he had the ability to anticipate everyone’s questions and to respond to them in a subtle way.»[la discípula] describe la manera de Schwaller de anticiparse a las preguntas, y le atribuye humildad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«As for his alchemical work, it seemed not to be Aor’s principal activity. He was first and foremost an “inspired” Egyptologist whose work, still not understood by official academia, nevertheless shows that he had a total understanding of the sacred science of the Egyptians.»[la discípula] acota el lugar de la alquimia en la obra de Schwaller: no era su actividad principal, y ante todo era egiptólogo, con la academia oficial sin entenderlo. La acotación importa a la tesis del libro, porque rebaja a Schwaller como candidato a alquimista.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«It was the result of her revelations on two occasions that allowed him to discover the sacred alphabet of the Egyptians.»[la discípula] adjudica a dos revelaciones de Isha el hallazgo del alfabeto sagrado egipcio por Schwaller.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«We should recall, however, that Isha did not know René Schwaller when he was very close to Jean-Julien Champagne.»Dubois acota el valor de ese testimonio recordando que Isha no conoció a Schwaller en los años de su trato estrecho con Champagne, y con ello mide qué puede y qué no puede saber esa rama del hogar.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«After his time in the south of France, Champagne returned for a few months to Paris, then, in 1930, was called back to Plan-de-Grasse. His suitcase still carried the tags for his trips south.»Dubois data en 1930 el segundo llamado de Champagne a Plan-de-Grasse y apoya el viaje en un detalle material, las etiquetas de la maleta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«That same year, 1930, René Schwaller and Jean-Julien Champagne were positioned to solve the problem whose solution they had been pursuing for nineteen years: that of the fabrication of the blues and reds of the stained-glass windows of, for instance, Chartres Cathedral—certainly no small feat.»Dubois cifra en diecinueve años la busca del azul y el rojo de las vidrieras de Chartres y sitúa en 1930 el momento en que ambos estuvieron en condiciones de resolverlo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«Aor understood the theory. According to Mr. VandenBroeck, he imposed a severe protocol, based on draconian conditions»Dubois adjudica a Schwaller la teoría y el protocolo severo del experimento, y remite el dato a VandenBroeck.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 61»

«Champagne plunged into the work and, following Schwaller’s directives combined with his own extraordinary mastery, which everyone recognized, he began the experiment.»Dubois reparte una vez más los papeles en el experimento decisivo: directivas de Schwaller y mano de Champagne, cuya maestría dice reconocida por todos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«It was a success, as René Schwaller was to confirm later to Mr. VandenBroeck: He described for me the separation of sulfur carried out on copper.»Dubois da el experimento por logrado y funda el juicio en lo que Schwaller contó a VandenBroeck: una separación del azufre sobre cobre.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«A colored luminosity spread over the cinders of the material. The tinting mass represented the essential dyeing within the colored glass.¹⁶ The Chartres glass is dyed in its mass by the volatile spirit of metals.»[Schwaller por VandenBroeck, transcrito por Dubois] describe el resultado como luminosidad coloreada sobre las cenizas y enuncia la tesis técnica: el vidrio de Chartres está teñido en su masa por el espíritu volátil de los metales.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«The famous letter published by Eugène Canseliet in the preface to the second edition of Le Mystère des Cathèdrales (1957) and attributed to Fulcanelli actually outlines this operation and speaks of its success.»Dubois identifica la operación descrita con la que relata la carta atribuida a Fulcanelli que Canseliet publicó en el prefacio de 1957: la carta pasa así, en su lectura, de mensaje del adepto a acuse de recibo de este experimento. La grafía *Cathèdrales* con acento grave es la que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«Dear Old Friend: This time you have truly received God’s Gift; it is a great grace, and for the first time I understand how rare this favor is.»[carta atribuida a Fulcanelli, transcrita por Dubois] el remitente felicita a su corresponsal por haber recibido el Don de Dios y declara comprender por primera vez lo raro del favor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«At last you have the Treasure of Treasures, and let us give thanks to the Divine Light that has made you a participant in it. You have, by the way, justly deserved it through your unshakable trust in Truth, your constancy of effort, your perseverance in sacrifice, and also, let us not forget . . . through your good works.»[misma carta] el remitente atribuye el logro al mérito del destinatario —confianza en la verdad, constancia, sacrificio y buenas obras— y a la Luz divina.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«When my wife told me this good news, I was dumbfounded by joyful surprise and I was beside myself with happiness, so much so that I said to myself: Let’s hope that this hour of intoxication is not paid for by some dreadful tomorrow.»[misma carta] el remitente cuenta que la noticia le llegó por su mujer y teme que la euforia se pague; el detalle de la intermediaria es de los que Dubois usará para situar al firmante.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«But although I was informed only in summary fashion of the event, I believe I have understood, and this reassures me in the certainty that the fire does not die until the Work is done and until the entire tinting mass impregnates the glass, which, from one decantation to the next, remains absolutely saturated and becomes as luminous as the sun.»[misma carta] el remitente declara haber sabido del hecho solo en resumen y describe el punto de la operación: el fuego no muere hasta que la masa tintórea impregna el vidrio y este queda luminoso como el sol.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«It was also in the year 1930, on September 15, that the second book by Fulcanelli-Champagne was offered to the public: Les Demeures Philosophales et le Symbolisme Hermétique dans Ses Rapports avec l’Art Sacré et l’Ésotérisme du Grand-Oeuvre (The Dwellings of the Philosophers and Hermetic Symbolism in Their Relationship to the Sacred Art and the Esotericism of the Great Work),¹⁷ which was the work of both Champagne and Pierre Dujols before his death.»Dubois data el 15 de septiembre de 1930 *Les Demeures Philosophales*, escribe el nombre del autor como Fulcanelli-Champagne y adjudica el libro a Champagne y a Dujols, este ya muerto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«Eugène Canseliet had the role of simply assembling the notes. Later, after the death of his master Champagne, Canseliet ventured to expand the republished editions.»Dubois reduce el papel de Canseliet en ese libro al de compilador de notas, y añade que después de muerto Champagne amplió las reediciones: la obra impresa hoy no sería, en su lectura, la de 1930.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«Once again, according to Mr. VandenBroeck, after this conclusive experiment, Champagne changed completely. He returned to Paris in a state of great excitement, completely set on continuing along this path and repeating this operation.»Dubois remite otra vez a VandenBroeck para el cambio de Champagne tras el experimento y su empeño en repetirlo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«As Champagne and Schwaller had agreed in their earlier contract, the monthly allowance was to end at this point and all trace of an association between Schwaller and Champagne was to be effaced.»Dubois recuerda las dos cláusulas de cierre del contrato: fin de la mensualidad y borrado de todo rastro de la asociación. La segunda es la que explicaría el silencio documental sobre el que trabaja el libro entero.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«This experiment had put the finishing touches on their break from one another. For a year, Champagne kept his word and made no allusion to their laboratory work.»Dubois consigna que el experimento consumó la ruptura y que Champagne guardó el pacto durante un año.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 62»

«In a letterp addressed to René Schwaller a year after the death of the painter, Eugène Canseliet conveys his disappointment in having been kept at a distance: “Might it not be that Mr. Champagne has once again shown, with respect to this material aspect of your work, a memory lapse that is as surprising as it is incomprehensible»Dubois cita una carta de Canseliet a Schwaller escrita un año después de morir Champagne, en la que se queja de haber sido mantenido a distancia y atribuye a Champagne un olvido incomprensible respecto de la parte material del trabajo de Schwaller; la carta entera va traducida en el apéndice F.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 63»

«In this period of separation, Julien Champagne was gravely ill: He limped, drank absinthe, and inhaled galbanum to induce visions. He took tinctures to address his illnesses, but it was too late.»Dubois describe el deterioro de Champagne en esos años: cojera, absenta y gálbano inhalado para provocar visiones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 63»

«At this point, according to Mr. VandenBroeck, Champagne wanted to reveal all to his disciples.»Dubois atribuye a VandenBroeck la noticia de que Champagne quiso entonces contarlo todo a sus discípulos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 63»

«In addition, in 1931 he asked René Schwaller by letter to come to Paris for a very important declaration he had to communicate to him.»Dubois data en 1931 la carta con que Champagne llamó a Schwaller a París para una declaración importante.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 63»

«When they met in a little suburban restaurant, Champagne announced his intention to reveal everything about their work, but Schwaller reminded him of their pact and, in exchange for his silence, offered to continue to help him financially.»Dubois narra la escena del restaurante suburbano en que Schwaller, según su relato, compró el silencio de Champagne recordándole el pacto y ofreciéndole seguir manteniéndolo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 63»

«Note the similarity of the handwriting of these two dedications.»[pie de lámina] las figs. 5.21 y 5.22 enfrentan una dedicatoria de Champagne a los Viard con otra de Fulcanelli a Schwaller, y el pie pide al lector comparar las dos letras: el argumento se traslada aquí a la imagen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 63»

«In August of 1932, a very weak Champagne sent another letter to Schwaller, specifying a date that had been fixed for a meeting with his disciples.»Dubois data en agosto de 1932 la última carta de Champagne a Schwaller, con fecha fijada para reunirse con sus discípulos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«Still according to Mr. VandenBroeck, it was a few days before this fateful date that René Schwaller returned to Paris, climbed up straightaway to the alchemist’s garret at 59A rue Rochechouart, and found him in bed.»Dubois vuelve a marcar la fuente —*still according to Mr. VandenBroeck*— para la subida de Schwaller a la buhardilla de la rue Rochechouart días antes de esa fecha.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«Champagne’s skin was black: Gangrene had spread through his leg.»Dubois describe el estado de Champagne, con la gangrena extendida por la pierna.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«Champagne must have considered the situation and, stung by remorse, pointed Schwaller toward a pile of papers, asking him to take with him the manuscript that was to be found there—the manuscript that had begun their long collaboration.»Dubois enuncia en probabilidad —*must have*— el remordimiento de Champagne y la devolución del manuscrito con que había empezado todo: la escena cierra el círculo de su relato y es reconstrucción, no documento.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«This was their last meeting, for the next day, August 26, 1932, at 6:40 A.M., Jean-Julien Champagne died at the age of fifty-five from a blocked artery in his left leg.»Dubois data la muerte de Champagne el 26 de agosto de 1932 a las 6:40, a los cincuenta y cinco años, por arteria obstruida.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«He had not succeeded in producing the philosopher’s stone, the search of his lifetime.»Dubois consigna que Champagne murió sin obtener la piedra filosofal que buscó toda su vida, con lo que separa la maestría técnica que le reconoce del resultado que le niega.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«His sister, Mrs. Gaston Devaux, came to his room, took away some papers, and, to her amazement, discovered enough money to contradict the rumor that his end had taken place in penury. She had believed her brother was penniless and thus often gave him money.»Dubois objeta el rumor de que Champagne murió en la miseria con lo que su hermana encontró en el cuarto, y anota que ella misma lo creía sin recursos y le daba dinero.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«Three days after Marcel Braun performed the registration of death (see fig. 5.24), Jean-Julien Champagne, this uncommon individual belonging to another century, was taken to his final resting place, the cemetery of Arnouville-les-Gonesse»Dubois documenta el entierro de Champagne en Arnouville-les-Gonesse tres días después del registro de defunción hecho por Marcel Braun.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«His brother-in-law, Gaston Devaux, whom Eugène Canseliet claimed was Fulcanelli’s secretary, took care of the funeral and the plot.»Dubois anota que del entierro y la sepultura se ocupó Devaux, el mismo a quien Canseliet llamaba secretario de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«On the grave there appears this epitaph: APOSTOLUS HERMETICAE SCIENTIAE.»Dubois transcribe el epitafio latino de la tumba de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 64»

«initials A. H. S. are part of Fulcanelli’s signature and stand for Apostle of Hermetic Science.»Dubois identifica las iniciales de ese epitafio con parte de la firma de Fulcanelli: la lápida como último argumento de la identificación. El tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 65»

«Hermetic Science) has disappeared, apparently either purposely removed or stolen, but the photo on page 94 shows the plaque in place.»[pie de lámina] la fig. 5.25 muestra la tumba y el pie declara desaparecida la placa del epitafio, por retirada deliberada o robo, remitiendo a otra foto que la muestra en su sitio: la prueba material ya no existe y solo queda su fotografía.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 67»

«Champagne’s sister Renée sent a letter of thanks to René Schwaller de Lubicz on September 21, 1932. From this letter we learn that it was Aor who paid for the enclosure and the tombstone of “his old friend”»Dubois data el 21 de septiembre de 1932 la carta de la hermana de Champagne a Schwaller, y saca de ella que fue Aor quien pagó la sepultura y llamó a Champagne su viejo amigo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 67»

«In 1938, René Schwaller de Lubicz left Lou-Mas-de-Coucagno to settle in Luxor with his whole family. He was to spend fifteen years in Egypt (fourteen of which were in Luxor itself) devoted to the study of pharaonic monuments.»Dubois data en 1938 la marcha de Schwaller a Luxor y cifra en quince años su estancia egipcia dedicada a los monumentos faraónicos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 69»

«Upon his return to Plan-de-Grasse, he assembled his notes with the help of Lucie, who was talented at drawing, and, in 1957, finally published Le Temple de l’Homme.»Dubois data en 1957 *Le Temple de l’Homme*, armado con Lucie Lamy a la vuelta de Egipto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 69»

«It was not until the visit of André VandenBroeck to Grasse in 1959 that Schwaller consented to reveal the relationship that he had maintained with Champagne and the alchemical work they had done together.»Dubois data en 1959 el momento en que Schwaller consintió en contar su relación con Champagne: casi treinta años de silencio, que es lo que hace de VandenBroeck la fuente única de buena parte de este capítulo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 69»

«Corroborating what the author has to say in Al-Kemi, a Memoir: Hermetic, Occult, Political, and Private Aspects of R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz is evidence from researchers who knew René Schwaller well during the time of Les Veilleurs.»Dubois señala que el testimonio de *Al-Kemi* de VandenBroeck concuerda con el de investigadores que trataron a Schwaller en tiempos de Les Veilleurs, sin nombrarlos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 69»

«Aor died on December 7, 1961, at Plan-de-Grasse, followed by his wife, Isha, a year later in Paris.»Dubois data la muerte de Schwaller el 7 de diciembre de 1961 y la de Isha un año después.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 69»

«Pierre Dujols had died in 1926 and Jean-Julien Champagne in 1932. Thus Champagne’s disciple Eugène Canseliet, who was later called “the Master of Savignies,” undertook to establish the alchemical resurgence of the twentieth century.»Dubois abre el capítulo con las dos muertes que dejan a Canseliet solo al frente, y le adjudica el papel de sostener el renacimiento alquímico del siglo XX.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 70»

«He had extensive experience in the laboratory, but undoubtedly spent a great deal of time shoring up the myth of Fulcanelli’s vocation as an adept.»Dubois separa en Canseliet las dos cosas que su libro trata por separado: la experiencia real de laboratorio y el tiempo dedicado a apuntalar el mito del adepto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 70»

«It seems that despite the numerous contradictions found in Eugène Canseliet’s writings about the details of his life in association with Fulcanelli and of Fulcanelli’s identity, Canseliet was the object of manipulations of which he was too young to be aware.»Dubois enuncia con reserva —*it seems*— su lectura de Canseliet como víctima y no cómplice: demasiado joven para advertir las manipulaciones, pese a las muchas contradicciones de sus escritos sobre Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 70»

«Some people, however, do not accept this theory.»Dubois consigna en una línea que hay quien no acepta esa lectura benévola de Canseliet, y no da nombres ni la defiende.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 70»

«In addition, it seems that Eugène Canseliet sincerely believed that behind Jean-Julien Champagne there was another man, the master, the initiator.»Dubois atribuye a Canseliet la creencia sincera en un maestro escondido detrás de Champagne, con la misma reserva de *it seems*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 70»

«The facts and the letter Canseliet wrote to René Schwaller after Champagne’s death (see fig. 6.1) indicate that he was well and truly the disciple of Champagne and that he held him in great esteem, to the point of working with him for seven years, from 1925 to 1932.»Dubois apoya en la carta de Canseliet a Schwaller y en los hechos que su maestro efectivo fue Champagne, con siete años de trabajo juntos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 70»

«Jean-Julien Champagne had always kept secret his meetings with René Schwaller. He had revealed nothing of his long collaboration with Schwaller or of their experiments in the laboratory.»Dubois insiste en el secreto que Champagne guardó ante Canseliet sobre Schwaller y sobre los experimentos comunes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«Eugène Canseliet knew simply that in the last few years of Champagne’s life, ties between the two men had become closer. We could say that he suspected the importance of their collaboration.»Dubois acota lo que Canseliet supo —un acercamiento entre ambos en los últimos años— y marca como conjetura suya, no como dato, que sospechara la importancia de esa colaboración.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«As he wrote to Schwaller, “You demonstrate profound knowledge at the juncture of the primitive androgynous state, as well as highly philosophical concerns—in fact the same as those that gripped Mr. Champagne upon his return from Plan-de-Grasse and which seemed to overturn his former notions»Dubois cita a Canseliet escribiendo a Schwaller sobre el andrógino primitivo y anotando que las mismas preocupaciones tomaron a Champagne al volver de Plan-de-Grasse: la carta del discípulo enlaza por sí sola las dos casas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«Eugène Canseliet was certainly not party to the work carried out by Pierre Dujols and Julien Champagne on the notes that were to give birth to Le Mystères des Cathédrales any more than he was aware of the association of Dujols and Champagne in the preparation of the future Demeures Philosophales.»Dubois excluye a Canseliet del trabajo de Dujols y Champagne sobre las notas de los dos libros, y lo afirma sin reserva —*certainly not*—; la grafía *Le Mystères* es la que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«He was also unaware of the laboratory work on the blues and reds of Chartres’s stained glass. Gaston Devaux, J.-J. Champagne’s brother-in-law, who acted as a forwarding address for Champagne, further deepened the mystery.»Dubois añade el desconocimiento de Canseliet sobre el trabajo de los vidrios y adjudica a Devaux, con su domicilio pantalla, haber espesado el misterio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«After the death of the alchemist in 1932, Eugène Canseliet continued to maintain connections with the Devaux family, visiting them in the département of the Somme, and subsequently invited the family to his home.»Dubois consigna que el trato entre Canseliet y los Devaux siguió después de morir Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«This legendary history detracts neither from the interest the protagonists have for the science of the philosophers nor from their contribution to the understanding of the texts of the ancients.»Dubois acota expresamente el alcance de su libro: mostrar que la historia es legendaria no quita valor ni al interés de sus protagonistas por la ciencia de los filósofos ni a lo que aportaron para entender los textos antiguos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«We are simply reminded of the article of Giovanni Sciuto that appeared in the journal L’Autre Monde, special issue on alchemy (1987), which attempts to prove that Nicolas Flamel was not an adept and that “having entered into legend, he is in the process of getting himself out of it.”»Dubois trae el caso de Nicolas Flamel como precedente, por el artículo de Giovanni Sciuto de 1987 que niega su condición de adepto y describe su salida de la leyenda.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 71»

«Halleux, from Belgium, a specialist in the history of alchemy, Nicolas Flamel certainly existed and was wealthy enough to perform charitable works, but his personality as an adept was established a century later in the 1700sb in order to give a new appeal to this science, which was in decline.»Dubois adjudica al historiador de la ciencia Robert Halleux la distinción entre el Flamel real, acaudalado y limosnero, y el Flamel adepto, construido un siglo después para dar atractivo nuevo a una ciencia en declive: el mismo mecanismo que atribuye al caso Fulcanelli. El tramo arranca con el apellido partido por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 71.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«In this regard it was an anonymous alchemical author who was to have created the legend.»Dubois atribuye a un alquimista anónimo la creación de la leyenda de Flamel, en condicional.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«As for the book called Livre des lavures, attributed to Flamel, its style is not that of the fourteenth century but rather that of the time of the Renaissance.»Dubois objeta la atribución del *Livre des lavures* a Flamel por el estilo, que data en el Renacimiento y no en el siglo XIV: la crítica de estilo es el mismo instrumento con que trata los libros de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«We are now going to broach a few points in the assertions of Eugène Canseliet that have seemed suspicious and which have to do with the extraordinary story of the survival of Fulcanelli as an adept in a “parallel” world, through recountings that took place over many years.»Dubois anuncia la sección donde examina lo que llama sospechoso en las afirmaciones de Canseliet sobre la supervivencia de Fulcanelli en un mundo paralelo, y trata esos relatos como serie de versiones sucesivas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«In 1953, in his book L’Occultisme à Paris, Pierre Geyraud (alias Abbé Guyades, vicar of Saint-Séverin) narrates that in 1936, during a banquet attended by a glittering array of society figures on the occasion of the feast of the sun and the festival of lights of St. John, Eugène Canseliet replied to a question of Mr. Rosny concerning the identity of Fulcanelli:»Dubois data en un banquete de 1936, referido por Pierre Geyraud en 1953, la primera de esas versiones, y da la identidad civil que Geyraud llevaba tras el seudónimo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«Fulcanelli is the pseudonym of [an] individual about whom, out of respect for the hermetic rule of silence, I cannot speak in any other way. This Fulcanelli is still alive. He is mandated by the White Brotherhood to assist in the evolution of humanity. This is a true Rosy-Cross. He is sometimes in Brazil, sometimes in Argentina, wandering through the world in the manner of the Rosy-Cross of olden times. Right now he is in the south of France. He is a master with amazing powers.”»[Canseliet en 1936, según Geyraud, transcrito por Dubois] declara vivo a Fulcanelli, mandatado por la Hermandad Blanca, verdadero rosacruz errante entre Brasil, Argentina y el mediodía francés, y se acoge a la regla hermética del silencio para no decir más.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«This story highlights the belief of Canseliet in the alchemical mythology: the mandated adept, longevity, powers, and so on.»Dubois lee ese relato como muestra de la creencia de Canseliet en la mitología alquímica y enumera sus piezas: adepto mandatado, longevidad, poderes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«In 1972, in the Charivari devoted to alchemy, there appears the “Seville Story” from the pen of François Jacquemart:»Dubois data en 1972 la versión sevillana del reencuentro, firmada por François Jacquemart en *Charivari*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«In 1952, a female acquaintance of Eugène Canseliet came to Canseliet’s home and asked him to follow her without specifying the destination, but letting him know that it was a matter of some importance.»[versión de Jacquemart, transcrita por Dubois] el viaje empieza en 1952 con una conocida que va a buscar a Canseliet sin decirle adónde.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«The trip came to an end not far from Seville, at a rambling estate where a terrace and a double set of stairs led to a stately home.»[versión de Jacquemart] el destino es una finca cerca de Sevilla, descrita por su terraza y su doble escalera.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«Upon his arrival, Fulcanelli (remember that he was born in 1840) was there and asked Canseliet: “Do you recognize me?”»[versión de Jacquemart] Fulcanelli recibe a Canseliet con una pregunta; el paréntesis con el año de nacimiento es de Dubois, y da 1840 donde la plana 55 daba 1839.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«Eugène Canseliet assented. The two men engaged in a brief exchange. For the remainder of the stay, they met only for short moments. Eugène Canseliet was working in what he heard called “the small laboratory.”»[versión de Jacquemart] el encuentro se reduce a un intercambio breve y a ratos sueltos, con Canseliet trabajando en lo que oía llamar el laboratorio pequeño.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«Early one morning, in one of the walkways of the park after one of the long nights of labors in which he had been compelled to engage, he saw a strange scene: a young queen wearing the Golden Fleece was moving forward, followed by a duenna. Seeing him, she nodded.»[versión de Jacquemart] la escena de la reina joven con el Toisón de Oro y su dueña en el parque, tras una noche de trabajo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«On another occasion, he came upon two children, a little boy and a little girl, playing with two rabbits and a pony. From their clothing and their appearance they seemed to have stepped out of a Velázquez painting.»[versión de Jacquemart] la segunda aparición, dos niños con conejos y un poni, salidos al parecer de un cuadro de Velázquez.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«On these two occasions, Eugène Canseliet had the intuition of a humanity that was not living on the same plane as ours, a society beyond time»[versión de Jacquemart] la conclusión que Canseliet saca de esas dos escenas: una humanidad en otro plano, una sociedad fuera del tiempo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 72»

«In his 1969 book, Invitation au château de l’étrange—témoignages inédits (Invitation to the Chateau of the Strange—Unpublished Accounts), Claude Seignolle recounts a story that took place in 1966 and in which the central figure is Eugène Canseliet.»Dubois data en 1969 el libro de Claude Seignolle con una tercera versión, situada en 1966 y con Canseliet por protagonista.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«There is no mention of Fulcanelli in this account, nor of Seville, but only of a strange family who fascinated Canseliet for their alchemical knowledge and the impression they gave of living as though “stuck in the seventeenth century.”»Dubois señala lo que falta en esa versión —ni Fulcanelli ni Sevilla, solo una familia detenida en el siglo XVII—, y esa comparación entre versiones es el instrumento con que trata el relato del reencuentro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«In revealing this confidential adventure, I am going to betray the trust of a friend and his two daughters with whom I have for a long time established a substantial exchange of affection.»[Seignolle, transcrito por Dubois] el narrador abre declarando que traiciona la confianza de un amigo y de sus dos hijas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«[He is] a simple man, modest and, it goes without saying, sincere. His knowledge is vast and authentic.»[Seignolle] describe a ese amigo como hombre sencillo y sincero de saber vasto y auténtico; el corchete inicial es del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«Of course, I will remain silent as to his name, famous and respected as he is in esoteric circles, but I bow in advance before his reproach, in case these lines should fall before his eyes.»[Seignolle] calla el nombre del amigo, célebre y respetado en los círculos esotéricos: la anonimia del relato es lo que permite a Dubois cotejarlo con las otras versiones sin que el propio texto lo diga.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«Every day he receives a ministerial volume of post and engages in fascinating exchanges of correspondence, among them with a wealthy Spanish family who are said to be withdrawn from time and who write in a marvelously textured antique French—a joy for my friend, who readily uses the imperfect subjunctive, even with his grocer.»[Seignolle] retrata la correspondencia de ese amigo con una familia española acaudalada, de la que dice que se tiene por retirada del tiempo y que escribe en francés antiguo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«Two or three years ago, this Spanish family sent him a plane ticket to Madrid, inviting him to spend a few days with them so they would come to know him better, while, for their part, they would endeavor to learn more from him about his specialty»[Seignolle] la familia española manda un billete de avión a Madrid para conocerlo y aprender de su especialidad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 73»

«At the Madrid airport an old Spanish woman was waiting for him with a chauffeur, who was more like a coachman than an automobile driver, decked out in antique style and looking as though he might well be found in the corner of a Goya painting.»[Seignolle] el recibimiento en Madrid, con una anciana y un cochero vestido a la antigua; el narrador lo compara con un cuadro de Goya, donde la versión sevillana ponía a Velázquez.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«In coming into the house, my friend noticed that there was no electricity. Not one lightbulb. Here only candles were used for lighting.»[Seignolle] la casa sin electricidad, alumbrada solo con velas: el mismo rasgo que Dubois atribuye a Champagne en la plana 55.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«His hosts were there, wearing traditional vestments, which, far from finding grotesque, he enjoyed immensely.»[Seignolle] los anfitriones vestidos a la antigua, sin que el visitante los encuentre ridículos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«My friend quickly noticed, as he had in their letters, that his hosts, although they might have been hesitant about present-day alchemy, had, on the contrary, very profound knowledge of ancient alchemy, which they spoke of naturally, as if it was something that they made use of every day.»[Seignolle] el saber de esa familia se acota con precisión: reticentes ante la alquimia de hoy y hondos en la antigua, de la que hablaban como de cosa de uso diario.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«This was true to such an extent that my friend—he who knows all knowledge —learned, with amazement, of the existence of unknown books and the wording of forgotten formulas, finding in these people the lost strength of ancient alchemy.»[Seignolle] el visitante, dice, supo por ellos de libros desconocidos y de fórmulas olvidadas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«Who then were these individuals living in 1966 but having not ventured past the life of the seventeenth century? He was very careful not to ask them.»[Seignolle] el narrador deja la pregunta por la identidad de los anfitriones sin respuesta y anota que el visitante se cuidó de hacerla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«His sojourn there lasted a week, and not only did he learn a great deal, but he underwent a beneficial rest cure.»[Seignolle] la estancia dura una semana y se cierra en clave de reposo, no de iniciación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«He saw planes pass by overhead but did not hear the slightest hum, and on the nearby road, cars came and went in silence as if the present moment was nothing more than a vision of the mind.»[Seignolle] los aviones y los coches pasan sin ruido, con lo que el relato pone al presente en suspenso sin decir que el lugar esté fuera del tiempo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«Around him there were no other sounds except those of an affable and peaceful family who each day seemed tirelessly to resume their patient gestures and, devoid of any agitation, to speak of a life that had no end.»[Seignolle] el relato cierra con la familia hablando de una vida sin fin: la longevidad aparece aquí como tema de conversación y no como atributo de un adepto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 74»

«with Eugène Canseliet: It was near Seville. I was walking like a king. Everything I needed was there, but I always came back to my lodging, and I left again early in the morning.»[Canseliet en el *Feu du Soleil* de Robert Amadou, transcrito por Dubois] describe la estancia cerca de Sevilla; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana y empieza en la 74 con *In 1978, Robert Amadou’s Feu du Soleil was published. In it there is this conversation*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«In the garden there were apples and lemons. A freshwater stream flowed nearby. It was magnificent! Now I did not expect to meet Fulcanelli, with my suspenders tumbling down my trousers. When he saw me, he addressed me familiarly, as he was accustomed to do: “So, do you recognize me?”»[Canseliet en el *Feu du Soleil*] cuenta el encuentro con Fulcanelli en el jardín y repite la pregunta con que lo recibió, la misma que trae la versión de Jacquemart.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«And on the previous page: “He is no longer there; he is on the earth, but it is a terrestrial paradise. What is he doing now? I saw nothing. I saw him when I arrived, when he greeted me wearing a suit.”»[Canseliet en el *Feu du Soleil*] sitúa a Fulcanelli en un paraíso terrestre y admite lo poco que llegó a ver; la fórmula *And on the previous page* es de Dubois, que va cosiendo pasajes sueltos del mismo libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«Finally: “And in the manor where I saw Fulcanelli, there were contemporaries of Philip II. Right away, I understood nothing. It was not forbidden to look out the windows, and I saw a very beautiful staircase with a number of landings, and children playing. . . . There were also many young women who looked as if they had stepped out of a Velázquez painting, with the collar of the Golden Fleece.”»[Canseliet en el *Feu du Soleil*] describe la casa poblada de contemporáneos de Felipe II, con niños jugando y mujeres como salidas de un Velázquez, con el collar del Toisón: los mismos motivos de la versión sevillana de 1972.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«In 1979, in the meeting between Jacques Pradel and Eugène Canseliet on France-Inter, the same story turns up again, but the apparent age of Fulcanelli is specified: from his looks, about fifty, although he should have been 113.»Dubois data en 1979 la versión radiofónica del mismo relato en France-Inter y anota lo que esa versión añade: la edad aparente de Fulcanelli, cincuenta años frente a los ciento trece que le tocaban.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«That year, a car stopped in front of the house of Eugène Canseliet near Beauvais. In this car, there was an emissary from Fulcanelli. Someone showed Eugène Canseliet papers that proved Fulcanelli was alive. Eugène Canseliet was going to find himself in Spain, in a mysterious chateau near Seville, he thinks. . . . There are people on the earth who are living on a different plane than ours, that is certain.”»[versión de France-Inter, 1979, transcrita por Dubois] el emisario que llega en coche a casa de Canseliet con papeles que probarían que Fulcanelli vive; el propio relato conserva su vacilación, *he thinks*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«Finally, in The Fulcanelli Phenomenon, by Kenneth Rayner Johnson, Canseliet recounts that one morning, in his bedroom of the little tower that he was occupying, he moved near to the window and saw a group of three women who seemed to be dressed in the style of the sixteenth century. He was about to go back to his room when one of the women turned toward him and began to laugh. He was stunned, for the face of the “woman” who was laughing as she looked at him was that of Fulcanelli.»[versión de Kenneth Rayner Johnson, transcrita por Dubois] la cuarta versión añade una escena que no está en las otras: la mujer que se ríe y que tiene el rostro de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«In this book, the voyage to Spain is dated 1954, in contrast to what Eugène Canseliet states in Feu du Soleil, which gives the date as 1952.»Dubois pone una junto a otra las dos fechas del viaje a España, 1954 en Rayner Johnson y 1952 en el *Feu du Soleil*, y deja la discrepancia sin resolver.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«Also according to Rayner Johnson, someone had been able to see in Eugène Canseliet’s passport an entry visa to Spanish territory for the year 1954.»Dubois añade el visado de entrada de 1954 que alguien habría visto en el pasaporte de Canseliet, adjudicado también a Rayner Johnson: el único apoyo documental que las versiones ofrecen, y de tercera mano.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«After hearing these accounts, we can say that it is possible that Eugène Canseliet is relating a paranormal experience.»Dubois enuncia su lectura de esos relatos en el grado más débil posible: es posible que Canseliet estuviera contando una experiencia paranormal. No los niega ni los suscribe.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«This may remind the reader of the story of the “Fantômes de Trianon,”⁵ in which two Englishwomen visited Versailles at the beginning of the twentieth century and found themselves plunged into the middle of the eighteenth century. They met courtesans who spoke to them and were able even to see Marie-Antoinette.»Dubois compara los relatos de Canseliet con el caso de los Fantasmas del Trianón, dos inglesas que en Versalles se habrían visto en pleno siglo XVIII: el paralelo cambia el marco de la discusión del engaño a la experiencia anómala.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 75»

«attributed to Fulcanelli that has led to much commentary: “The Cyclic Cross of Hendaye.” Mr. Canseliet makes no mention of the article that appeared in 1936 in Consolation, the journal directed by Maryse Choisy (see figs. 6.3, 6.4, 6.5) and signed Jules Boucher (J. B.).»Dubois señala un silencio de Canseliet: no menciona el artículo sobre la cruz de Hendaya que Jules Boucher firmó en *Consolation* en 1936. El tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 75.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 76»

«In this article we find virtually all theories about the famous inscription OCRUXAVES PESUNIC A.»Dubois adjudica a ese artículo de 1936 casi todas las teorías sobre la inscripción de la cruz, que es el asunto del capítulo más comentado de *Le Mystère*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 76»

«Robert Ambelain entrusted us with the rather shocking unfolding of this discovery. As it happened, on vacation with his lady friend in Hendaye, the painter Lemoine took a photograph of the monument, seeing in it a “teaching.”»Dubois atribuye a Robert Ambelain el relato del origen del artículo: unas vacaciones del pintor Lemoine en Hendaya y una fotografía en la que creyó ver una enseñanza.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«He submitted a print of it to Maryse Choisy, who, on the lookout for articles for her weekly, asked Jules Boucher to write something about this “esoteric” cross.»[Ambelain, según Dubois] la foto llega a Maryse Choisy, que necesitaba material para su semanario y encarga el texto a Boucher.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«Boucher told Robert Ambelain that he was not much interested in the subject but didn’t know how to get out of doing it. He did his best and the article appeared in 1936.»[Ambelain, según Dubois] Boucher escribió aquel artículo sin interés por el asunto y por no saber negarse: el origen de la doctrina de la cruz cíclica queda así en un encargo periodístico.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«As for the sundial of Holyrood (fig. 6.6), which was the subject of a chapter in Les Demeures Philosophales, some are quick to see it as proof that Fulcanelli belonged to an aristocratic milieu.»Dubois presenta el reloj de sol de Holyrood, capítulo de *Les Demeures*, y el argumento que algunos sacan de él sobre la cuna aristocrática de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«It seems clear that René Schwaller, who was a member of the Theosophical Society, communicated a drawing or a photograph like this to Jean-Julien Champagne with the assistance of the theosophist Lady Caithness.»Dubois propone en su lugar una vía documental —un dibujo o una fotografía que Schwaller haría llegar a Champagne por medio de Lady Caithness— y conserva el grado: *it seems clear*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«In her mansion on the avenue Wagram, Lady Caithness gathered the whole esoteric milieu of her time. She had been behind the founding of the Gnostic Church and was the representative in France of the Theosophical Society.»Dubois sitúa a Lady Caithness en el centro del medio esotérico parisino, tras la fundación de la Iglesia Gnóstica y al frente de la Sociedad Teosófica en Francia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«Her husband was Lord James Barogill, the fourteenth count of Caithness, who was head of the Sinclair clan. He was buried in the former royal chapel of Mary Stuart at Holyrood.»Dubois enlaza a Lady Caithness con Holyrood por la sepultura de su marido en la antigua capilla real.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«Lady Caithness was very much a part of fashionable English society and was obsessively devoted to Mary Stuart, believing herself to be Mary’s reincarnation, for in the abbey of Holyrood she had had an experience with the dead queen.»Dubois completa el enlace con la devoción de Lady Caithness por María Estuardo, de quien se creía reencarnación tras una experiencia en la abadía: la vía por la que una imagen de un jardín privado inglés pudo llegar a París.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«Today it is not possible to gain access to this monument, which is found in the private gardens of the royal family of England.»Dubois anota que el monumento está hoy en jardines privados de la familia real inglesa y no es accesible, lo que explica que la vía de la imagen importe.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 78»

«des sciences” (Paradox of the Unlimited Progress of Science, missing from the first edition) is about the incineration of the planet.»Dubois señala que el capítulo del paradójico progreso ilimitado de las ciencias, que trata de la incineración del planeta, falta en la primera edición de *Les Demeures*: el volumen que se lee hoy creció después de muerto Champagne. El tramo arranca a media palabra por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 78.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«To support his ideas about this, the author mentions a church at Melle, in the département of Deux-Sèvres, the porch of which is ornamented with an equestrian statue referred to as the Horseman of the Apocalypse.»Dubois expone el argumento de ese capítulo, apoyado en la estatua ecuestre del pórtico de una iglesia de Melle llamada el Caballero del Apocalipsis.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«Those who are curious and want to admire this sculpture can go to this charming town, where they would first of all find that the horseman is not in the entrance of the church of Saint-Pierre but instead in the church of Saint-Hilaire.»Dubois objeta el dato yendo al sitio: el caballero no está en Saint-Pierre sino en Saint-Hilaire.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«Next they would notice that this handsome figure is over the side door of the church’s north side and not its south side, as the author contends.»Dubois añade la segunda enmienda: la figura está en la puerta lateral del lado norte y no del sur.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«Yet the text bases the point of its hypothesis concerning the mysterious horseman on just this southerly orientation: “It is a serious and noble statue that, in the gallery of a semicircular arch of the church of Saint-Pierre, rears up over the southern entrance, always subjected to the radiance of the sun due to this orientation.”»Dubois muestra por qué esas dos enmiendas importan: la hipótesis del texto descansa justamente en la orientación al sur, y transcribe el pasaje que la enuncia. La verificación in situ es el instrumento más fuerte que emplea en todo el libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«We shall finish with the book by Atorène, Le Laboratoire alchimique, in which there is mention of the rue Dieudé in Marseilles, where Fulcanelli is supposed to have stayed in 1915.»Dubois pasa al *Laboratoire alchimique* de Atorène y a la estancia de Fulcanelli en la rue Dieudé de Marsella en 1915, que ese libro da por hecha.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«Figure 6.7 (pages 119–120) shows the list of those who lived on the rue Dieudé.»Dubois responde a esa afirmación con un documento, el padrón de habitantes de la calle, y deja al lector el cotejo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«Fig. 6.7. Address directory by street for Marseilles, dating from 1915. All the inhabitants of the rue Dieudé are listed.»[pie de lámina] la fig. 6.7 reproduce el callejero de Marsella de 1915 con todos los vecinos de la rue Dieudé: el pie declara la fecha y la exhaustividad de la lista, que es lo que la hace valer como prueba negativa.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 80»

«As it turns out, the archivist Isabelle Bonnot looked for evidence of a possible trip of Eugène Canseliet to the Fine Arts Museum of Marseilles and found nothing.»Dubois cierra el capítulo con una búsqueda negativa firmada: la archivista Isabelle Bonnot no halló rastro de un viaje de Canseliet al museo de Bellas Artes de Marsella. La negativa se consigna como hallazgo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 79»

«Appendix A CHRONOLOGY OF THE ALCHEMICAL REVIVAL 1786 Birth of the chemist Chevreul, whose hobby was writing alchemical books»Dubois abre su cronología del renacimiento alquímico en 1786, con el nacimiento del químico Chevreul, de quien anota que escribía libros de alquimia por afición: la serie empieza por la figura que en la plana 11 aparece como crítico de Cambriel y coleccionista de manuscritos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 81»

«1828 Birth of Grasset d’Orcet, philologist and archaeologist, at Cusset; death of Louis-François de Bourbon Cusset, born in 1748 at Cusset»Dubois data en 1828 el nacimiento de Grasset d’Orcet en Cusset y lo hace coincidir con la muerte, en la misma villa, de un Borbón.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 81»

«1830 Beginning of Auguste Comte’s positivist philosophy (from 1830 to 1842) 1831 Birth of Héléna Blavatsky; publication of Notre-Dame-de-Paris by Victor Hugo 1832 Publication of Hermès Dévoilé by Cyliani»Dubois alinea en tres años el positivismo de Comte, el nacimiento de Blavatsky con la novela de Hugo, y el *Hermès Dévoilé*, que la cronología adjudica sin más a Cyliani pese a la discusión de la plana 29.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 81»

«1842 Birth of Saint-Yves-d’Alveydre; Tiffereau succeeds in a transmutation in Mexico; birth of Jules Doinel»Dubois consigna en 1842 la transmutación lograda por Tiffereau en México, y la enuncia sin reserva dentro de la cronología.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 82»

«1845 Beginning of Viollet-le-Duc’s restoration work on Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris; birth of Antoine Dujols de Valois at Saint-Illide, in the Cantal region»Dubois hace coincidir en 1845 la restauración de Notre-Dame y el nacimiento de Antoine Dujols de Valois.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 82»

«1857 Publication of Histoire de la France Allevysée by Allévy 1859 Birth of Péladan»Dubois data en 1857 el opúsculo de Allévy; la grafía *Allevysée* difiere aquí de la que da la plana 36.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 82»

«1862 Birth of Pierre Dujols de Valois at Saint-Illide, in the Cantal region 1865 Birth of Papus (Gérard Encausse)»Dubois data el nacimiento de Dujols en 1862 y el de Papus en 1865.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 82»

«1877 Birth of Jean-Julien Champagne at Levallois-Perret; birth of Raymond Roussel and O. V. de Lubicz Milosz»Dubois reúne en 1877 los nacimientos de Champagne, de Raymond Roussel y de Milosz: los tres nombres del capítulo 5 caben en un renglón.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 83»

«1886 Birth of René Guénon 1887 Birth of René Schwaller at Asnières 1888 Birth of Alexandre Rouhier at Lyons»Dubois data en tres años seguidos los nacimientos de Guénon, de Schwaller y de Rouhier.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 83»

«1892 Death of Antoine Dujols de Valois, at age forty-seven 1893 Death of Albert Poisson»Dubois data en 1892 la muerte del hermano de Dujols; la edad que da aquí, cuarenta y siete, no coincide con los cuarenta y seis de la plana 29, y las dos quedan como las imprime el volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 83»

«1905 Successful transmutation in Paris by Dr. Alphonse Jobert 1907 Death of Marcellin Berthelot»Dubois consigna en 1905 una transmutación lograda en París por el doctor Alphonse Jobert, nombre que no aparece en el cuerpo del libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 84»

«1914 Publication of Mutus Liber and Hypotypose by Magophon (Pierre Dujols) 1915 Death of Abbé Henri Boudet, born in 1837, author of La Vraie Langue Celtique»Dubois data en 1914 el *Mutus Liber* de Magophon y en 1915 la muerte del abate Boudet; el título de este sale aquí como *La Vraie Langue Celtique*, frente al *Véritable* de la plana 38.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 84»

«1917 Death of Abbé Saunière, born in 1852, who was the curé at Rennes-le-Château 1918 Death of Joséphin Péladan 1919 Publication of Voyages en Kaléidoscope by Irène Hillel-Erlanger»Dubois da las fechas del abate Saunière y data en 1919 los *Voyages en Kaléidoscope*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 84»

«1926 Publication of Le Mystère des Cathédrales, signed by Fulcanelli; death of Pierre Dujols de Valois (in April), at age sixty-four; death of Sédir and of Marc Haven»Dubois reúne en el renglón de 1926 la aparición del libro firmado y la muerte de Dujols en abril: la coincidencia que su capítulo 5 convierte en argumento aparece aquí como simple entrada de cronología.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 85»

«1930 Publication of Les Demeures Philosophales, signed by Fulcanelli 1932 Death of Jean-Julien Champagne (in August), at age fifty-five 1933 Death of Raymond Roussel»Dubois data en 1930 *Les Demeures* y en 1932 la muerte de Champagne, y en las dos entradas escribe que los libros van firmados por Fulcanelli, sin adjudicarlos en la cronología.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 85»

«1947 Death of Lucien Faugeron, disciple of Pierre Dujols 1950 Death of Paul Vulliaud 1951 Death of René Guénon»Dubois data las muertes de Faugeron, de Vulliaud y de Guénon entre 1947 y 1951.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 85»

«1961 Death of René Schwaller de Lubicz, at age seventy-four 1968 Death of Alexandre Rouhier at Bourron 1977 Death of Savoret 1982 Death of Eugène Canseliet, at age eighty-three»Dubois cierra la cronología en 1982 con la muerte de Canseliet, último superviviente del grupo: la serie que abrió en 1786 con Chevreul termina con el guardián del mito.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 86»

«Appendix B CHRONOLOGY OF COMMANDER LEVET; LETTER FROM LEVET TO PAPUS Chronology of Commander Levet June 5, 1850 Levet is born at Annecy (département of Haute-Savoie) as François-Joseph-Aimé-Eugène Levet, son of Antoine-Aimé Levet, director of the Annecy branch of the Banque de France, and Caroline-Albertine Chauvin.»Dubois abre el apéndice B con la partida de nacimiento del comandante Levet en Annecy el 5 de junio de 1850, con los nombres de sus padres y el cargo del padre en el Banco de Francia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 87»

«1870 He is appointed to an engineering post on leaving the École Polytechnique. 1877 He becomes captain of the 4th Regiment of Engineers, Grenoble.»[cronología de Levet] la salida de la Politécnica en 1870 y la capitanía de ingenieros en Grenoble en 1877.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 87»

«1897 He is appointed head of engineering at Constantine, in Algeria. 1904 He is appointed head of engineering at Nice, where he begins retirement on October 26. He instructs that his pension be delivered to him in Paris at 19 boulevard Morland (4th arrondissement).»[cronología de Levet] el destino en Constantina en 1897 y el retiro en Niza en 1904, con la dirección parisina donde pidió cobrar la pensión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 87»

«September 27, 1914 He dies at Bergerac (département of Dordogne), at age sixty-three.»[cronología de Levet] la muerte en Bergerac el 27 de septiembre de 1914; la cronología del apéndice A la databa en 1911, y las dos fechas quedan como las imprime el volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 87»

«Letter from Commander Levet to Papus (Municipal Library of Lyons; call number 5487; Papus Collection)»Dubois declara la procedencia archivística de la carta que sigue: fondo Papus de la Biblioteca Municipal de Lyon, con signatura. Es de las pocas piezas del volumen con referencia de archivo completa.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 87»

«In a previous letter you conferred upon me the honor of considering me as S I in spite of the inadequacy of my qualifications.»[Levet a Papus, 1897] el remitente agradece un grado que dice no merecer; las siglas sueltas son las abreviaturas martinistas que imprime la fuente, sin sus puntos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 87»

«I see in the proceedings that you have published (Initiation, March 1897) that the general representative in Egypt succeeded in concluding an agreement with the Baha’is of Persia.»[Levet a Papus] cita las actas publicadas en *Initiation* de marzo de 1897 sobre un acuerdo del representante martinista en Egipto con los bahaíes de Persia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«By means of the hieroglyphics, I understand this order to be an Ionian faction of Islam.»[Levet a Papus] clasifica a esa orden como facción jonia del islam, y dice llegar a ello por los jeroglíficos: la misma clave de lectura de Grasset d’Orcet, con quien mantenía la correspondencia que menciona la plana 33.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«I believe it would be easier and even more advantageous to put the Martinist Order in contact with the Tidjanya and with the Quadrya.»[Levet a Papus] propone en su lugar poner a la Orden Martinista en contacto con las cofradías tiyaní y cadirí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«The administration of indigenous affairs in Algeria considers the Tidjanya as devoted friends of the French influence. They seem to have a special veneration for Sidi Aïssa (Jesus) and, like the Albanian Baktachi, can be favorable to Christians.»[Levet a Papus] recomienda a los tiyaníes por lo que de ellos dice la administración colonial de asuntos indígenas y por su veneración a Sidi Aïssa; el pasaje deja ver el cálculo político dentro de la propuesta esotérica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«Henri Duveyrier, the explorer of the Algerian Sahara, was a khouan [adherent] of their order. Recently as well Mr. de Brazza made the trip from Laghouat to take from there the ward (the rose).»[Levet a Papus] cuenta entre los afiliados a la cofradía al explorador Henri Duveyrier; el corchete que traduce *khouan* es del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«Their grand master resides at Tlemcen, near Touggourt, and our division chief never makes the trip without going to see him.»[Levet a Papus] localiza al gran maestre tiyaní en Tlemcen y anota que el jefe de división francés lo visitaba siempre.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«I have good reason to believe that the Quadrya would also be very accessible. They are a much more powerful order, much more widespread than the Tidjanya, who are mostly Algerian (Algerian provinces, from Constantine and Tunisia).»[Levet a Papus] tiene a los cadiríes por más accesibles y por orden mucho más extendida que la tiyaní, que da por sobre todo argelina.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«The Quadrya have their center at Baghdad near the tomb of their patron, Sidi ’Abd al-Qadir Jilani, perhaps the greatest saint of Islam and certainly the best known (almost all the poor beg alms in his name). The emir ’Abd al-Qadir belongs to them.»[Levet a Papus] sitúa el centro cadirí en Bagdad junto a la tumba de Abd al-Qadir al-Yilani, a quien llama quizá el mayor santo del islam, y adscribe a la orden al emir Abd el-Kader.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«I believe them to be Dorian, however. In contrast, the brotherhoods originating from Morocco all seem to me to be Ionian and hostile.»[Levet a Papus] clasifica a las cofradías por el par dorio/jonio que toma de la clave de Grasset d’Orcet, y hace hostiles a las de origen marroquí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«However it may be, I remain at your disposal for any initiative that might be useful to the order, and I beg you to count on my complete support. Constantine, May 30, 1897 Commander Levet, Head of Engineering at Constantine»[Levet a Papus] cierra ofreciéndose a la orden y firma en Constantina el 30 de mayo de 1897 con su cargo militar.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«The Moslem brotherhoods have very curious and very interesting prophecies. One of them from the end of the eighteenth century predicted very clearly the conquest of Algeria by the French. I will communicate that to Saturninus.»[Levet a Papus, posdata] atribuye a las cofradías una profecía dieciochesca sobre la conquista francesa de Argelia y anuncia que se la pasará a Saturninus.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 88»

«Appendix C CHRONOLOGY OF RENÉ SCHWALLER DE LUBICZ December 30, 1887 He is born at Asnières in the département of Seine-et-Oise. He spends his childhood and his adolescence in Strasbourg, where his father is a pharmacist-chemist. His father, originally from Switzerland, studied pharmacy in Germany.»Dubois abre la cronología de Schwaller con su nacimiento en Asnières el 30 de diciembre de 1887 y con el oficio del padre, farmacéutico y químico en Estrasburgo: el laboratorio está en la casa desde el principio.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 89»

«1910 He arrives in Paris and becomes the student of Matisse. It is here that he meets a very beautiful young woman whom he marries and with whom he has a son. She looks after his painter’s studio for him. He comes in contact with the occult milieu of Paris and in particular with the hermetic circle developing around Jean-Julien Champagne. A meeting with Champagne turns into a twenty-year collaboration.»[cronología de Schwaller] la llegada a París en 1910 y el encuentro con Champagne, que la entrada cifra en veinte años de colaboración: la cronología afirma como dato la relación que el cuerpo del libro tuvo que reconstruir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 89»

«1914–18 He is mobilized and assigned to an army laboratory, where he is responsible for carrying out chemical analyses on the feeding of troops. He is already interested in theories about the constitution of matter.»[cronología de Schwaller] la movilización al laboratorio militar de análisis de la alimentación de la tropa y su interés ya declarado por la constitución de la materia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 89»

«1919 The Lithuanian poet Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz confers on him the right to bear the coat of arms of Lubicz. 1920 He creates the association Les Veilleurs and a journal, Le Veilleur.»[cronología de Schwaller] el escudo de Lubicz en 1919 y Les Veilleurs con su revista en 1920; el cuerpo del libro databa el movimiento en 1919, y las dos fechas quedan como las imprime el volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 89»

«1922 He departs for Suhalia in Switzerland, where, with the help of a few faithful friends, he founds a scientific research station.»[cronología de Schwaller] la marcha a Suhalia en 1922, aquí llamada estación de investigación científica y no monasterio iniciático.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 89»

«1927 He marries Jeanne Germain, born in 1885 and the widow of Georges Lamy, better known by the mystic name Isha, who participates in all his researches. Prior to her marriage to Schwaller, she bore four children, two daughters and two sons. Tragically, she lost her eldest daughter and her youngest son, Jacques. Her second daughter, Lucie Lamy, becomes the staunch collaborator of Aor, and her son, Jean Lamy, becomes a valued doctor.»[cronología de Schwaller] el matrimonio con Isha en 1927 y la composición de esa familia, con los dos hijos muertos y con Lucie y Jean Lamy, que son los testigos del capítulo 5.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 89»

«He purchases the dwelling Les Platanes in Plan-de-Grasse, to which Isha assigns the name Lou-Mas-de-Coucagno. He begins experiments on stained glass with J.-J. Champagne.»[cronología de Schwaller] la compra de Les Platanes en 1929, rebautizada por Isha, y el comienzo allí de los experimentos con el vidrio junto a Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 90»

«1930 Champagne and Schwaller find success in these experiments, which Aor relates to Mr. VandenBroeck and which appear in his book, Al-Kemi, a Memoir: Hermetic, Occult, Political, and Private Aspects of R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz.»[cronología de Schwaller] la entrada de 1930 da los experimentos por logrados y remite, para todo el asunto, al *Al-Kemi* de VandenBroeck.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 90»

«1931–32 The final meetings occur between J.-J. Champagne and R. Schwaller. Champagne dies in Paris on August 26, 1932.»[cronología de Schwaller] los últimos encuentros y la muerte de Champagne el 26 de agosto de 1932.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 90»

«1938 The Schwaller family settle in Egypt, where they remain for fifteen years, fourteen of which are spent in Luxor. The painter Alexandre Stoppelaere, the architect-archaeologist Clément Robichon, and the archaeologist Alexandre Varille join in Schwaller’s research. Together they form the Groupe de Luxor. (In 1937 in Paris, the publisher Paul Harmann had published En Égypte by Varille and Robichon.)»[cronología de Schwaller] la instalación en Egipto en 1938 y el Groupe de Luxor con Stoppelaere, Robichon y Varille.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 90»

«1952 Schwaller returns to Plan-de-Grasse and publishes many books. 1961 On December 7, René Schwaller dies at Plan-de-Grasse. 1962 In December, Jeanne Schwaller dies in Paris.»[cronología de Schwaller] el regreso en 1952 y las dos muertes, la suya en 1961 y la de Isha en diciembre de 1962.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 90»

«Appendix D LETTER FROM RENÉ SCHWALLER TO UNKNOWN RECIPIENT What follows is a typed version of the manuscript draft of a letter from Aor dated 1960.»Dubois declara la naturaleza del documento del apéndice D: versión mecanografiada de un borrador manuscrito de carta de Schwaller, fechado en 1960, sin destinatario conocido.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«Everything relating to my great brother Milosz and his new orientation since 1917 concerns me and, when simple people are unaware of the causes, they make them up, and rarely are these imaginings favorable»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] señala que a falta de causas conocidas la gente las inventa, y que rara vez las invenciones favorecen: escribe eso en la carta que Dubois usa justamente para llenar ese hueco.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«Nowadays the atomic age has sprouted so-called alchemists in every direction. Alchemy is often spoken of without realizing that it is not a procedure for making gold, but rather is the echo of a very noble, priestly science bequeathed from antiquity, a science arising from Al-Kemit (pharaonic Egypt) and recorded everywhere, especially on the scrolls of Thot, whom the Greeks called Hermes—which, by the way, is a pharaonic word meaning “birth of Her,” or Kor, the Horus of the Romans.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] niega que la alquimia sea un procedimiento para hacer oro y la define como eco de una ciencia sacerdotal antigua venida de Al-Kemit, con una etimología egipcia propia del nombre de Hermes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«Certainly it was I who revealed to Milosz the deepest meaning that we must attribute to hermetic science. This radically changed his way of seeing the world, and God knows that at the time I had still much, definitely much, to learn.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] se atribuye por escrito y en primera persona la revelación del sentido de la ciencia hermética a Milosz, y añade cuánto le quedaba entonces por aprender.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«But the poet never feared getting carried away and he published Ars Magna, which I was never happy with.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] declara su desagrado con el *Ars Magna* que Milosz publicó: la queja por lo que otro hizo con sus ideas aparece aquí de su puño, sobre otro caso.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«If I may be permitted a piece of advice, do not let yourself be taken in by modern writings claiming to be alchemical; they can only lead you astray.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] advierte contra los escritos modernos que se dicen alquímicos, sin nombrar ninguno.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«As for Les Veilleurs, I am the chief culprit. In the beginning, in 1917, I had organized meetings the aim of which was solely to provide everyone an opportunity, in a small group, to develop a theme on any subject whatever.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] asume la responsabilidad de Les Veilleurs y data en 1917 unas reuniones cuyo fin, dice, era solo desarrollar un tema cualquiera en grupo pequeño.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«Right away the mystical took over and led us to meet only for mystical purposes—to the exclusion of any religious or political critique.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] cuenta que lo místico se impuso enseguida y excluyó toda crítica religiosa o política: su propia versión niega el carácter político que Pierre Mariel atribuía al grupo en la plana 49.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«When, at the end of the war, my old friend Gaston Revel, founder and editor in chief of the magazine Le Théosophe, offered to put this magazine at the service of our group, I proposed calling it Le Veilleur.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] se adjudica el nombre de la revista, cedida por Gaston Revel al acabar la guerra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 91»

«born—a movement about which people have spoken a great deal but have understood nothing—for one of our aims was to help demobilized craftsmen to find the opportunity to readjust to a new life guided by a sense that was mystic rather than one that was purely economic.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] declara mal entendido su movimiento y le atribuye un fin social concreto: reinsertar a los artesanos desmovilizados por un sentido místico y no económico. El tramo arranca a media palabra por el cambio de plana.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«Now all this had no connection whatsoever with the Theosophical Society to which I had belonged from 1913 to 1916. I am infinitely grateful to this movement for having opened my eyes to certain aspects of Buddhism, but later I had to follow my own path.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] separa Les Veilleurs de la Sociedad Teosófica, a la que dice haber pertenecido entre 1913 y 1916, y le agradece lo que le abrió del budismo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«I am familiar with the explanation of René Guénon about Les Veilleurs and about myself. He was mistaken on several points, particularly about my friendship with Gaston Revel, which remained strong right up until his death in 1939.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] objeta la versión de Guénon sobre él y sobre Les Veilleurs, y señala un punto: su amistad con Gaston Revel duró hasta la muerte de este.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«I have always been direct and frank, and this has allowed me to experience in this life friendships that were impervious to any attack—and equally, a few enemies who were always hidden, acting surreptitiously.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] se describe franco y anota enemigos siempre escondidos, sin nombrarlos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«Some called me diabolical, others satanic or attributed to me black masses and other stupidities. The Surrealists called me Luciferian, basing this on an essay entitled “Adam, l’homme rouge,” which I burned.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] enumera las acusaciones que recibió y declara haber quemado el ensayo *Adam, l’homme rouge*, en el que los surrealistas fundaban la de luciferino: es el mismo libro que en la plana 95 Canseliet dice haber leído prestado en 1933.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«In 1921, I broke with all these movements: Les Veilleurs, Centre Apostolique, and—from one day to the next—I closed down the paper Le Veilleur, which had become a magazine.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] data en 1921 su ruptura con Les Veilleurs y el Centre Apostolique y el cierre de la revista, de un día para otro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«In general, I never appeared in public. It was to Carlos Larronde—also a great friend of Milosz—that I delegated the task of speaking in public, to which he was perfectly suited.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] declara no haber aparecido nunca en público y haber delegado esa tarea en Carlos Larronde: la discreción que su carta reivindica es la que hace de él, en la tesis de Dubois, un autor invisible.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«The last time I saw my great friend Milosz, who more and more took refuge in Catholicism (for personal reasons that I am probably the only one to be acquainted with), was in 1929, when he said to me, in his style that bordered on the whimsical: “Why don’t you want to turn Catholic? Then there would be at least two Catholics in the world.”»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] data en 1929 su último encuentro con Milosz y transcribe su broma sobre la conversión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«O. W. de Lubicz-Milosz, prince of Lusace, count of Labunovo, head of the Bozawola branch of the Lubicz clan, welcomed me into this clan with the right to the coat of arms and to its titles. What there is that is most precious for me in this affair is to wear the ring with the Lubicz arms, a jewel that belonged to Milosz’s father, a constant reminder for me of one of my most sincere and most rewarding friendships.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] enumera los títulos de Milosz y cuenta su acogida en el clan Lubicz, con el anillo del padre del poeta por prenda.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«From 1930 on, I sought out isolation, and, giving my new address to only a few friends, I secluded myself here at Plan-de-Grasse and later for two years in Mallorca, in an old hospice from the time of Raymond Lully, then in Egypt, source of all wisdom.»[Schwaller, carta de 1960] data en 1930 su retiro y traza su itinerario, de Plan-de-Grasse a Mallorca y de allí a Egipto, que llama fuente de toda sabiduría.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 92»

«Appendix E TRANSLATION OF PIERRE DUJOLS’S OBITUARY For a facsimile of the obituary, see figure 5.15 on page 80.»Dubois declara que el apéndice E es traducción del obituario de Dujols y remite al facsímil reproducido en el cuerpo; el obituario apareció en el *Voile d’Isis* y su firmante no se nombra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«This past April 19, Mr. Pierre Dujols died at the age of 64 after several days of suffering and a life that had been physically overwhelming for many years.»[obituario de Dujols, transcrito por Dubois] data la muerte el 19 de abril a los sesenta y cuatro años, tras una vida físicamente abrumadora.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«Mr. Dujols, not well known by the general public, was known to a small circle of people who struggled to penetrate the secrets of hermetic science.»[obituario] acota la fama de Dujols a un círculo pequeño de gente empeñada en la ciencia hermética.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«In my opinion, Mr. Dujols possessed a body of knowledge in this field that places him at the forefront of those who studied the Kabbalah and hermeticism in modern times.»[obituario] pone a Dujols a la cabeza de los estudiosos modernos de la cábala y del hermetismo, y lo enuncia expresamente como opinión propia del firmante.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«His extensive learning is evidenced by the catalog of esoteric books that he published before the war in a substantial octavo volume that constitutes a real storehouse of useful information and quality summaries based on the sometimes considerable analysis he devoted to the works being cataloged.»[obituario] funda ese juicio en un catálogo de libros esotéricos publicado por Dujols antes de la guerra, con análisis extensos de las obras catalogadas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«The studies by Mr. Dujols on the books he examined were made for his own use and were integrated with the knowledge he had already accumulated. They point out those things that are useful to know in order to develop the initiation that each individual must acquire by his own efforts, and not through the didactic teaching of a group leader.»[obituario] describe esos análisis como hechos para uso propio y enuncia de paso una posición sobre la iniciación: se adquiere por esfuerzo propio y no por la enseñanza de un jefe de grupo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«We might ask, “Why did he write nothing himself? Why did he not put forth his personal synthesis?” Indeed, all we know that is written by him besides these analyses is the preface he wrote to the Mutus Liber of Mr. Nourry, a preface that shines with the vast learning, or rather, the “knowledge” that he possessed.»[obituario] se plantea por qué Dujols no escribió su propia síntesis y reduce su obra conocida al prefacio del *Mutus Liber* de Nourry: el silencio del personaje queda planteado como problema ya en 1926.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«He did, however, leave behind a manuscript that he did not think suitable to publish during his lifetime. I do not know if it will be made public, but I do hope that this effort from an entire lifetime not be left forever in darkness.»[obituario] consigna un manuscrito que Dujols no quiso publicar en vida y del que el firmante ignora el destino: la pieza que la tesis de Dubois sitúa dentro de *Les Demeures Philosophales*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«A disturbing question remains about this elevated personality who has left us: Did he really, as I believe he did, know the secret of the Great Work?»[obituario] deja abierta la pregunta de si Dujols conocía el secreto de la Gran Obra, y adelanta que su firmante lo cree.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 93»

«for glory or fame and of a fundamentally honest nature—was acquainted with the operational method of the Great Work, and if he did not pursue it to its ultimate accomplishment, it was only because he had to suspend his operations by reason of his state of health and by reason of material and financial difficulties.»[obituario] atribuye a Dujols el conocimiento del método operativo de la Gran Obra y explica su falta de culminación por la salud y el dinero; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 93 con *would indicate (as my personal conviction indicates) that this man—so detached from a search*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«For those who do not believe in the reality of metallic transmutations but only in a representation of the sublimating operations of the soul, or for those who, like myself, tend not to be so concerned about this issue, he maintained with all his authority that metallic transmutation is possible, that it was known from the most remote antiquity, and that it is knowledge of that alone that can provide the power—a power both sacred and royal—to confer on the initiates the knowledge of the spiritual and material laws of the universe as well as its past and future history.»[obituario] consigna la posición de Dujols sobre la transmutación metálica —posible y sabida desde la antigüedad, y única fuente del poder sacro y regio del iniciado— y la contrapone a la lectura psicológica; el firmante declara de paso su propia indiferencia ante el asunto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«He took his secret with him, having judged it not good to divulge, even to those who shared his complete confidence, but his life can be an example: Those who truly embark upon the hermetic way must expect, as did he, to meet silence, isolation, solitude, and the lack of understanding of others.»[obituario] consigna que Dujols se llevó su secreto sin confiarlo ni a los más próximos, y hace de su vida un ejemplo de silencio y soledad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«There are reasons why the word hermit has so many connections with the name Hermes.»[obituario] deriva la palabra ermitaño del nombre de Hermes: la cábala fonética aplicada dentro de la propia esquela.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«At the threshold of such a life, the being hesitates and ponders; he cannot conceive that he might, at the same time, have so much knowledge and not be understood. As Christ in the Olive Garden, he is tempted to say: “Father, remove this cup from me.”»[obituario] describe la vacilación de quien entra en esa vía y la pone en boca de Cristo en el huerto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«But also like Christ, he cannot avoid entering the via dolorosa where there awaits him abandonment by friends, scorn, being spat upon by the ignorant, and the ascension of Calvary up until the moment when finally, for him, the veil of the Temple is rent.»[obituario] sigue la analogía crística hasta el velo del Templo rasgado, con el abandono y el escarnio por estaciones.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«Mr. Pierre Dujols ascended his Calvary and now, for him, no doubt, the Holy of Holies is devoid of mystery.»[obituario] cierra dando a Dujols por llegado al Sanctasanctórum: el texto que Dubois usa como documento sobre un hombre es, en su registro, una hagiografía.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 94»

«Appendix F TRANSLATION OF THE LETTER FROM CANSELIET TO SCHWALLER DE LUBICZ For a facsimile of the letter, see figure 6.1 on pages, 102–103. Paris, December 4, 1933»Dubois declara el apéndice F traducción de la carta de Canseliet a Schwaller y la data en París el 4 de diciembre de 1933, con remisión al facsímil.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«Sir: It is possible that my name which appears on the back of the envelope is not entirely unknown to you, for, very connected as you were with Mr. Champagne in the final years of his life, you must have heard him sometimes speak of me.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] escribe a un desconocido y da por sentado el trato estrecho de este con Champagne en los últimos años: el discípulo conocía el vínculo aunque no su contenido.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«Since his death, I have continued by myself the pursuit of an aim that arose from a collaboration lasting seven years and for which purpose we had rented, in January 1925, two adjoining garrets at 59A rue de Rochechouart.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] data en enero de 1925 el alquiler de las dos buhardillas contiguas y cifra en siete años la colaboración con Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«As it happens, I have had the good fortune and the pleasure to receive in the past few days the loan of a very interesting book, Adam, l’homme rouge, and to have learned from it what our common friend had failed to tell me: that you are the author of this curious and scholarly work.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] declara el motivo de la carta: haber sabido por un préstamo, y no por Champagne, que Schwaller es el autor de *Adam, l’homme rouge*. La reticencia de Champagne queda documentada por el propio discípulo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«In conformity with this new orientation, we both engaged once again in the study of caput mortuum from the first work, which we had always rejected as useless scoria having no value.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] cuenta que él y Champagne volvieron sobre el *caput mortuum* de la primera obra, antes desechado como escoria.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«No doubt we were wrong about that because numerous philosophers assured us that this material, with its crude aspect and its strong odor, is the flower of all metals, the flos florum, which they regard so highly.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] enmienda ese descarte apoyándose en los filósofos, que llaman a esa materia flor de todos los metales.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«They gave it this name because just as the flower prepares the fruit and as the fruit is virtual in the flower, this earth carries within it the invisible embryo of a new mineral essence.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] razona el nombre por analogía con la flor que prepara el fruto: la tierra lleva el embrión invisible de una esencia mineral nueva.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«The Turba Philosophorum warns us of this in two different places. In one of these, “Eximiganus says: Know that our entire primary intention is the misty Maye jacket”; in the other reference, “Theophilus says: Know, all you sons, of the doctrine that the secret of everything is a misty covering of which the Philosophers have so often spoken.”»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] apoya el punto en dos pasajes de la *Turba Philosophorum*, atribuidos a Eximiganus y a Teófilo; las grafías son las que imprime la traducción del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«Indeed, Avicenna teaches that we must assemble our material consisting of droppings, filth, and rot from the sun and the moon.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] añade a Avicena, que manda reunir la materia entre deyecciones y podredumbre del sol y de la luna.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«Some philosophers, in order to characterize the impurity of the magma from which the hermetic lily is born, have given it the name manure.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] recoge el nombre de estiércol que algunos filósofos dan al magma del que nace el lirio hermético.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«The sage knows how to recognize our stone even in the manure, claims the Cosmopolite, whereas the one who is ignorant will not be able to find me in gold.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] cita al Cosmopolita sobre el sabio que reconoce la piedra en el estiércol y el ignorante que no la halla en el oro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«This is a warning given to the craftsman who might be tempted, within the natural separation or decomposition, to keep the brilliant, the dazzling, the splendid, because it seems to him to be very pure, while despising the residual manure, these feces, “filthy and foul,” in the midst of which, however, there rests and hides the best of what he is looking for.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] extrae de esa cita la advertencia práctica: no quedarse con lo brillante de la separación y no despreciar el residuo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 95»

«I am continuing, then, the labors of the Great Work in that direction which I have no doubt you would have impressed upon the experimentations of Mr. Champagne.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] declara continuar la Gran Obra en la dirección que atribuye a Schwaller: el discípulo da por hecho que Schwaller marcaba los experimentos de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«As a result, and especially after reading Adam l’homme rouge, I am led to believe that you would have yourself obtained in the laboratory this alchemical mercury, this adamic earth that is also Adam, l’homme rouge.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] conjetura que el propio Schwaller obtuvo en laboratorio el mercurio alquímico, la tierra adámica del título de su libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«Why these substances: sulfur, salt, and mercury? Because they are as typical as can be. Sulfur, product of the fire of the earth; mercury, the water of metals, or the first earthly body; and salt, the stable state that is most pervasive.»[Schwaller, *Adam, l’homme rouge*, citado por Canseliet] define los tres principios: azufre por fuego de la tierra, mercurio por agua de los metales y sal por estado estable.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«On the other hand, sulfur coagulates mercury and forms a salt that is black and red. We must remember that the Rosicrucian philosophers never took the words sulfur, salt, and mercury for anything other than symbols of the Trinity.»[Schwaller, citado por Canseliet] describe la coagulación del mercurio por el azufre y lee los tres principios de los filósofos rosacruces como símbolos de la Trinidad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«There is a principle that acts, a principle that receives, and the two form, through a mutual love (successive attraction and repulsion from the process of generation), the perfect salt that is three in one: God in the trinity, called into the material work of the philosophers—the philosopher’s stone, the word stone here signifying symbolically the perfect form, the most stable, the most material, the most ‘formal.’ And the modifier philosopher’s means that it is to be heard in the sense of esoteric knowledge»[Schwaller, citado por Canseliet] deriva la sal perfecta del principio que obra y el que recibe, y explica el nombre de la piedra filosofal: piedra por forma acabada y estable, y filosofal por conocimiento esotérico.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«This whole passage, in my mind, constitutes a revelation that is of no small importance.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] declara ese pasaje una revelación importante: es el discípulo de Champagne reconociendo autoridad doctrinal a Schwaller.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«As for woman, she holds in herself the memory of her decline from man into woman. She cannot become man except by blending herself with him. Then the two will no longer be two but an animated substance.”»[Schwaller, citado por Canseliet] enuncia la caída del hombre en mujer y su reunión en una sustancia animada, pasaje que Canseliet llama gran secreto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«Whatever it may be, I have not managed to banish the painful impression that has been left in me by unexpected events, by unsuspected facts, that arose both at the end of his life and after his death and which gave rise to horrible scenes.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] alude sin detallarlos a hechos inesperados del final y de después de la muerte de Champagne, que dieron lugar a escenas horribles.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«I scarcely know how to determine whether these scenes were more disgusting than they were painful. I must also say that for a long time, there had arisen unnoticed and had been maintained over him the deplorable domination of a woman»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] atribuye a una mujer un dominio sobre Champagne, sin nombrarla; el tramo se corta ahí porque el guion de fin de renglón de la palabra siguiente quedaría cosido dentro de las comillas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«But all that is nothing and is of no interest other than that interest, negligible in itself, which we can attach to the fabricated things of this world. It is a completely different value that I ascribe to the response that you might judge proper to send me in order to enlighten me, insofar as you judge it useful so to do, given the key importance of the great work.»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] desatiende esas escenas y reduce su interés a lo que Schwaller quiera contestarle sobre la obra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«Yours truly, Eugène Canseliet 10 quai des Célestins Paris, 4th arrondissement»[Canseliet a Schwaller, 1933] firma con su domicilio parisino.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 96»

«Appendix G CHRONOLOGY OF EUGÈNE CANSELIET (FROM ATORÈNE, LE LABORATOIRE ALCHIMIQUE, TRÉDANIEL) 1899 He is born at Sarcelles (département of Val-d’Oise) on Monday, December 18, 8:00 p.m., the son of Eugène-Léon Canseliet. His father, a mason, dies in 1919.»Dubois declara en el propio encabezado que esta cronología no es suya sino de Atorène, y abre con el nacimiento de Canseliet en Sarcelles el 18 de diciembre de 1899, hijo de un albañil.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 97»

«1916 He becomes a friend of Jean-Julien Champagne. 1917 He obtains his baccalaureate in Latin and Greek literature at Aix-en-Provence. 1920 He is employed in accounting at the gas factory in Sarcelles.»[cronología de Atorène] data en 1916 la amistad con Champagne —un año después de lo que dice el cuerpo del libro—, el bachillerato en letras clásicas y el empleo de contable en la fábrica de gas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 97»

«1921 On January 15, he marries Raymonde Caillard, age nineteen. Divorce follows. 1921 On August 10, his son, Henri; is born. Henri dies seven years later.»[cronología de Atorène] el primer matrimonio de Canseliet, el divorcio y el hijo Henri, muerto a los siete años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 97»

«1922 He attends a transmutation carried out by Fulcanelli at the gas factory in Sarcelles. 1925 He moves into a garret at 59A rue de Rochechouart next to Jean-Julien Champagne. In December, the publisher Jean Schémit agrees to publish the manuscript Le Mystère des Cathédrales, brought to him by Canseliet.»[cronología de Atorène] la transmutación de 1922 hecha por Fulcanelli, la buhardilla contigua a Champagne y el dato clave de diciembre de 1925: fue Canseliet quien llevó el manuscrito a Schémit.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 97»

«1926 Le Mystère des Cathédrales is published in an edition of three hundred copies. 1927 On January 3 his daughter, Solange, is born. 1930 Les Demeures Philosophales is published in an edition of five hundred copies.»[cronología de Atorène] las tiradas de los dos libros, trescientos y quinientos ejemplares.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 97»

«1937 On January 26, he marries Solange’s mother, Germaine Raymonde Hubat. 1938 He moves into an apartment at Deuil-la-Barre (département of Vald’Oise) with his whole family. On July 21, his second daughter, Isabelle, is born. 1939 He moves with his family to Blicourt, near Beauvais (département of Somme).»[cronología de Atorène] el segundo matrimonio de Canseliet y las mudanzas de 1938 y 1939; *Vald’Oise* (sic) es la grafía sin guion que imprime la capa de texto aquí, frente al *Val-d’Oise* de la primera entrada.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 98»

«1945 His book Deux Logis alchimiques (Two Alchemical Dwellings) is published by Schémit. 1946 In June, he goes to live in Savignies, near Beauvais.»[cronología de Atorène] el *Deux Logis alchimiques* de 1945 en Schémit y la instalación en Savignies, de donde viene el apodo de Maestro de Savignies.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 98»

«1955 He translates (and adds his commentary to) Les Douze Clefs de la philosophie (The Twelve Keys of Philosophy) by Basile Valentin. It is published in 1956 by Les Éditions de Minuit. 1964 Alchimie is published by Pauvert.»[cronología de Atorène] la traducción comentada de las *Doce Claves* de Basilio Valentín y el *Alchimie* de 1964.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 98»

«1974 He suffers coronary thrombosis and recovers with the aid of the alchemical salt of dew. 1975 Trois Anciens Traités d’Alchimie (Three Ancient Treatises on Alchemy) is published by Pauvert. 1982 Eugène Canseliet dies. He is buried at La Neuville-Vault.»[cronología de Atorène] la trombosis de 1974, de la que dice que se repuso con la sal alquímica de rocío, y la muerte de Canseliet en 1982.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 98»

«Appendix H NATAL CHART OF PIERRE DUJOLS He was born at Saint-Illide in the Cantal region on March 22, 1862, at 7:00 a.m. His chart can be summarized as follows: 2 trines, 2 squares, 2 conjunctions, 6 planets out of 10 are unaspected.»[apéndice H, firmado por François Trojani] levanta la carta natal de Dujols sobre la fecha y hora que da la plana 24 y resume su configuración; seis de diez planetas quedan sin aspecto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 99»

«The use of 72-degree aspects will facilitate the interpretation of the chart, although their use introduces a difficulty as to the attribution and use of such angles. We find four such aspects.»[Trojani] declara que recurrirá al aspecto de 72 grados y a la vez la dificultad que su uso plantea.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 99»

«Three 72-degree aspects mark a personality or a circumstance that is really out of the ordinary, indicating thereby a life that relates to that which is beyond, toward elsewhere, as we might say: the place behind the mirror, the world of unmanifest things and of the unfolding of events.»[Trojani] atribuye a tres aspectos de 72 grados una vida vuelta hacia el más allá, hacia el otro lado del espejo y lo no manifestado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 99»

«Classical astrology provides very few indications of the properties of this aspect. On the other hand, it divides the 360-degree circle into five equal parts.»[Trojani] declara el límite de su instrumento: la astrología clásica dice muy poco de ese aspecto, que divide el círculo en cinco.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 99»

«The 72-degree aspect is an aspect of Leo. Some authors attribute to it the properties of good fortune, of creation, a sort of baraka.»[Trojani] adscribe ese aspecto a Leo y le atribuye, según algunos autores, fortuna y creación, una especie de baraka.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 99»

«The ruler of the chart, the Sun in the present case, is exalted at 1 degree of Aries, but it is in the twelfth house, which portends good fortune, a social success through the intermediary of secret, occult, and hidden facts.»[Trojani] lee el Sol exaltado en la casa doce como éxito social por vía de lo secreto y oculto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«This same Sun at 1 degree of Aries is framed by Neptune and Pluto. Pluto is in its detriment in the sign of Taurus. This triptych is the mark of an active search using the imagination.»[Trojani] lee el Sol enmarcado por Neptuno y Plutón como marca de una búsqueda activa por la imaginación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«The Aries Ascendant between the Sun and Pluto is an indicator of strong activity and of convictions bitterly defended.»[Trojani] lee el ascendente en Aries como actividad fuerte y convicciones defendidas con dureza.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«Through Pluto, there is a work and a personality behind the scenes, along with scarcely common endeavors and a constant need to hide a segment of life.»[Trojani] lee en Plutón una obra y una personalidad entre bastidores y la necesidad constante de ocultar una parte de la vida: la carta devuelve, en su lenguaje, el mismo retrato que el capítulo 4.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«This same Pluto is in an aspect of 72 degrees with Venus approaching the twelfth house. That aspect is the indicator of a secret passion governing the existence.»[Trojani] lee el aspecto de Plutón con Venus como pasión secreta que gobierna la existencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«The Sun, ruler of the Ascendant in the twelfth house, conjunct Neptune, predestines, once again, an individual’s hiding of himself and at times a self-delusion in spite of an important interior life.»[Trojani] lee la conjunción del Sol con Neptuno como ocultamiento de sí y a veces autoengaño, con vida interior importante.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«Mars is exalted in the sign of Capricorn in the tenth house and predisposes an individual to shine late in life.»[Trojani] lee a Marte exaltado en la casa diez como brillo tardío.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«Taurus is in the second house, conjunct the Black Moon. Karma affects material goods. The ruler of this second house, Venus, is on the cusp of the Moon. The second ruler, the Moon, which is squaring Jupiter, with Jupiter itself being retrograde in the sixth house and in Virgo, leads us to think that the wealth of this individual is secret or spiritual and arises essentially from his work.»[Trojani] deriva de la casa dos una riqueza secreta o espiritual nacida del propio trabajo, y un karma sobre los bienes materiales.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«The sign of Gemini is in the third house; its ruler Mercury is in the twelfth in Pisces. This is the sign of an intelligence that draws its strength from dreams and faith.»[Trojani] lee en la casa tres una inteligencia que saca su fuerza de los sueños y de la fe.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«The Moon in Sagittarius in the ninth house squares Jupiter in the sixth, in its detriment and retrograde. Jupiter is also conjunct Saturn; this suggests that the latter part of life is sickly, although spent in higher pursuits, and is undoubtedly laborious.»[Trojani] lee la cuadratura de la Luna con Júpiter como una vejez enfermiza y laboriosa, dedicada sin embargo a cosas altas: coincide con la postración documentada en la plana 32.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 100»

«Moon limits his social recognition and success. Certain digestive or skeletal functions can be affected by chronic conditions. Mercury, ruler of Virgo, suggests a tendency toward a certain isolation.»[Trojani] deriva de la casa seis un reconocimiento social limitado, dolencias crónicas y tendencia al aislamiento; el tramo arranca con la palabra partida por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 100 con *Virgo is in the sixth house with Saturn and Jupiter conjunct*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«Libra is in the seventh house. Its rulers are, respectively, in the twelfth house (Venus) and in the sixth (Saturn). This can make for contracts that turn into hardships later on.»[Trojani] lee en la casa siete contratos que se vuelven adversidad más tarde.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«Scorpio is in the eighth house. Its ruler, Mars, is exalted in Capricorn in the tenth. The psychic power of the individual is exalted; this individual can be led to seek or to discover people with powers.»[Trojani] lee en la casa ocho un poder psíquico exaltado y la busca de personas con poderes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«The twelfth house is very full. There we find Venus, Neptune, Mercury, and the Sun. Venus is in the sign of Pisces. Mercury here helps discovery through reasoning based on hidden facts. Venus mitigates the ordeals in part, but Neptune suggests betrayal.»[Trojani] describe la casa doce cargada y saca de Neptuno la traición: la lectura astrológica llega, por su camino, al robo que narra el capítulo 5.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«Let us be cautious, however, with this very classical and limited interpretation. We could say that the 72-degree aspects indicate good fortune up to a given point. We could add, in summary, that in spite of an exceptional wisdom, destiny strongly limits the goals of this individual.»[Trojani] acota expresamente su propia interpretación por clásica y limitada, y resume que el destino restringe fuertemente los fines de este hombre pese a una sabiduría excepcional.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«The taste for the secret is too pronounced, the home inadequate, the income certainly insufficient, freedom is definite but spiritual: in the mind, attained late, and communicated to many.»[Trojani] cierra el retrato en cuatro rasgos: gusto excesivo por el secreto, casa insuficiente, ingresos escasos y una libertad solo espiritual, tardía y comunicada a muchos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«As an example of the use of 72-degree aspects, we can note the chart of a transmutation (fig. H.2), that of the gold medallion shown by an adept to the chemist Helvetius.»[Trojani] añade como ejemplo del método la carta del medallón de oro que un adepto mostró al químico Helvetius.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«At first glance, any well-informed astrologer will distinguish in it the whole importance that the alchemists attribute to astrology. The gold from transmutations is here understood in its true aim—that of a priestly and theurgic tokening.»[Trojani] enuncia de esa carta lo que le importa: la astrología pesa en los alquimistas, y el oro de las transmutaciones tiene por fin verdadero ser señal sacerdotal y teúrgica, no riqueza.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«Paris, October 14, 1991 François Trojani, author of the alchemical commentary on Tarots de Mantegna, Éditions Seydoux»el apéndice H va firmado en París el 14 de octubre de 1991 por François Trojani, comentarista alquímico de los *Tarots de Mantegna*: la pieza es de otra mano y el volumen lo declara.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 101»

«The text accompanying it reads as follows: “From Jehovah. The marvelous and miraculous Knowledge expresses itself in the Holy Book of Nature. I was made August 26, 1666.”»[pie de lámina] la fig. H.2 levanta la carta sobre la fecha inscrita en el medallón de oro de Elias Arista que vio Helvecio, y transcribe la leyenda de la pieza, que habla en primera persona.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 102»

«Appendix I NATAL CHART OF JEAN-JULIEN CHAMPAGNE Champagne was born on January 23, 1877, at 10:00 a.m., at Levallois-Perret. He was an Aquarian by his Sun sign with an Aries Ascendant.»[apéndice I, firmado por Véronique Guilet] levanta la carta natal de Champagne sobre la fecha y hora que da la plana 24.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 103»

«If the natal chart is the structure of the energies of an individual, describing the potentialities that can be developed in the course of his existence and then accomplished, only a direct contact with the individual can inform us about his level of consciousness, his understanding of his own riches, and the integration of his inner conflicts.»[Guilet] acota de entrada el alcance de la carta: describe potencialidades, y solo el trato directo con la persona informaría de su nivel de conciencia y de sus conflictos. La reserva se enuncia antes de leer una carta de alguien muerto en 1932.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 103»

«Given these cautions regarding the use of this chart, the aim of the examination of the chart of Champagne will be, above all, to grasp his essence in its entirety.»[Guilet] declara, con esas cautelas por delante, cuál es su objeto: captar la esencia de Champagne entera.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 103»

«Very marked by his solar sign, Aquarius, he is above all an idealist, an innovator, scarcely a conformist, and independent. Deeply touched by the evolution of human beings, he aspires in a brotherly enthusiasm to bring his Promethean contribution to the human race.»[Guilet] retrata a Champagne por su Sol en Acuario: idealista, innovador, poco conformista e independiente, con una aportación que llama prometeica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 103»

«Another powerful element in his chart, Jupiter in Sagittarius in the ninth house, reinforces humanitarian idealism and the quest for truth. Carried away by an insatiable and boundless thirst for knowledge, in a welcoming attitude of tolerance he always seeks to blend Epicureanism and philosophy, science and spirituality.»[Guilet] lee en Júpiter en Sagitario la sed de saber y la mezcla de epicureísmo y filosofía, ciencia y espiritualidad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«The conjunction of Mercury and the Sun in the sign of Aquarius makes him a very cerebral being, impassioned by reading and writing.»[Guilet] lee en la conjunción de Mercurio y el Sol una cabeza apasionada por la lectura y la escritura: el rasgo se acomoda a la tesis del libro, que atribuye a Champagne la redacción.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«The support of Mars in the conjunction of Sun-Mercury makes him pragmatic, an experimenter, a practical and positive soul who loves to plunge into concrete realities, always giving precedence to the application and the utilitarian rather than to pure abstraction. His eagerness to plunge in is equaled only by his impatience.»[Guilet] lee en Marte al experimentador práctico, más aplicado a lo concreto que a la abstracción, y anota su impaciencia.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«We might even risk describing him as a gentle visionary, a wild romantic with an unstructured life, living at the whim of his reckless humor; he experiences a kind of letting go through a direct contact with the movements of the soul.»[Guilet] arriesga la fórmula del visionario apacible, romántico de vida sin estructura.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«Letting his imagination wander in the land of ecstasy and prolonging moments of illumination and even of higher consciousness become so imperative that we can easily imagine he is tempted more often than he ought to be by stimulants of all sorts, prolonging through them his subtle madness and delaying the moment of a return to day-to-day reality.»[Guilet] deduce de la carta la tentación de los estimulantes: coincide con la absenta y el gálbano documentados en la plana 63, y ella lo enuncia como conjetura, *we can easily imagine*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«As does any individual ahead of his time and far from the daily concerns of his contemporaries, he may often shock, astonish, or disturb those around him as much by his marginal manner of living as by his eccentric clothing.»[Guilet] deriva de la carta el efecto que Champagne causaba por su vida marginal y su ropa excéntrica, que el cuerpo del libro describe en la plana 55.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«Only a quest for truth has importance in his eyes. It is this truth that the Ascendant Aries, well aspected by Mars in Sagittarius in the eighth house, pursues wildly, with force and enthusiasm and with no regard for his life or for his health.»[Guilet] lee en el ascendente y en Marte una busca de la verdad sin miramientos por la vida ni por la salud.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«We must imagine him as a fierce worker, indefatigable, throwing himself as if intoxicated—sometimes even at death’s door—into Herculean and dangerous battles. In other words, racing cars might attract him.»[Guilet] imagina a Champagne trabajador infatigable metido en batallas hercúleas, y aventura que le atraerían los coches de carreras: la carta acierta de refilón con el propulsor y el trineo de la plana 40.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«Through Mars, ruler of the Ascendant in the eighth house, he gives importance only to that which is difficult, that which offers a challenge to be taken up, that in which an exploration calls him.»[Guilet] deriva de Marte en la casa ocho el interés exclusivo por lo difícil y lo que reta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«Always to push farther the limits of sensual pleasure: Is this not the beginning of a spiritual search, the ignition of an opening awareness of the transmutation of energies? This is entirely the symbolism of the eighth house: sexuality as an initiatory death leading to rebirth.»[Guilet] lee la sexualidad de la casa ocho como muerte iniciática y renacimiento, y la enlaza con la transmutación de las energías.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«For Champagne, any search can be accompanied only by the integration of energies from “below.” Mars makes explicit in his chart this burning desire to explore our dark side in order to bring it to the light, a desire to exorcise this darkness without fear or restraint.»[Guilet] deriva de Marte el deseo de explorar la parte oscura para sacarla a la luz.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 104»

«destructive neurosis that could compromise the stability of the personality. In this case, there is a contradiction between the sign of Taurus and that of Aquarius: the need of Taurus to be attached to the material and the desire of Aquarius to separate from it.»[Guilet] enuncia la contradicción central de la carta, entre el apego de Tauro a lo material y el desasimiento de Acuario; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 104 con *It is now time to broach the great contradiction of the chart*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Such is the challenge Champagne is offered if he truly wants to play the role of one who awakens humanity.»[Guilet] convierte esa contradicción en el reto que Champagne tendría que sortear para despertar a la humanidad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Originally, everything is material, and the Moon, in Taurus in this case, incarnates appropriately the original form, the raw material on which all our attachments and all our dependencies are built: voluptuousness of earthly food, unlimited pleasure of the senses, an instinct for owning and keeping.»[Guilet] lee la Luna en Tauro como forma original y materia prima de todos los apegos, con el placer de los sentidos y el instinto de posesión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«He is likely plagued by contradictory demands: taking advantage of the simple pleasures of life, not going beyond the material aspect of things, settling into permanency, and, at the other extreme, giving up all attachments and letting himself be guided by intuition of the ephemeral.»[Guilet] describe las dos exigencias contrarias que atribuye a Champagne, el goce de lo simple y el desasimiento total.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Venus in Capricorn imparts a taste for antiques, and the good aspect of Venus to the Moon confers on him an undeniable seductive charm that attracts feminine attention—an attention that, of course, he appreciates.»[Guilet] deriva de Venus en Capricornio el gusto por lo antiguo y un atractivo que las mujeres notan: el retrato coincide con el éxito con las damas que da la plana 25.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«We would be fooling ourselves to think that Champagne is completely uninterested in matters of money. An individual who shares his natal chart has his little deals and tricks, and he may occasionally live out a filching worthy of Harpagon in Molière’s The Miser.»[Guilet] objeta el desinterés de Champagne por el dinero y admite en él pequeños manejos, con una comparación con Harpagón.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Coming back to the Moon, which is in a strategic position in Champagne’s chart, we find it framed by Neptune and Pluto. If Neptune represents a function of dissolution, Pluto represents transformation, a destruction leading to rebirth.»[Guilet] lee la Luna enmarcada por Neptuno y Plutón como disolución y transformación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«This is the necessity of destroying matter in order to get to the heart of the atom and then to reconstitute a different, restructured material purged of its flabbiness and imperfection. How can we not see in this insistent torture of matter the whole alchemical process, which begins with the dissolution of matter and seeks its transmutation?»[Guilet] traslada esa lectura al proceso alquímico entero, que empieza por disolver la materia y busca transmutarla: la astróloga hace explícito el paralelo que sostiene todo el apéndice.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Beyond this alchemical connection, it must be understood how, with Pluto, the sensitivity of Champagne is painful, an ever-present anguish with a poignant feeling of insecurity and exclusion.»[Guilet] atribuye a Plutón una sensibilidad dolorosa en Champagne, con angustia, inseguridad y exclusión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Liberating oneself from matter while integrating the invasive shadowy part and making from it an elixir of life: This is the basis of all the creativity in which Champagne was engaged.»[Guilet] resume la creatividad de Champagne como liberación de la materia integrando la sombra hasta hacer de ella un elixir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 105»

«Uranus in the sixth house attests to all his qualities as a technician and his truly scientific mind, and Venus finds all her meaning in Capricorn, while seeking sobriety and the delineation of forms.»[Guilet] lee en Urano las cualidades de técnico y la mentalidad científica de Champagne, que es lo que el cuerpo del libro le reconoce sin discusión.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 106»

«Capricorn in the tenth house and its ruler Saturn in the twelfth house suggest late recognition and posthumous fame.»[Guilet] lee en la casa diez un reconocimiento tardío y una fama póstuma.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 106»

«Saturn in the twelfth house is also, for him, the field of his accomplishment and of his rising above himself: a work of research that is lonely, humble, and laborious, sheltered from curious looks, the choice of an existence that is less glorious and the acceptance of cultivating his own secret garden in silence.»[Guilet] lee en Saturno en la casa doce un trabajo de investigación solitario, humilde y a resguardo de miradas, y una vida menos gloriosa aceptada por elección.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 106»

«Cast in May 1989 by Véronique Guilet, astrologer, Grenoble»el apéndice I va firmado en mayo de 1989 por la astróloga Véronique Guilet, de Grenoble, la ciudad del grupo espiritualista al que el prólogo adscribe a Dubois.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 106»

«Fig. 4.3. Watercolor by Champagne: “Beauvoir-Rivière,” Soleil Couchant, August 9, 1895. Fig. 4.4. Miniature pendulum clock carved by Champagne.»[pies de lámina] las figs. 4.3 y 4.4 documentan la obra plástica de Champagne, con la acuarela de 1895 fechada y el reloj tallado en forma de iglesia gótica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 26»

«Fig. 4.8. Title page of the book written by Antoine Dujols de Valois. Fig. 4.9. Extract from Antoine Dujols’s birth certificate.»[pies de lámina] las figs. 4.8 y 4.9 reproducen la portada del opúsculo dinástico de Antoine Dujols y un extracto de su partida de nacimiento.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 31»

«Fig. 4.11. Letter from Pierre Dujols to Papus.»[pie de lámina] la fig. 4.11 reproduce la carta sin fecha de Dujols a Papus que la plana 32 sitúa por horquilla entre 1912 y 1916.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 34»

«Fig. 5.2. A sample of the handwriting of Jean-Julien Champagne.»[pie de lámina] la fig. 5.2 reproduce una muestra de la letra de Champagne, que es la pieza con la que las figs. 5.21 y 5.22 invitan a comparar la dedicatoria de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 42»

«Fig. 5.8. Louis Allainguillaume Fig. 5.9. Letter from Jean-Julien Champagne addressed to Allainguillaume»[pies de lámina] las figs. 5.8 y 5.9 documentan al comerciante de carbón que financiaba a Schwaller y una carta que Champagne le dirigió: el trato entre ambos queda probado por escrito.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 50»

«Fig. 5.11. Aor and Isha Fig. 5.12. Isha Schwaller de Lubicz»[pies de lámina] las figs. 5.11 y 5.12 retratan a Aor y a Isha.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 53»

«Fig. 5.13. Laboratory equipment and a spectrometer belonging to Aor. The furniture came from Palma de Mallorca.»[pie de lámina] la fig. 5.13 documenta el instrumental y el espectrómetro de Schwaller, con el mueble traído de Palma de Mallorca donde pasó dos años según su carta del apéndice D.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 54»

«Fig. 5.19. Drawing of Jean-Julien Champagne, in red ink, by René Schwaller de Lubicz, February 1930»[pie de lámina] la fig. 5.19 reproduce el retrato a tinta roja de Champagne por Schwaller; el pie lo data en febrero de 1930, donde la plana 59 daba solo el año.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 60»

«Fig. 5.25. Grave of Jean-Julien Champagne at Arnouville-les-Gonesse (Seine-et-Oise).»[pie de lámina] la fig. 5.25 documenta la tumba de Champagne con su departamento.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 66»

«Fig. 6.4. One of the sides of the base of the cyclic cross at Hendaye. Photograph by José Fuentes»[pie de lámina] la fig. 6.4 documenta una cara del basamento de la cruz cíclica de Hendaya y acredita al fotógrafo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 77»

About the work

140 entries — what the apparatus and scholarship say about it

«CONTENTS Foreword PART 1. BACKGROUND 1. The Chain of Hermes, or the Persistence of the Science of Alchemy 2. The Tenor of the Times PART 2. MILIEU 3. The Art of Interpreting the Philosopher’s Stone, or the Appearance of Works Signed “Fulcanelli” 4. Pierre Dujols and the Librairie du Merveilleux»el índice reparte el volumen en tres partes rotuladas y el rótulo es ya la marcha del argumento: primero el trasfondo —la cadena de Hermes y el tono de la época—, luego el medio, con el capítulo del arte de interpretar la piedra filosofal y la aparición de los libros firmados, y con la librería de Pierre Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 4»

«PART 3. FULCANELLI UNVEILED 5. Jean-Julien Champagne and René Schwaller de Lubicz 6. The Legend Takes Root: Eugène Canseliet, Guardian of the Myth»la tercera parte se rotula *Fulcanelli Unveiled* y la componen los dos capítulos de nombres propios: Champagne con Schwaller de Lubicz, y Canseliet como guardián del mito. El rótulo enuncia la tesis del volumen antes de argumentarla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 4»

«A. Chronology of the Alchemical Revival B. Chronology of Commander Levet; Letter from Levet to Papus C. Chronology of René Schwaller de Lubicz D. Letter from René Schwaller to Unknown Recipient E. Translation of Pierre Dujols’s Obituary F. Translation of the Letter from Canseliet to Schwaller de Lubicz G. Chronology of Eugène Canseliet (from Atorène, Le Laboratoire Alchimique, Trédaniel) H. Natal Chart of Pierre Dujols I. Natal Chart of Jean-Julien Champagne J. Bibliography of the Works of René Schwaller de Lubicz»el índice enumera los apéndices, que son documento transcrito y no exposición: cronologías, la carta de Levet a Papus, la de Schwaller a un destinatario desconocido, el obituario de Dujols, la carta de Canseliet a Schwaller, la cronología de Canseliet tomada de Atorène y las dos cartas natales.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 4»

«Indeed, ever since the publication of the two famous works bearing this eloquent pseudonym, namely, Le Mystère des Cathédrales (1926)¹ and Les Demeures Philosophales (1930),² each subsequently republished twice, the attention of a certain segment of the public—the one generally limited in size but nevertheless attuned to the disciplines that have come to be known under the rubric of esotericism, understood to be a vast field in its own right—lost no time in becoming firmly fixated on the task of identifying the real author of these books, without, however, managing to puncture the facade of anonymity that has seemed impervious to all attack.»[Gallois] el prólogo data los dos libros firmados con el seudónimo —1926 y 1930, reeditados dos veces cada uno— y señala que el público lector del esoterismo se fijó de inmediato en identificar a su autor real sin conseguir romper la fachada de anonimato.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«The attempts at solving the mystery of Fulcanelli’s identity have been many. Even foreign countries, notably Spain, have been involved, without, in the end, any solution being found.»[Gallois] cuenta que los intentos han sido muchos y que también los ha habido fuera de Francia, España en particular, sin que ninguno diera con una solución.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«Various specialized journals have published serious articles bearing on this irksome question, but the mystery has remained intact, to the great disappointment of all those who have hoped for a solution.»[Gallois] añade que las revistas especializadas han publicado artículos serios sobre la cuestión y que el misterio siguió intacto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«Before proceeding further on the topic of Fulcanelli, however, I believe that it is of paramount importance to dispel in advance any ambiguity as to the true nature of alchemy, a subject so maligned and adapted to any purpose that anyone at all, no matter his qualifications, has felt free to offer an explanation of the meaning of this high science.»[Gallois] antepone a todo lo demás una aclaración sobre qué es la alquimia, porque —dice— es materia tan maltratada y acomodaticia que cualquiera se ha sentido con derecho a explicarla sin importar sus títulos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«Thus we hear talk of such things as “spiritual alchemy” and “Tantric alchemy” when we are not seeing alchemy saddled with psychoanalytical meanings by a certain school that is attached to psychic archetypes, notably those arising from the study of dreams and taking as their subject matter the study of man!»[Gallois] enumera los usos que rechaza —la *spiritual alchemy*, la *Tantric alchemy* y la lectura psicoanalítica por arquetipos psíquicos derivados del estudio de los sueños— por tomar al hombre como materia de la obra.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«All these erroneous conceptions seem to arise for some individuals entirely from the results of a total misunderstanding of the Sacred Art, whereas for others, these misunderstandings seem to come from a deliberate willfulness to lead minds astray.»[Gallois] distingue dos orígenes para esas lecturas: en unos, incomprensión del Arte Sagrado; en otros, voluntad deliberada de extraviar a los lectores.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«It should also be noted that in many works with alchemical aspirations, the authors, lacking adequate information, commit the common and unacceptable mistake of claiming a supposed “Black Work” that foreshadows, as they would say, two following stages designated, respectively, the “White Work” and the “Red Work.”»[Gallois] objeta el esquema de tres obras que corre por la literatura alquímica divulgada, donde una Obra Negra anunciaría a la Blanca y a la Roja.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«The truth of the matter is that these two “final” stages, which lead to real but different results, constitute within themselves alone the core of the hermetic work, the black representing only what the alchemists mean by “putrefaction.”»[Gallois] enuncia en su lugar dos etapas finales de resultado distinto, que por sí solas son el núcleo de la obra hermética, y reduce lo negro a lo que los alquimistas llaman putrefacción.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«In reality, it is quite clear that even though it absolutely cannot be thought of apart from its fiery oven, authentic alchemy is something entirely other.»[Gallois] sostiene que la alquimia auténtica es otra cosa, sin dejar de ser inseparable de su horno.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«And in order to defer to three authors who are duly qualified and whose authority in this matter is unanimously recognized in hermetic circles, I cannot resist the salutary obligation of transcribing their respective advice, starting with my old friend of forty years, Eugène Canseliet, the famous writer of prefaces for the two Fulcanelli works already mentioned, and who, in a manner not unpleasing to our omniscient scientists, declares forthrightly»[Gallois] apoya su definición en tres autoridades del medio hermético y abre por Eugène Canseliet, a quien llama amigo suyo de cuarenta años y prologuista de los dos libros de Fulcanelli.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 6»

«in his precious Alchimie expliquée sur les textes classiques: “How misguided it is that popular legend would have us believe that alchemy consists entirely in the artificial production of metallic gold when its principal goal is the discovery of the Universal Medicine that alone is the provider of the triple privilege of knowledge, health, and wealth.”»[Gallois cita a Canseliet] de su *Alchimie expliquée sur les textes classiques*: la leyenda popular reduce la alquimia a fabricar oro metálico cuando su meta principal sería la Medicina Universal, única proveedora del triple privilegio de conocimiento, salud y riqueza.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«Let us continue with these words from my very dear but recently departed friend Claude Lablatinière d’Ygé, who, in his Nouvelle Assemblée des Philosophes Chymiques, makes clear for us: “May those who think that alchemy is strictly of a character that is earthly, mineral, and metallic give it a wide berth.»[Gallois cita a Claude Lablatinière d’Ygé] de su *Nouvelle Assemblée des Philosophes Chymiques*, que aparta de la alquimia a quien la tenga por asunto solo terrestre, mineral y metálico.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«May those who think that alchemy is only a symbolism used to reveal through analogy the process of ‘spiritual revelation’—in short, that man is the material and the athanor is his work—abandon it.”»[Gallois cita a d’Ygé] la otra mitad de la misma advertencia, que aparta también a quien tome la alquimia por puro simbolismo de una revelación espiritual con el hombre por materia y el atanor por obra: la exigencia cae por igual sobre las dos lecturas opuestas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«Here is a clearly stated extract from the fifth “Épistola Hermetica,” published in the highly regarded journal Atlantis, founded by Paul Le Cour:»[Gallois] presenta su tercera autoridad, la quinta *Épistola Hermetica* aparecida en la revista Atlantis que fundó Paul Le Cour.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«Yes, there exists in fact only one alchemy that is not so much ours as that of Nicolas Flamel and that of Basile Valentin, the Cosmopolite, Cyliani, or Fulcanelli.»[Gallois cita la quinta *Épistola Hermetica*] que enuncia una sola alquimia y la identifica por una lista de nombres —Flamel, Basilio Valentín, el Cosmopolita, Cyliani, Fulcanelli—, con lo que el seudónimo entra en la serie de los clásicos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«How terribly crude it is seen to be—this idea often encountered that holds that alchemy is solely the wild pursuit of the ancient Chrysopoeia,a as if men of the past, just as those in this age of iron, had been only hateful materialists greedy for riches before all else, without the slightest concern for the welfare of their souls!»[Gallois cita la *Épistola Hermetica*] contra la idea de la alquimia como caza de la antigua Crisopeya, que supondría a los antiguos materialistas ávidos de riqueza y despreocupados de su alma.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«The ultimate goal of the alchemical quest, far and away beyond all other goals, consists in this: to help the person —one who is in no way a mystic—to establish his welfare while on this earth, just as such a person, leaning over the crucible, helps the raw material to be purified until the “Light of the Light” (that is, the Lumen de Lumine of the Nicene Creed of the year 325) is obtained.»[Gallois cita la *Épistola Hermetica*] la meta que sí le reconoce: ayudar a quien no es místico a asentar su bienestar en esta tierra igual que ayuda a purificar la materia bruta hasta obtener la Luz de la Luz, que la epístola identifica con el *Lumen de Lumine* del credo niceno de 325.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«Could anything be more explicit than these three incontrovertible declarations? Such statements are quite necessary in order to place those “Lovers of Science,” who are sincere but are just beginning on their guard against widely distributed and terrible books that can do nothing but lead us down the garden path.»[Gallois] cierra la serie de tres testimonios diciendo para qué la trajo: poner en guardia a los principiantes sinceros contra libros muy difundidos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«What is also indicated by this is how we must strictly follow only those texts recognized as classic texts!»[Gallois] deriva de ahí su regla de lectura, que es de canon: seguir estrictamente solo los textos reconocidos como clásicos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«And it was just then, with benevolent concern, that Providence, judging no doubt that the moment had come to have the truth burst forth, descended upon a young woman who had always been haunted by this mystery and who was a member of our little spiritualist group in Grenoble.»[Gallois] sitúa el origen de la investigación en la Providencia y en su propio círculo, y declara de paso el vínculo desde el que escribe: Dubois era miembro del grupo espiritualista de Grenoble al que él pertenece.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«Embodying a limitless energy together with a tenacity and discernment worthy of Sherlock Holmes, she did not hesitate to mobilize all resources to reach her goal, exemplifying thereby the famous saying: “What woman wants, God wants.”»[Gallois] describe el método de la autora como pesquisa detectivesca y lo cierra con un refrán.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«Not stinting on the inevitable expenses that such an inquiry involves, our friend took many trips and established numerous and fruitful contacts, both in the provinces, in areas sometimes very distant from one another, and particularly in Paris, where sharp minds, won over by her endeavor, were quick to offer her their bibliographic skills and their support.»[Gallois] detalla de dónde sale el material: viajes costeados por ella, contactos en provincias y sobre todo en París, donde recibió ayuda bibliográfica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 7»

«difficulty of the task, our intuitive investigator managed fortuitously to meet certain involved families who, convinced of the sincerity of her undertaking, freely made available their textual and visual archives, going so far as to authorize the making of copies and photographic reproductions, a large number of which appear in this publication.»[Gallois] nombra la fuente de las láminas del volumen: familias implicadas que le abrieron sus archivos de texto e imagen y autorizaron copias y reproducciones fotográficas. El tramo arranca a media frase porque el cambio de plana la parte; empieza en la plana 7 con *Without letting herself become disconcerted by the scope and extreme*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 8»

«In conclusion, I consider it a duty to pay well-deserved homage to Geneviève Dubois, for her book, embellished with a lively style that is inlaid at times with felicitous turns of phrase, provides a very developed and ever-so-revealing synthesis that forms the crowning glory of all the efforts undertaken to arrive, finally and happily, at the conclusion of such a thankless, complex, and incredible inquiry.»[Gallois] rinde homenaje al libro y lo llama síntesis muy desarrollada y reveladora del conjunto de esfuerzos por cerrar la investigación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 8»

«Refusing to give away anything, even in part, concerning her work, and wanting not to overly tax the patience of the reader, I am anxious to let the author lead on from one surprise to the next.»[Gallois] declara que no adelanta nada del contenido y deja el relato a la autora.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 8»

«May this revelatory book enjoy the widest possible audience. That is the wish that is forming in my heart of hearts in concluding this humble preface for which Geneviève Dubois so kindly sought me out and which I have taken such pleasure in providing, despite my limited qualifications, because of our already long-standing, loyal, and solid friendship. Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.b VIRGIL, GEORGICS, 2:489 ROGER GALLOIS, SIMPLE CHILD OF THE SCIENCE»[Gallois] cierra el prólogo declarando que fue la propia Dubois quien se lo pidió y que lo escribe por amistad antigua, y firma bajo un epígrafe de las *Geórgicas* de Virgilio; la fórmula con que rubrica —hijo sencillo de la Ciencia— es la única identificación que el volumen da de él.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 8»

«Appendix J BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE WORKS OF RENÉ SCHWALLER DE LUBICZ (in order of publication) Étude sur les Nombres. Paris: Librairie de l’Art Indépendant, 1914. English edition, A Study of Numbers. Translated by Robert Lawlor. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1986.»[bibliografía] el apéndice J ordena por publicación la obra de Schwaller y abre con el estudio sobre los números de 1914, editado por la casa de Edmond Bailly que menciona la plana 40; la edición inglesa la publica la misma casa que edita este volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 107»

«Nécessité (by Aor). Paris: privately printed, 1918. ———. Adam, l’homme rouge. Paris: Librairie Stock, 1926. ———. Le Livre des vivants. Saint-Moritz: privately printed, 1926. ———. La Doctrine. Switzerland: Officina Montalia, 1927.»[bibliografía] los títulos de entreguerras de Schwaller, entre ellos el *Adam, l’homme rouge* de 1926 que Canseliet dice haber leído prestado en 1933 y que el propio Schwaller declara haber quemado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 107»

«Le Temple dans l’Homme. Cairo: Éditions Schindler, 1950. English edition, The Temple in Man. Translated by Robert and Deborah Lawlor. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1981. ———. Du Symbole et de le Symbolique. Cairo: Éditions Schindler, 1950. English edition, Symbol and the Symbolic. Translated by Robert and Deborah Lawlor. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1978.»[bibliografía] los dos títulos cairotas de 1950 con sus ediciones inglesas traducidas por Robert y Deborah Lawlor.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 107»

«Propos sur Ésotérisme et Symbole. Paris: Éditions La Colombe, 1960. English edition, Esoterism and Symbol. Translated by André and Goldian VandenBroeck. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1985. ———. Le Roi de la Théocratie Pharaonique. Paris: Éditions Flammarion, 1961. English edition, Sacred Science: The King of Pharaonic Theocracy. Translated by André and Goldian VandenBroeck. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1982.»[bibliografía] los títulos de 1960 y 1961, traducidos al inglés por André y Goldian VandenBroeck: el testigo principal del capítulo 5 es además traductor de Schwaller, y el dato queda a la vista aquí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 107»

«Les Temples de Karnak. Paris: Éditions Dervy, 1982. English edition, The Temples of Karnak. Photographs by Georges and Valentine de Miré. Translated by Jon Graham. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 1999. ———. Lettres à un disciple. Paris: Diffusion Traditionnelle, 1990.»[bibliografía] los dos últimos títulos, póstumos; el de Karnak lo publica Dervy, la misma casa que sacó el original francés de este volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 107»

«Appendix K A PARTIAL LIST OF BOOKS AND ARTICLES DISCUSSING FULCANELLI Albertus, Frater [Albert Riedel]. The Alchemist of the Rocky Mountains. Salt Lake City: Paracelsus Research Society, 1976.»[bibliografía] el apéndice K se declara lista parcial de lo escrito sobre Fulcanelli y abre por Frater Albertus, la fuente de la segunda transmutación de la plana 47.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 108»

«Amadou, Robert. Le Feu du Soleil: Entretien sur l’alchimie avec Eugène Canseliet. Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1978. ———. “L’Affaire Fulcanelli.” L’Autre Monde, nos. 74, 75, 76 (September–November 1983). Ambelain, Robert. “Dossier Fulcanelli.” Les Cahiers de la Tour-Saint-Jacques, no. 9. Paris, 1962.»[bibliografía] las tres piezas de Robert Amadou y Robert Ambelain, que son las fuentes más citadas del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 108»

«Atorène. Le Laboratoire Alchimique. Paris: Guy Trédaniel, 1981. Bechtel, Guy. “Entretien avec Eugène Canseliet sur Fulcanelli, suivi du Mystère Fulcanelli.” Privately printed. Blocmgracht, Amsterdam: Bibliotheca Philosophica Hermetica, 1974. Boucher, Jules. “La Croix d’Hendaye.” Consolation, nos. 26 and 37 (February 13 and April 30, 1936).»[bibliografía] registra el *Laboratoire Alchimique* de Atorène, del que sale la cronología del apéndice G, y da fechas y números al artículo de Jules Boucher sobre la cruz de Hendaya, que la plana 76 databa solo en 1936.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 108»

«Canseliet, Eugène. Alchimie. Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1964. ———. L’Alchimie expliquée sur ses textes classiques. Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1972. ———.L’Alchimie et son livre muet (Mutus Liber). Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1967. ———. Deux Logis alchimiques. Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1979. ———. Trois Anciens Traités d’alchimie. Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1975.»[bibliografía] los cinco títulos de Canseliet publicados por Pauvert; la fecha del *Deux Logis alchimiques* que da aquí, 1979, no coincide con la de 1945 en Schémit que da el apéndice G.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 108»

«Courjeaud, Frédéric. Fulcanelli: Une Identité révélée. Paris: C. Vigne, 1996. “Fulcanelli: Hypothèses et réflexions d’un ami de l’Étoile Polaire.” Initiation et Science (June 1962). Geyraud, Pierre. L’Occultisme à Paris. Paris: Éditions Paul, 1953.»[bibliografía] otros investigadores del caso —Frédéric Courjeaud, con un título que anuncia identidad revelada, y Pierre Geyraud— cuyas posiciones el volumen no discute aquí.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 108»

«Khaitzine, Richard. Fulcanelli et le Cabaret du Chat Noir: Histoire artistique, politique et secrète de Montmartre. Villeselve, France: Ramuel, 1997. Marly, Claude. “Le Langage secret des cathédrales.” Tout Savoir, no. 74 (July 1959). Martínez Otero, Luis Miguel. Fulcanelli: Una Biografía Imposible. Barcelona: Éditions Obelisco, 1986.»[bibliografía] Richard Khaitzine sobre Fulcanelli y el Chat Noir, y la biografía imposible de Luis Miguel Martínez Otero, publicada primero en español.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 109»

«Martínez Otero, Luis Miguel. Fulcanelli: Una Biografía Imposible. Barcelona: Éditions Obelisco, 1986. ———. Fulcanelli: Une Biographie impossible. Paris: Éditions Arista, 1989. Pauwels, Louis, and Jacques Bergier. Le Matin des Magiciens. Paris: Gallimard, 1960. English edition, The Morning of the Magicians. Translated by Rollo Myers. London: Neville Spearman, 1963.»[bibliografía] la versión francesa de Martínez Otero y *Le Matin des Magiciens* de Pauwels y Bergier, el libro que puso a Fulcanelli en circulación masiva.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 109»

«VandenBroeck, André. Al-Kemi, a Memoir: Hermetic, Occult, Political, and Private Aspects of R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz. Rochester, Vt., and Great Barrington, Mass.: Inner Traditions/Lindisfarne Press, 1987. Van Lennep, Jacques. Alchimie. Paris: Éditions Dervy, 1984. Weidner, Jay, and Vincent Bridges. The Mysteries of the Great Cross at Hendaye: Alchemy and the End of Time. Rochester, Vt.: Destiny Books, 2003.»[bibliografía] el *Al-Kemi* de VandenBroeck, fuente principal del capítulo 5, y el libro de Weidner y Bridges sobre la cruz de Hendaya, publicado por la misma casa que edita este volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 109»

«FOOTNOTES Foreword a [The term chrysopoeia is sometimes used to refer to the whole process of the transmutation of base metals into gold.—Trans.] b [“Happy is he who can understand the causes of things.” —Trans.]»[Cain, traductor] las dos primeras notas del volumen son suyas y van marcadas con la firma abreviada del traductor: glosan el término crisopeya y traducen el verso de Virgilio con que cierra el prólogo de Gallois.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«Chapter 1 a Count St. Germain, La Très Sainte-Trinosophie (Paris: Retz, 1971); from a manuscript preserved at the Troyes library (no. 2,400, in quarto, ninety-nine leaves written in a fine hand, twelve figures, twenty-four painted vignettes, and seven philosophical and magical figures made up of Hebrew letters).»[Dubois, nota] describe con precisión de catálogo el manuscrito de la *Très Sainte-Trinosophie* conservado en Troyes, con signatura, hojas, figuras y viñetas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«At the top of the work are two notes. The first is signed “J. B. C. Philotaume” and certifies that “this manuscript is the only existing copy of the famous trinosophy of Count St. Germain, which he himself destroyed on one of his journeys.”»[Dubois, nota] transcribe la primera de las dos notas de ese manuscrito, firmada Philotaume, que lo declara copia única de una obra que Saint-Germain habría destruido.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«The second note, unsigned, tells us that “this unusual manuscript is that which belonged to the famous Cagliostro and which was recovered by Masséna among the papers of the Grand Inquisitor.”»[Dubois, nota] transcribe la segunda nota, sin firma, que hace pasar el manuscrito por Cagliostro y por los papeles del Gran Inquisidor: dos certificaciones sobre un mismo objeto, ninguna de ellas comprobada.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«b It seems a manuscript copied in black, red, and green ink and signed “Rémi Pierret 1873” was found at the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris. We looked for it in vain.»[Dubois, nota] consigna una búsqueda negativa: el manuscrito firmado por Rémi Pierret que se dice en la Biblioteca Nacional no apareció.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«It supposedly dealt with an interesting “Collection of Alchemical Procedures” and contained among other things numerous alchemical experiments using “Nostoc or flos coeli.” At the end there was a recipe for “potable gold” extracted from a manuscript written in 1744 and two pen-and-ink figures. Information culled from Dorbon-Ainé, Bibliotheca Esoterica, 89.»[Dubois, nota] describe lo que ese manuscrito contendría según la *Bibliotheca Esoterica* de Dorbon-Ainé, y marca la descripción con *supposedly*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«c Papus is the pseudonym of Dr. Encausse and the name of the medical genius that Encausse had found in the translation of the Nuctemeron of Apollonius of Tyana, from the Greek with a commentary by Eliphas Lévi.»[Dubois, nota] descifra el seudónimo de Papus y lo remonta al *Nuctemeron* de Apolonio de Tiana en la traducción comentada de Éliphas Lévi.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«d Marc Haven is the pseudonym of Dr. Emmanuel Lalande, son-in-law of the lawyer Philippe de Lyon, thaumaturgist.»[Dubois, nota] descifra el seudónimo de Marc Haven y lo sitúa por parentesco junto a Philippe de Lyon.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«e Albert Poisson, Théorie et Symbole des Alchimistes (Paris: Éditions Chacornac, 1891). He left his library to Papus and Marc Haven. He was most certainly a pupil of Rémi Pierret, the shoemaker-cum-alchemist who had a career in Freemasonry.»[Dubois, nota] data en 1891 el tratado de Albert Poisson, consigna el legado de su biblioteca a Papus y a Marc Haven y lo hace discípulo del zapatero Rémi Pierret, con la reserva *most certainly*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«In the Voile d’Isis, Albert Poisson signed an article—“L’Alchimie à l’Institut,” relating the experiences of the American alchemist Carey Lea—with the pseudonym Philophotes (see Voile d’Isis, no. 69).»[Dubois, nota] descifra otro seudónimo, el Philophotes con que Poisson firmó un artículo sobre los experimentos del alquimista americano Carey Lea.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 110»

«f F. Ch. Barlet is the pseudonym of Albert Faucheux. The name Barlet is an anagram of Albert. g Sédir is the pseudonym of Yvon Le Loup.»[Dubois, nota] descifra los seudónimos de Barlet y de Sédir, y señala que el primero es anagrama del nombre de pila: la cábala fonética funciona aquí como llave de identidades reales.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«h [Tiers-Ordre (Third Order) is a term used to denote an association of devout adherents of the Catholic Church who, although they live in the world, are associated with a religious order.—Trans.]»[Cain, traductor] explica al lector anglófono qué es una tercera orden católica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«i At the time, Papus was engaged in the study of medicine and was carrying out his military service. He had been drawn to alchemy by reading the works of Louis Lucas: La Chimie Nouvelle (The New Chemistry), 1854; Le Roman Alchimique (The Alchemical Novel), the publication of which began in no. 14 of the Voile d’Isis and later appeared in 1857 as a book; and La Médecine Nouvelle (The New Medicine), 1862.»[Dubois, nota] atribuye la afición alquímica de Papus a la lectura de Louis Lucas y da los tres títulos con sus fechas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«j Émile Goudeau was the founder of Les Hydropathes. His major work is La Revanche des Bêtes (The Revenge of the Beasts). The launching of the cabaret Le Chat Noir in Montmartre arose from the meeting of the painter Rodolphe Salis and Émile Goudeau.»[Dubois, nota] hace nacer el Chat Noir del encuentro entre el pintor Rodolphe Salis y Émile Goudeau, fundador de Les Hydropathes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«Thus, with a black cat serving as its sign, the most prestigious cabaret of the era opened its doors in 1881. Details drawn from Miroir de l’Histoire, no. 206 (February 1967).»[Dubois, nota] data en 1881 la apertura del cabaret y remite a un artículo de *Miroir de l’Histoire*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«k Tiffereau, L’Or et la Transmutation des Métaux (Gold and the Transmutation of Metals, Paris: n.p., n.d.). The transmutation that he carried out in Mexico in 1842 caused a stir in all sectors of the society of those times.»[Dubois, nota] da el libro de Tiffereau sin lugar ni fecha y data en 1842 la transmutación mexicana; la cronología del apéndice A da ese mismo año.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«m Henri Delage was born in 1825 and died in 1882 and is the author of numerous books, among them Initiation au magnétisme (Initiation to Magnetism), 1847, and Doctrine des Sociétés Secrètes (Doctrine of Secret Societies), 1852.»[Dubois, nota] da fechas y dos títulos de Henri Delage, el eslabón de quien Papus decía haber recibido la iniciación martinista.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«n [A theriac is a cure-all or antidote to a poison. —Ed.] o [The last grand master of the Knights Templar, burned as a heretic in 1314.—Ed.]»[editor] dos notas firmadas por la redacción y no por el traductor, que glosan la triaca y a Jacques de Molay.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 111»

«p In Fulcanelli, Les Demeures Philosophales, volume 1, the chapter on the hermetic cabala ascribes to Palingenesia (referring to Marcel Palingène) the meaning of regeneration. “In order to designate the regeneration of the sun or of gold, using iron.”»[Dubois, nota] localiza en el capítulo de la cábala hermética de *Les Demeures* la lectura de Palingenesia como regeneración, que es la clave del nombre iniciático de Guénon en la plana 17.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«The translation maintains the distinction made in the French between the Hebrew Kabbalah and the species of esoteric wordplay and double entendre that is known as the phonetic or hermetic cabala.—Ed.]»[editor] declara una decisión de traducción que gobierna el volumen entero: se conserva la distinción francesa entre la cábala hebrea y el juego de palabras esotérico llamado cábala fonética o hermética.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«q The Swedenborgian Rite maintained close relations with Memphis-Misraïm Freemasonry. John Yarker was the grand master of the Supreme Grand Lodge of the Temple of the Swedenborgian Rite. As early as 1893 he had applied for admission to the inner circle of Martinism.»[Dubois, nota] enlaza el rito swedenborgiano con Memphis-Misraim por John Yarker y data en 1893 su solicitud al círculo interior del martinismo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«Papus’s application for admission was rejected under pressure from Abel Thomas. Information drawn from Serge Caillet, Franc-Maçonnerie Égyptienne de Memphis-Misraïm (Paris, 1988).»[Dubois, nota] consigna el rechazo de la solicitud de Papus por presión de Abel Thomas y remite a Serge Caillet.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«r In the journal Ignis for 1925, Arturo Reghini provides a commentary on the text “Lux Obnubilata” (Light Moving Out from Darkness on Its Own) published in facsimile reproduction by Arché in Milan in 1968. The original edition is from 1666, published by Zatta, Venice.»[Dubois, nota] traza la cadena editorial del *Lux Obnubilata* desde la edición veneciana de 1666 hasta el facsímil milanés de 1968, pasando por el comentario de Reghini de 1925.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«Arturo Reghini attributes the Ode to Philalèthe [Thomas Vaughan (1622–66), who wrote under the name Eugenius Philalethes].»[Dubois, nota] recoge la atribución de la Oda que hace Reghini y el corchete identifica al Filaleteo con Thomas Vaughan.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«t Ercole Quadrelli was the author of an Italian translation of the alchemical treatise Chymica Vannus.»[Dubois, nota] identifica a Ercole Quadrelli, el Abraxas del grupo Ur, como traductor italiano del *Chymica Vannus*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«u Alexandre Rouhier’s book De l’Architecture Naturelle (Concerning Natural Architecture), which he principally authored with the participation of Marcel Nicaud, was published by Véga. He was also the author of La Plante qui fait les yeux émerveillés—le peyolt (The Plant That Fills the Eyes with Marvels—Peyote) published by Doin in 1927.»[Dubois, nota] da los dos libros de Rouhier, entre ellos el de 1927 sobre el peyote.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«b L. Faugeron was the laboratory helper of Pierre Dujols, who, being ill, could not work himself.»[Dubois, nota] precisa el papel de Faugeron: ayudante de laboratorio del Dujols enfermo, que ya no podía trabajar por su mano.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«After Dujols’s death, Faugeron continued his research, sacrificing everything to buy charcoal and alchemical books. Some say he died of hunger, in total destitution, without having attained the realization of his efforts.»[Dubois, nota] cuenta el final de Faugeron, arruinado comprando carbón y libros, y marca como rumor la muerte de hambre: *some say*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 112»

«Contrary to what can be found in print, Pierre Dujols held that laboratory work was essential. He replied one day to his friend Paul Le Cour, who considered alchemy an inner discipline, “that he was completely wrong and that it was impossible to understand intellectual hermetic science without working on material substances, that hermetic terminology cannot be correlated with scientific terminology.”»[Dubois, nota] objeta lo impreso sobre Dujols y transcribe su respuesta a Paul Le Cour: el trabajo de laboratorio es imprescindible y la terminología hermética no se deja correlacionar con la científica. La nota niega la lectura interiorista de la alquimia, y lo hace citando a Dujols contra un amigo suyo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«c On February 23, 1925, Pierre Dujols wrote the following letter, which summarizes the file that had been passed on to him from Paul Le Cour concerning the famous Hiéron du Val d’Or:»[Dubois, nota] data el 23 de febrero de 1925 la carta de Dujols a Le Cour sobre el Hiéron du Val d’Or, cuyo pasaje central cita el cuerpo del libro en la plana 28 tomándolo de *Charivari*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«Dear Sir and Friend: I have begun the study of the two notebooks that you have passed on to me. We do learn something from them. Not only do the Adherents of Hiéron promote themselves as Templars and Knights of the Grail, but furthermore, they proclaim themselves “Apostles of the Final Times,” those who were called for by the Virgin of la Salette in a secret connected with the Holy See.»[Dujols a Le Cour, 1925] resume lo que halla en los cuadernos: los adherentes del Hiéron se dicen templarios, caballeros del Grial y apóstoles de los últimos tiempos anunciados por la Virgen de la Salette.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«Indeed, the promoters of this crusade boast of possessing Knowledge. There is some truth in these claims, but to what extent?»[Dujols a Le Cour, 1925] concede algo de verdad a esa pretensión de conocimiento y deja la medida en pregunta abierta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«The Adherents of Hiéron was also called the Société du Règne (Society of the Reign) or Société des Fastes (Society of the Glorious). This group was formed in 1875 by the Jesuit Drevon at Paray-le-Monial. His avowed purpose was to prove the reality of the reign of Christ and to prepare for his coming at the end of this cycle.»[Dubois, nota] data en 1875 la fundación del Hiéron por el jesuita Drevon en Paray-le-Monial y declara su fin: probar la realidad del reino de Cristo y preparar su venida al cabo del ciclo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«Christianity was considered the flowering of the Primordial Tradition transmitted by the Atlanteans, according to Jacques d’Arès. On this topic, also see Félix de Rosnay, Le Hiéron du Val d’Or (Paray-le-Monial, 1900).»[Dubois, nota] atribuye a Jacques d’Arès la lectura del cristianismo como floración de una Tradición Primordial transmitida por los atlantes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«Father Victor Drevon organized pilgrimages to Paray-le-Monial. In 1873, he met Baron Alexis de Sarachaga and, before his death in Rome in 1880, entrusted to him the task of founding the Société du Règne Social de Jésus-Christ (Society of the Reign of Jesus Christ in Society), the aim of which, in relation to the revelations of Sainte Marguerite-Marie, was “to offer to Jesus Christ the Host social reparations that he claimed himself at Paray in 1869.”»[Dubois, nota] traza la sucesión del Hiéron de Drevon al barón de Sarachaga y transcribe el fin declarado de su sociedad, ligado a las revelaciones de Margarita María.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«Baron de Sarachaga, supporter of the claims to the French throne by Karl William Naundorff, devoted his efforts to the elaboration of Hiéron, a center from which would spread forth for forty years strange, millennial, hermetic doctrines. See Marie-France James, Ésotérisme et Christianisme autour de René Guénon (Esotericism and Christianity around René Guénon, Paris: Nouvelles Éditions Latines, 1981).»[Dubois, nota] enlaza al barón de Sarachaga con la causa dinástica de Naundorff y con cuarenta años de doctrinas milenaristas y herméticas: la misma mezcla de pretensión dinástica y hermetismo que documenta en la familia Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«d [In English, a hypotyposis, which Webster’s Third defines as a “vivid, picturesque description.”—Ed.] e [Nostoc is a kind of freshwater blue-green alga. —Ed.]»[editor] dos notas de la redacción que glosan la hipotiposis con el diccionario de Webster y el nostoc como alga de agua dulce.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 113»

«François de Valois, duke of Alençon and brother of the former duke, also would have married in a foreign country. In 1575, he married Jeanne de Medina Coeli in Spain. Under Louis XV, the descendants of this marriage are to be found in France in the person of Charles-Louis de Valois. He died at the Bastille and his wife became insane.»[Éric Muraise, citado en nota por Dubois] resume la pretensión Valois de los Dujols en condicional —*would have married*— y sigue la línea hasta un Charles-Louis de Valois muerto en la Bastilla.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«In admitting the reality of the Polish marriage and the Spanish marriage of our two Valois, we must be clear that their civil and monarchic values were not the same. If they were legitimate, they were definitely not authorized, which would be enough to exclude their offspring from royal succession.»[Muraise, citado por Dubois] concede la realidad de los dos matrimonios y a la vez niega su efecto: legítimos pero no autorizados, lo que bastaría para excluir a la descendencia de la sucesión real. La ficha conserva la ortografía *definitely* con ligadura tal como la imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«Author’s note: The reference to the “Polish marriage” relates to the brother of François de Valois, Henri III, who would have entered into two marriages—one in 1573 with a Polish woman and the other with Louise de Vaudémont.»[Dubois, nota dentro de la cita] explica a qué matrimonio polaco alude Muraise, el de Enrique III en 1573.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«h Madame Dujols was born in the département of Morbihan on February 2, 1868, at 2:00 A.M. on the rue Neuve in Hennebont. She was the daughter of Nicolas Joseph Charton, fifty-three (civil servant in charge of road maintenance), and Caroline Perrine Leroux, thirty-five (no profession). She died in Paris in the 7th arrondissement on October 8, 1954. Her sister Anna became a nun with the Sisters of Clare at Millhill near London, using the name Sister Clothilde.»[Dubois, nota] documenta a la mujer de Dujols por su partida de nacimiento de 1868 en Hennebont, con los nombres y oficios de sus padres, y da su muerte en 1954.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«i The brother of Alexandre-Albéric Thomas (known as Marnès), whose name was Abel Thomas, grand master of the Order of Memphis-Misraïm, continued to oppose the regular admission of Papus to Freemasonry. He notes this in an article that appeared in the January 1907 issue of the journal Acacia.»[Dubois, nota] documenta en un artículo de 1907 la oposición sostenida de Abel Thomas al ingreso regular de Papus en la masonería.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«j The following biography of Grasset d’Orcet is drawn from Matériaux cryptographiques, vol. 1, collected and arranged by Bernard Allieu and A. Barthélémy. Born on June 6, 1828, at Aurillac in the Cantal region, d’Orcet engaged in the study of classics at Clermont-Ferrand, then at Juilly (département Seine-et-Marne) and graduated in law in Paris, where he was a regular at the workshop of a sculptor from whom he acquired a good understanding of art. Upon the death of his father, he undertook a study tour of the Mediterranean, at the end of which he settled in Cyprus. There he studied the remnants of cryptographic systems of ancient Greece.»[Dubois, nota] declara de dónde toma la biografía de Grasset d’Orcet y la resume hasta su estancia en Chipre estudiando los restos de los sistemas criptográficos griegos.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«In December 1873, the Revue Britannique accepted an initial article from him, which was the beginning of an abundant and varied series. Over a period of twenty-seven years, he produced 160 articles on a diverse range of topics, some reaching, in the case of the longest ones, two hundred pages.»[Dubois, nota] cifra en 160 los artículos de d’Orcet en la *Revue Britannique* a lo largo de veintisiete años.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«Removing himself from the world, d’Orcet devoted his life to labors that were truly monastic. He died at Cusset (département Allier) on December 2, 1900.»[Dubois, nota] cierra esa biografía con el retiro monástico de d’Orcet y su muerte en Cusset en 1900.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 114»

«k The 46th Infantry Regiment was garrisoned not in Paris but in Caen—according to the yearbook of the army for the year 1843 and according to L’Historique du 46e Régiment d’Infanterie by Chaperon, in the archives at Vincennes.»[Dubois, nota] enmienda por dos fuentes de archivo el dato del pasaje de Fulcanelli citado en la plana 35: el 46.º de infantería estaba de guarnición en Caen y no en París.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«l Abbé H. Boudet, La Vraie Langue Celtique et le Cromleck de Rennes-les-Bains (Paris: Belfond, 1978), privately printed by the abbé in 1880 in an edition of three hundred copies.»[Dubois, nota] data en 1880 la edición privada de trescientos ejemplares del libro de Boudet, con su reedición parisina de 1978.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«We should note that as a correction to the accepted history, Saint-Vincent-de-Paul stayed at Limoux, near Notre-Dame-de-Marceille, and not at Marseilles.»[Dubois, nota] enmienda otro dato recibido: la estancia de San Vicente de Paúl fue en Limoux y no en Marsella.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«b Félix Gaboriau was born in 1861 and died in 1911. He had devoted his time and his small inheritance to the publication of a theosophical journal, Le Lotus.»[Dubois, nota] da fechas a Gaboriau, iniciador de Champagne, y consigna que gastó su herencia en una revista teosófica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«c Moreover, during their long collaboration, they did not think much of each other, satisfied only with making the best use of each other’s competencies.»[Dubois, nota] califica la relación entre Champagne y Schwaller de aprovechamiento mutuo de competencias, sin estima recíproca: es la lectura menos heroica posible del vínculo que sostiene el libro.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«The author befriended Schwaller, who, in turn, told him all the details of this surprising story.»[Dubois, nota] declara la vía por la que le llega casi todo lo de ese vínculo: la amistad de VandenBroeck con Schwaller.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«According to the description that Schwaller gave to André VandenBroeck, the manuscript was written on stiff paper from a sketchbook, cut in octavo, yellowing at the edges. The ink was a blackish brown but had withstood the passage of time, and the leaves were soiled with spots of oil.»[Dubois, nota] transmite por VandenBroeck la descripción física del manuscrito robado —papel de cuaderno de dibujo, tinta pardusca, manchas de aceite—, que es lo más cerca que el libro llega del objeto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«d In Pauwels and Bergier’s Le Matin des Magiciens (Paris: Gallimard, 1960; English edition, The Morning of the Magicians, New York: Dorset Press, 1988), there is a conversation referred to between Bergier and an alchemist in a gas-testing laboratory in Paris. The researcher conveys to Bergier his warning about the nuclear reactor.»[Dubois, nota] localiza en *Le Matin des Magiciens* la conversación de Bergier con un alquimista de un laboratorio de gas de París y la advertencia sobre el reactor nuclear.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«Robert Amadou in his series of articles on the Fulcanelli affair in L’Autre Monde (1983) discloses that Jacques Bergier, “after learning that he was terminally ill,” confided to him that Fulcanelli was Schwaller de Lubicz.»[Dubois, nota] consigna en nota, y sin comentarla, una adjudicación distinta de la suya: la de Bergier a Amadou, que identificaba a Fulcanelli con Schwaller y no con Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«e On page 3 of his “Hypotypose,” Pierre Dujols includes an error: He writes that Dr. Girtaner declared that in the twentieth century the Chrysopoeia would be in the public domain. According to Father Migne, in his Dictionnaire des Sciences Occultes (1848), volume 2, column 315, the article on the philosopher’s stone: “Dr. Girtaner of Göttingen recently ventured to predict that in the nineteenth century the transmutation of metals would generally be known.”»[Dubois, nota] enmienda a Dujols en su propia *Hypotypose*: donde él pone el siglo XX, el diccionario de Migne cita a Girtaner prediciendo la transmutación para el XIX.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«f Serge Voronoff was the director of the laboratories at the Collège de France. In 1930, he investigated a technique of applying grafts from monkey testicles in pursuit of a “cure” for aging. He published his results: 475 grafts!»[Dubois, nota] identifica a Voronoff como director de los laboratorios del Collège de France y data en 1930 sus injertos de testículo de mono contra el envejecimiento: al hombre a quien Champagne convenció de que tenía la Crisopeya lo movía la misma busca de longevidad.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 115»

«comments that we have added are from notes taken during conversations with our dear departed master and friend, Fulcanelli.”»[Jules Boucher, citado en nota por Dubois] declara que sus añadidos vienen de conversaciones con su maestro y amigo Fulcanelli, a quien da por muerto: el testimonio de un tercer discípulo que trató al personaje. El tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana y empieza en la 115.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«h [The term projection is used to refer to the catalytic event that triggers the transmutation of base metals.—Trans.]»[Cain, traductor] glosa el término proyección como el suceso catalítico que dispara la transmutación.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«i André Savoret (1898–1977), a friend of Eugène Canseliet and of Georges Richet and the alchemist known by the pseudonym Auriger, displayed an interest in druidism, having been influenced by the great thaumaturgist Philéas Lebesgue. He created the Collège Bardique des Gaules and was the author of numerous books: Du Menhir à la Croix: Essais sur la triple tradition de l’Occident (From the Menhir to the Cross: Essays on the Triple Tradition of the West, 1932); translations of La Nuée sur le Sanctuaire (Clouds over the Sanctuary) and Essais chimiques de Eckartshausen (Chemical Essays of Eckartshausen); Les Forces Secrètes de la Vie (The Secret Forces of Life, 1937); L’Inversion Psychanalytique (The Psychoanalytical Inversion, 1939); and Visages du druidisme (Faces of Druidism).»[Dubois, nota] retrata a André Savoret, amigo de Canseliet y testigo citado en la plana 46, por su druidismo y su bibliografía.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«j The movement, called Les Veilleurs [begun in 1920 by Schwaller de Lubicz], included as well an inner circle called the Ordre d’Elie (Order of Eli).»[Dubois, nota] consigna un círculo interior de Les Veilleurs llamado Ordre d’Elie, que explicaría el nombre ELIE de la dedicatoria de la plana 47.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«k In the book by Alexandre de Danam, Mémoire du Sang (Milan: Arché, 1990), on page 91, we learn that the mystical name of René Schwaller was “Aor, “or more precisely” Aor Mahomet Ahliah,” in order to establish a connection to the pseudonym of the alchemist Dina: A. M. A.»[Dubois, nota] recoge de Alexandre de Danam una forma larga del nombre místico de Schwaller que coincidiría en iniciales con el seudónimo del alquimista Dina; las comillas descolocadas son las que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«l In 1896, Alberic Thomas was honorary officer “G. des SC.” of the Grand Misraïm Lodge (Egyptian Masonry) located at 42 rue Rochechouart, while he himself lived at 10 rue Durand-Claye. In 1896, at this number of this street, we find four of the thirty-nine active members of this lodge.»[Dubois, nota] documenta en 1896 la posición de Albéric Thomas en la logia Misraim y la concentración de cuatro de sus treinta y nueve miembros activos en un mismo número de calle.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«m [In translating the French sel here to the corresponding English word salt, we would further obscure the underlying meaning. Fulcanelli in Le Mystère des Cathédrales notes that the French sel is a homophone of scel, meaning “seal.”—Trans.]»[Cain, traductor] declara por qué deja *sel* sin traducir: Fulcanelli hace de esa palabra homófona de *scel*, sello, y el juego se perdería en inglés. Es la cábala fonética imponiendo una decisión de traducción.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«n The chemist Mr. Coton-Alvart always maintained that Le Mystère des Cathédrales was written by Pierre Dujols. He had seen it at Dujols’s home.»[Dubois, nota] consigna un testimonio que adjudica *Le Mystère* a Dujols solo, y no a Champagne: Coton-Alvart decía haber visto el libro en casa de Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«o According to Isha’s disciple Th. C., it was Schwaller, not Champagne, who labored in the laboratory to accomplish this decisive operation. She also recalls that during his stay in Egypt, René Schwaller had been present at a transmutation carried out by an African alchemist on the border of Nubia (now northeastern Sudan).»[Dubois, nota] recoge una tercera versión del experimento decisivo, la de la discípula de Isha, que lo atribuye a Schwaller y no a Champagne; la misma testigo sitúa a Schwaller en una transmutación egipcia hecha por un alquimista africano. Las versiones quedan las tres en pie.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«q Section D, Number 45, Cemetery of Arnouville-les-Gonesse (Seine-et-Oise). In his offprint “La Tour Saint-Jacques” (1962), Mr. Robert Ambelain puts the death of J.-J. Champagne in Paris in the Broussais Hospital, though in a later letter addressed to me he willingly takes note of his mistake, saying his information had come from Jules Boucher, who, it turns out, was at Saint-Étienne at the time of his master Champagne’s death.»[Dubois, nota] da la ubicación exacta de la tumba de Champagne y consigna una enmienda encajada: Ambelain, que había situado la muerte en el hospital Broussais, reconoce por carta a Dubois su error y remonta el dato a Jules Boucher, ausente de París en esa fecha.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«I am obliged here to make a brief parenthetical remark in order to warn the reader against the intellectual deception of those who claim to be Frères d’Héliopolis (Brothers of Heliopolis) or who claim the existence of Fulcanelli. On this subject, thanks to Jacques Bergier, Lucien Carny, Jean Haab, and Robert Ambelain, I am in possession of»[Jean-Luc Chaumeil, citado en nota por Dubois] advierte al lector contra quienes se dicen Hermanos de Heliópolis o afirman la existencia de Fulcanelli, y nombra a Bergier, Carny, Haab y Ambelain por informantes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 116»

«indications that allow us to state without reservation: ‘Fulcanelli no more existed than did the Marquis de B—.’ All that is part of a modern, now-classic, obfuscation, which takes the reader to be an idiot or someone quite gullible.”»[Chaumeil, citado por Dubois] niega sin reservas la existencia de Fulcanelli y trata el asunto de embaucamiento moderno; el tramo arranca a media frase por el cambio de plana, que empieza en la 116.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 117»

«Jean-Luc Chaumeil, Le Trésor des Templiers (Paris: Connaissance de l’Étrange, Henri Veyrier, 1984), 223.»[Dubois, nota] da la referencia exacta de esa posición de Chaumeil, con página.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 117»

«See also what Paul de Saint-Hilaire has written in his Atlas du Mystère (Luxembourg: RTL Éditions, 1985), 211: “These two works have certainly been at the basis of a renewing of alchemy. However, based on elements that had been assembled by a scholar who knew his material perfectly well, the text seems to have been rewritten by a third party and artificially stuffed with obscure facts drawn from the jumble of certain grimoires. To be read with caution and discernment.”»[Paul de Saint-Hilaire, citado en nota por Dubois] concede a los dos libros el mérito de renovar la alquimia y a la vez sostiene que el material lo reunió un erudito y lo reescribió un tercero, atiborrándolo de datos oscuros: es la misma estructura de autoría que propone Dubois, dicha por otra mano.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 117»

«b However, it should be pointed out that the oldest references to the alchemical activities of Nicolas Flamel appear about fifty years after his death.»[Dubois, nota] data en unos cincuenta años después de su muerte las referencias más antiguas a la actividad alquímica de Flamel.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 117»

«c According to the most accepted opinion on the twelfth century, this statue, which is found rather frequently at the entrance of churches in Poitou, represents the emperor Constantine driving out paganism. See Émile Mâle, L’Art religieux du XIIe siècle en France (Religious Art in Twelfth-Century France).»[Dubois, nota] opone a la lectura del jinete de Melle como Caballero del Apocalipsis la opinión corriente entre medievalistas, que ve en él a Constantino expulsando al paganismo, y remite a Émile Mâle.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 117»

«NOTES Foreword 1. Fulcanelli, Le Mystère des Cathédrales, translated by Mary Sworder (Suffolk, U.K.: Neville Spearman, 1971). French editions: 1926, 1957, 1964.»[notas] la primera referencia del volumen es a la traducción inglesa de Mary Sworder de *Le Mystère des Cathédrales*, con las tres ediciones francesas: es la misma edición inglesa fichada en el corpus como `fulcanelli-mystery-of-the-cathedrals`.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 118»

«2. Fulcanelli, Dwellings of the Philosophers, translated by Brigitte Donvez and Lionel Perrin (Boulder, Colo.: Archive Press and Communications, 1999). French editions of Les Demeures Philosophales: 1930, 1960, 1977.»[notas] la traducción inglesa de *Les Demeures Philosophales* por Donvez y Perrin, publicada en 1999, con las tres ediciones francesas; corresponde a la ficha `fulcanelli-dwellings-of-the-philosophers`.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 118»

«3. Eugène Canseliet, Alchimie expliquée sur les textes classiques (Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1972). 4. Claude Lablatinière d’Ygé, Nouvelle Assemblée des philosophes chymiques (Paris: Éditions Dervy, 1954). 5. “Épistola Hermetica V,” Atlantis, no. 291 (1977).»[notas] las tres fuentes que el prólogo de Gallois cita como autoridades, con año y editorial; la *Épistola Hermetica* que él data sin año sale aquí en el número 291 de Atlantis, de 1977.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 118»

«Chapter 1 1. Dom A. J. Pernety, Dictionnaire Mytho-Hermétique (Paris, 1758); republished by Arché (Milan, 1971). Also, ibid., Fables Égyptiennes et Grecques (Paris, 1786); republished by La Table d’Émeraude (Paris, 1982). 2. Abbé Nicolas Lenglet-Dufresnoy, Histoire de la Philosophie Hermétique (Paris: Coustelier, 1742).»[notas] las obras de Pernety y de Lenglet-Dufresnoy con sus fechas de imprenta y de reedición moderna.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 118»

«5. Anonymous, Hermès Dévoilé, dédié à la Postérité (Paris: Félix Locquin, 1832). 6. Related in Jacques Sadoul, Le Grand Art de l’alchimie (Paris: J’ai Lu no. 329, 1973), and C. Burland, Le Savoir caché des alchimistes (Paris: R. Laffont, 1967).»[notas] la ficha bibliográfica del *Hermès Dévoilé* lo registra como anónimo, sin el nombre de Cyliani que la plana 29 discute.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 118»

«3. Fulcanelli, Les Demeures Philosophales, vol. 1 (Paris: Édition Pauvert, 1965), chapter 2, regarding Louis d’Estissac, and page 246, regarding the letter X.»[notas] remite a capítulo y página de *Les Demeures* para las anotaciones de Fulcanelli sobre el letrero del Chat Noir.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 118»

«9. Anonymous, H.B. of L., Textes et documents secrets de la Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor (Milan: Arché, 1988). 10. Ibid. 11. P. B. Randolph, Magia Sexualis (Sexual Magic; Paris: Guy le Prat, 1969).»[notas] la documentación de la Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor y la *Magia Sexualis* de Randolph en sus ediciones modernas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 119»

«2. Esprit Gobineau de Montluisant, Explication très curieuse des énigmes et figures hiéroglyphiques, physiques, qui sont au grand portail de l’Église Cathédrale et Métropolitaine de Notre-Dame-de-Paris. Eugène Canseliet provided this document for us along with two others in his book Trois Anciens Traités d’alchimie (Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1975).»[notas] da el título largo del tratado de Gobineau de Montluisant sobre el pórtico de Notre-Dame y anota que el propio Canseliet lo facilitó y lo reeditó en sus *Trois Anciens Traités*.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 119»

«7. Magophon, Le Livre d’Images sans Paroles (Mutus Liber), (Paris: Librairie Nourry, 1914).»[notas] la ficha del *Mutus Liber* de Magophon fecha en 1914 la edición de Nourry, la misma que el obituario del apéndice E llama única obra escrita de Dujols.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 119»

«4. See Betty J. Teeter Dobbs, Les Fondements de l’Alchimie de Newton ou la chasse au lion vert (Paris: Guy Trédaniel, 1981). Translated from the English. Original English title: The Foundations of Newton’s Alchemy, or “The Hunting of the Greene Lyon” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).»[notas] remite al estudio de Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs sobre la alquimia de Newton a propósito del ejemplar en que Champagne halló el manuscrito.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 120»

«6. Voyages en kaléidoscope, Irène Hillel-Erlanger, introduction and notes by Jean Laplace (Paris: Éditions de la Tourbe, 1977). Another edition appeared in 1984 from Éditions de la Table d’Émeraude, with a remarkable preface by Mr. Coia-Gatie.»[notas] las dos ediciones modernas de los *Voyages en kaléidoscope*, con sus prologuistas.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 120»

«14. André VandenBroeck, Al-Kemi, a Memoir: Hermetic, Occult, Political, and Private Aspects of R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz (Rochester, Vt., and Great Barrington, Mass.: Inner Traditions/Lindisfarne Press, 1987), 74.»[notas] localiza en la página 74 de *Al-Kemi* la frase de Schwaller sobre sus ideas tomadas: la pieza mayor de la tesis tiene referencia exacta.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 121»

«17. Les Demeures Philosophales et le Symbolisme Hermétique dans Ses Rapports avec l’Art Sacré et l’Ésotérisme du Grand Oeuvre, 2 vols. (Paris: Jean Schémit, 1930), with a preface by Eugène Canseliet, F.C.H. Text illustrated with forty plates based on drawings by Julien Champagne.»[notas] la ficha de la primera edición de *Les Demeures* declara las dos manos que el volumen lleva impresas: el prefacio de Canseliet y las cuarenta láminas basadas en dibujos de Champagne.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 121»

«3. Amadou, Feu du Soleil, 122, 121, 129. 4. Kenneth Rayner Johnson, The Fulcanelli Phenomenon (Jersey: Neville Spearman, 1980).»[notas] da las tres páginas del *Feu du Soleil* de donde salen los pasajes cosidos de la plana 75, y la referencia de Rayner Johnson.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 121»

«5. Miss Moberly and Miss Jourdain, Les Fantômes de Trianon (Paris: Éditions du Rocher, 1959), with a preface by Jean Cocteau and an introduction by Robert Amadou.»[notas] la edición francesa de los Fantasmas del Trianón, prologada por Cocteau y presentada por Robert Amadou, el mismo entrevistador de Canseliet.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 121»

«ABOUT THE AUTHOR Geneviève Dubois, author of several books in French on alchemical and Hermetic studies, is a member of the ARK’ALL Foundation devoted to the study of operative alchemy.»[solapa] la única identificación que el volumen da de su autora: escritora de varios libros franceses de estudios alquímicos y herméticos y miembro de la ARK’ALL Foundation, dedicada a la alquimia operativa. La adscripción a la alquimia operativa acompaña la posición que el libro toma contra las lecturas espiritualizantes.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 122»

«ABOUT INNER TRADITIONS • BEAR & COMPANY Founded in 1975, Inner Traditions is a leading publisher of books on indigenous cultures, perennial philosophy, visionary art, spiritual traditions of the East and West, sexuality, holistic health and healing, self-development, as well as recordings of ethnic music and accompaniments for meditation.»[editorial] la casa se presenta por su catálogo, de las culturas indígenas y la filosofía perenne a la salud holística y las grabaciones de música étnica: el marco comercial en que este volumen se publica.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 123»

«In July 2000, Bear & Company joined with Inner Traditions and moved from Santa Fe, New Mexico, where it was founded in 1980, to Rochester, Vermont.»[editorial] data en julio de 2000 la unión con Bear & Company y el traslado a Rochester, la dirección que imprime la portada.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 123»

«Books of Related Interest The Mysteries of the Great Cross of Hendaye Alchemy and the End of Time by Jay Weidner and Vincent Bridges Esoterism and Symbol by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz»[editorial] la lista de títulos afines abre por el libro de Weidner y Bridges sobre la cruz de Hendaya y por Schwaller de Lubicz: la casa vende en el mismo catálogo al autor que este volumen sitúa detrás del seudónimo.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 124»

«The Hermetic Tradition Symbols and Teachings of the Royal Art by Julius Evola The Mystery Traditions Secret Symbols and Sacred Art by James Wasserman The Occult Conspiracy Secret Societies—Their Influence and Power in World History by Michael Howard Walkers Between the Worlds The Western Mysteries from Shaman to Magus by Caitlín and John Matthews»[editorial] el resto de la lista, con Evola —el mismo del grupo Ur de la plana 18—, Wasserman, Michael Howard y los Matthews.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 124»

«Destiny Books One Park Street Rochester, Vermont 05767 www.InnerTraditions.com Destiny Books is a division of Inner Traditions International»[derechos] la plana de derechos, que en este EPUB es la última y no la del principio, identifica a Destiny Books como división de Inner Traditions International con domicilio en Rochester.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 125»

«All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.»[derechos] la reserva de derechos habitual del sello.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 125»

«Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dubois, Geneviève. [Fulcanelli dévoilé. English] Fulcanelli and the alchemical revival : the man behind the Mystery of the cathedrals / Geneviève Dubois ; translated by Jack Cain.—1st U.S. ed.»[derechos] la ficha de catalogación registra a Dubois como autora, declara el original francés *Fulcanelli dévoilé* entre corchetes y da a Jack Cain por traductor: es la base de la atribución declarada del encabezado.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 125»

«1. Fulcanelli, pseud. Mystère des cathédrals. 2. Alchemists—France—Biography. 3. Alchemy—France—History. I. Title. QD24.A2D8313 2006»[derechos] los encabezamientos de materia de la Library of Congress registran a Fulcanelli como seudónimo y clasifican el libro entre las biografías de alquimistas franceses y la historia de la alquimia en Francia; la grafía *cathédrals* es la que imprime la capa de texto.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 125»

«With thanks to C. J. Faust, Mrs. Duhamel, the family of Pierre Dujols, Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Finot, and also, of course, the Saturday morning philosophers»[agradecimientos] la dedicatoria nombra a C. J. Faust, a la familia Dujols y a los Finot, es decir a las familias que abrieron sus archivos según el prólogo, y cierra con los filósofos del sábado por la mañana.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 3»

«K. A Partial List of Books and Articles Discussing Fulcanelli Footnotes Notes About the Author About Inner Traditions Books of Related Interest Copyright»[contenidos] la segunda plana del índice cierra la lista de apéndices y enumera el aparato final del volumen.

Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006)«Dubois — Fulcanelli and the Alchemical Revival (2006) · p. 5»

Concepts treated

Piedra filosofal (lapis philosophorum)Objeto de la busca que el libro historia; el prólogo de Gallois niega que la alquimia sea fabricar oro y la pone en la Medicina Universal, y la carta de Canseliet explica el nombre —piedra por forma acabada, filosofal por conocimiento esotérico—.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · pp. 7, 96

Putrefacción (putrefactio)El prólogo objeta el esquema de tres obras y reduce lo negro a lo que los alquimistas llaman putrefacción, dejando dos etapas finales por núcleo de la obra hermética.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · p. 6

Atanor (el horno de fuego constante)La advertencia de d’Ygé que cita el prólogo aparta a quien tome la alquimia por simbolismo con el hombre por materia y el atanor por obra.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · p. 7

Azufre (principio sulfúreo)La carta de Canseliet transcribe la definición de Schwaller: azufre por producto del fuego de la tierra, que coagula el mercurio y forma una sal negra y roja.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · p. 96

Mercurio de los filósofos (Mercurius)Canseliet conjetura que Schwaller obtuvo en laboratorio el mercurio alquímico, la tierra adámica; Ranque niega a Dujols y a Auriger haber resuelto el misterio del mercurio.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · pp. 28, 96

Materia primaEl caput mortuum desechado como escoria se reinterpreta como flor de todos los metales que lleva el embrión invisible de una esencia mineral nueva.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · p. 95

Cadena de transmisión (quién tomó de quién)El linaje martinista Saint-Martin–Chaptal–Delage–Papus se da con su impugnación al lado; el capítulo 1 se titula por la cadena de Hermes y sostiene una continuidad clandestina de la alquimia.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · pp. 10, 15

Iniciación (recepción por grados / metamorfosis del ser)El obituario de Dujols sostiene que la iniciación se adquiere por esfuerzo propio y no por la enseñanza didáctica de un jefe de grupo.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · p. 93

Secreto (lo que se jura no fijar por escrito)Dujols se llevó su secreto sin confiarlo ni a los más próximos, y el contrato entre Schwaller y Champagne obligaba a borrar todo rastro de la asociación.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · pp. 62, 94

Ocultismo (occultisme)El capítulo 2 describe el medio ocultista parisino por sus tres soportes —grupos, locales de reunión y prensa propia— con la alquimia en el papel principal.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · p. 13

Crítica de fuentes (criterios de inclusión y descarte)La enmienda in situ sobre el jinete de Melle y la comparación entre las cuatro versiones del reencuentro sevillano son el instrumento con que el libro mide sus documentos.

dubois-fulcanelli-alchemical-revival · pp. 75, 79

Works cited

Conversation

what readers say — distinct from what is recorded in the entry, which carries a citation